Jump to content

kapkomet

Admin
  • Posts

    24,025
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by kapkomet

  1. Here's the thing - first of all, the leftists have been creaming their pants for this. They have wanted something to stain the Bush White House since about, oh, January, 2001. That's what I was alluding to in my post above. Hell, how many posts did we have to have every day telling us every f***ing leak that took place that was going to GET THEM?!?! Then, futhermore, isn't it really interesting that 1- Britian STILL stands by this "yellowcake" claim, and 2- that Valerie Plame pushed like hell to get her husband into this Niger position, not once but TWICE - and he was over there for a very small period to find... "nothing". At that point, no one knew who the hell was even over there, and WALLAH, this op ed piece ends up in the NY Slimes about the yellow cake issue being phoney. I think at that point is when Scooter Libby started trying to figure out what happened, and when the names started being tossed. THEY fired the first salvo. It's even more interesting that Valarie Plame was a damn DESK analyst at the CIA. She was REALLY undercover, and her *GASP* life was at risk. :rolly Look. s*** went too far, that's becoming abundantly obvious. I also don't think that they should have blown this wide open. Had Joe Wilson kept his dang mouth shut and not ran to the NY Slimes, it probably would have never gotten this far. But to the left, the man did his "patriotic duty" by proving that George W. Bush was a liar for the war on Iraq, and that's all most of the left needs to know.
  2. Busts out the geeky CPA 10 key...
  3. Eh, just put some gieger counters in, and let the loudspeakers go as they all bow toward Mecca. Pretty soon, they'll be in paradise from all the radiation. I'm going to hell for that.
  4. QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Oct 28, 2005 -> 07:21 PM) So, when Earle spent his days indicting Democratic politicians, was that the criminalilzation of Progressive Politics? Do you know the history of who he indicted? You have to remember that Texas was almost ALL Democratic until the early 90's. And the indictments were generally those "conservative" Democrats.
  5. Those florescent light bulbs - are they more expensive? I'll have to look into that.
  6. I try to be conscious of the lights, and the thermostat, too. That's only common sense, though.
  7. WOOOOOOOOOOOOOO f***ING HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! PARTY LIKE YOUR A DEMOCRAT!!!! Hypocritical bulls***.
  8. damn i'm hungry but I Don't want to leave the office and miss any of this. this is one of the coolest things i have ever seen. no joke.
  9. I sure hope someone is getting this. THIS is AWESOME.
  10. Where's Soxy? I remember her post about some obsession with Nicole Kidman.
  11. Yes, probably. Oh wait, wrong administration.
  12. QUOTE(Mercy! @ Oct 28, 2005 -> 04:08 PM) I repeat: Where and how you live and work are ultimately YOUR choices. I might add, the word "fault" was your choice, as well. No serious response to this, either? "What has anyone here done besides complain about gasoline prices? What concrete steps have you taken?" Well, I'm a society drone. I just pay it. We don't go as many places... but gotta get to work. Did trade in my V6 for a 4 cylinder. But that V6 was about to have transmission problems too.
  13. Oh by the way, I like how you conveniently forgot one of the other "major" sports teams. WTG!
  14. QUOTE(gsoxs1 @ Oct 28, 2005 -> 02:34 PM) Hey Kap, if you forgot to set your TIVO depending on what kind you got. You can go online and set it up to record what you want. Nope, don't have "tivo" - have dish dvr.
  15. Not in this lifetime. I thought they'd turn it around, at least a little, this year. THEY SUCK ASS, at least on my one game sample size.
  16. Yea, I can ride a bike to where I work. Not. I can take public transportation to where I work. Not. I can buy electricity, which is a compliment to "oil products", and keep my prices down. Not. I can spend $1000's of dollars to move where this IS possible. Not. But that's all my fault. Yes, I would agree that it's AMERICA'S fault. We are a very greedy society.
  17. QUOTE(LosMediasBlancas @ Oct 28, 2005 -> 02:12 PM) I'm Latino and we only kiss our spouses or GFs on the lips. I think when people kiss their children on the lips it's gross and innapropriate. You're an AMERICANIZED Latino. I'm just kidding...
  18. oh cool. But I still want the recording.
  19. QUOTE(retro1983hat @ Oct 28, 2005 -> 02:07 PM) Channel 11 last night said they will rerun it tonight after Chicago Tonight. That doesn't help me cause I'm out of town, hence the dvd request. I'll of course pay for shipping and all of that.
  20. Either/or will do, I'd imagine the coverage will be roughly the same. Thanks!
  21. Will or can someone tivo and dvd the parade/celebration and all of that? I'd really like to watch all that. Now I feel like the rest of ya'll, starting all these damn dvd threads. Please let me know. Kap
  22. Good grief. It ain't like the tongues are thashing around or something. It's no big deal.
  23. QUOTE(FlaSoxxJim @ Oct 27, 2005 -> 09:52 PM) Agreed. And I can't see it NOT happening. The Evangelical Right is spoiling for this fight and are going to bring a lot of pressure upon Bush to make sure his next nominee is more to their liking. And I don't believe for a minute that the Evangelicals really care if the nominee is a constitutional 'constructionist' or 'originalist' etc. They only want somebody who help them make sure that pregnant people other than themselves can't get abortions, gay couples can't marry, God stays in the Pledge of Allegience and the Ten Commandments make it back to the courthouse, and the nation takes the next steps toward being the Fundamentalist Christian theocracy they think it should be. Flaxx, I hate this, but you're right. *I* want a "constructionist" - and by that definition, it's someone who keeps the FEDERAL government the hell out of these affairs and puts them back to the states where these issues belong. These "evangelicals" want Roe. v. Wade overturned. PERIOD. I may want it overturned, but not for killing the law itself, but to put it back to the states to decide their own fate on the issue.
×
×
  • Create New...