Reddy

QUOTE(Rex Kicka** @ Feb 5, 2008 -> 09:55 PM) Minnesota goes to Obama. 8 states for Obama, 6 for Clinton. adding CO will be 9. Then Alaska is 10. Which other ones?

love that she sounds metallic... like... i mean from a mic screw up. lol... see this is what i'm talking about though - she's talking issues and what needs to be done. i'm curious to see if Obama just goes through another round of Yes We Can bullsh*t

QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Feb 5, 2008 -> 09:48 PM) That will all be thrown to the wolves by whatever Arizona and CA do. right. everything hinges on CA

QUOTE(Athomeboy_2000 @ Feb 5, 2008 -> 09:43 PM) This is why I hate being an independent. I am a "moral" conservative but a "economic" liberal. So, I dont support abortion, but I like universal health care. So, i love Obama and some of his stands.... but on the other I love Huckabee and his strong Christian beliefs. If Obama were not in the race, i'd lean huckabee. well thank god Obama's in the race then... thing is, Christian beliefs are fine - but when you plan to dramatically overhaul the constitution to fit those beliefs i just think that's plain WRONG. why are YOUR beliefs more important than those of the rest of the country?

why havent they projected MO for Clinton yet? it's pretty obvious...

QUOTE(Athomeboy_2000 @ Feb 5, 2008 -> 09:40 PM) Huckabee is putting up one heck of a fight. i still doubt he takes the nod, but yeah - he's knocked Romney out of the race for sure. if he were to get it........... i THINK he'd be stompable, but i worry about how well he may be able to mobilize that good ole' religious right...

QUOTE(Athomeboy_2000 @ Feb 5, 2008 -> 09:38 PM) Edwards getting 9% on AZ. not bad. doubt it holds. honestly, i'm amazed he's gotten as much support as he has tonight. makes me happy.

think those people have seen Mitt's speech a few times? lol

QUOTE(Athomeboy_2000 @ Feb 5, 2008 -> 09:33 PM) I've said it before (and I know you are an exception), but if you are not for her... you are against her. well its because most people honestly aren't issues people. they vote based on likability. And yes, Obama rakes that one in. But for me, Hillary aligns more closely with the same issues that i supported Edwards for. And since Edwards support has largely split down the middle - i think you'll see that trend continuing with the personality people going obama and the issues people going clinton

wow... Huck already has won 3 states and is probably going to win three more (MO, TN, GA) that's scary.

QUOTE(KipWellsFan @ Feb 5, 2008 -> 09:25 PM) Obama doing well in Colorado early. Expected? i think it purely has to do with it being a caucus - i think when it comes to realignment people are moving to Obama from Edwards. If you remember, Edwards had some solid support in CO - looks like Obama's picking it up.

obama winning EVERY caucus, Hillary doing much stronger in the primaries... interesting...................

QUOTE(Athomeboy_2000 @ Feb 5, 2008 -> 09:17 PM) Looks like it might have been a data entry error. It has since been pulled down and UT as 0% reporting. damnit!

QUOTE(Athomeboy_2000 @ Feb 5, 2008 -> 09:12 PM) This is ones for you Reddy... WOOOO BABY! that's what i'm talking about.

QUOTE(Jimbo's Drinker @ Feb 5, 2008 -> 08:56 PM) Yes, this one particuliar lady.......just generalizing. yeah.... prolly shouldn't do that bud.

QUOTE(Jimbo's Drinker @ Feb 5, 2008 -> 08:53 PM) I understand, but so fearful of a crying woman vowing for president. ... wow. sexist much?

QUOTE(KipWellsFan @ Feb 5, 2008 -> 08:43 PM) What's the deal with Minnesota? I didn't expect to see Obama winning there. Obama also leading in Idaho and N.Dakota early. his support seems to be so random to me... there's no rhyme or reason as to why certain states go for him and others dont. although clearly, caucuses favor Obama.

YEAH!!! EDWARDS with 34% in Alabama!!! Clinton 20 Votes Edwards 11 Votes Obama 1 Vote EDIT: damn. already gone. lol

Hill closing the gap slightly in GA

QUOTE(ChWRoCk2 @ Feb 2, 2008 -> 09:26 PM) Yeah but if I understand that analysis right it means we would get that many runs if we batted Swisher and Thome 1 and 2. Which is pretty unrealistic. which is a shame. i'd love to see us actually put up a nontraditional yet more effective lineup like that. in reality, it only makes sense to give your top producers the most ABs

QUOTE(Vance Law @ Feb 2, 2008 -> 07:32 PM) Using Baseballmusings Lineup Analysis, I plugged in projections from Bill James. It projects we'd average about 5.53 runs per game. http://www.baseballmusings.com/cgi-bin/Lin...451&Model=0 Using whatever projections Baseballmusings uses, it put Cleveland at 5.60. A key thing to note is that the Swisher and Orlando C. projections were for their old ballparks. Basically it's up in the air which of these teams will have a better offense. Personally, I'll take the Sox. And oh yeah, they project the Tigers to score 5.58 runs per game (yes that's with Cabrera). All 3 teams have powerful offenses that will score a lot. It will come down to who has great seasons and who has mediocre/poor and who gets injured. All 3 teams have question marks in their rotation and in their bullpen. Who will perform best? I don't know. You don't know. I only know that Magglio and Granderson won't repeat their 2007 performances. right. we worry about Danks and Floyd and rightly so - but both the tigers and indians rotations are JUST as shaky if not MORE so. If the offenses are a wash, then i think it truly is anybody's game. all about how the pitching works out.

my entirely biased and bold opinion is that whomever John Edwards endorses will win. And if he endorses no one, Hillary will win. Obama getting that 10-15% in all those states would really put him over the top in some and i think catapult him to the lead. The same is true the other way around, so even though John dropped out, he STILL has the kingmaking ability.

QUOTE(YASNY @ Jan 30, 2008 -> 10:39 AM) Well hell, if it has anything to do with your last sentence, he shouldn't have been in to begin with. my point is if there's a deal in the works there's no point in continuing.

i think it's as simple as he cut a deal with Obama so he's dropping out. combine that with his wife's health and the insanity of his schedule over the next week - i mean if i were him i'd just skip it all too.

QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Jan 30, 2008 -> 08:37 AM) At least he has the decency to get out of the leaders way, either that or one of the leaders gave him a carrot to endorse him at a pivotal time... i guarantee it's the latter. but i'm fine with that. i just want my boy in the white house, be it VP or AG or whatever else. edit: and of course by white house i mean washington in general. lol