qwerty

Peja is sure gonna look good on the bulls in 2006.

3-4 so far, that is all he is good for though. I guess that is why he is known as a three point specialists.

I think they can definitely beat golden state, and they are looking really good thus far against the kings. They did last game too, but we all know how that turned out.

I do, willie and rowand are not exactly lead-offs hitters. Willie may have the potential one day but not this year. He should be batting ninth next year at the very best. Neither can bunt, although rowand is a pretty efficient base stealer.

Someone has to update this that guzman and castilla signed.

He was not ''released'', his option was just not picked up.

I believe, i am just saying krenzel nees to step it up immensely next week. If they don't win next week it will really hurt their chances of playoffs.

They have a chance but it is a very slim one. Next year though is their year to make some noise.

All i have to say is 19.5 quarter back rating last week.

I can see them getting one of polanco/young. But i highly doubt both.

Most years he is as consistent as it comes. This year was an exception though.

I meant in the outfield, i knew he was good with the bat.

May not be ideal but counsell can play 3rd, 2nd, and short. He puts up a decent obp even while having a low batting average. I can definitely see the sox going after him.

I also like young because he can fill in for an outfielder if we need him to. He was not overally bad last season in the outfield from what i recall.

What you said is more logical but i am just going from what i have heard on the board.

Only reason i would prefer cairo over young is the sole fact that he is alot younger. Other than that i would rather have young.

Not for the first month or so he will be the dh while thomas is out.

Eric young, like cheat has suggested all along.

He was born where addiston said, union city, tn. He has not gone on record that he will play for the phillies, they have just really been after him hard the last two years and have offered him a contract supposedly this year.

Like i said, he was with them from 1998 until 2003.

Problem for you is you are going off of 225 at-bats in the american league and are disregarding anything he has done before he was with boston.

Hasn't he been playing with them 6 out of the last seven years? If he was as good as you are making him out to be it should not effect his numbers any if at all.

Neither polanco or cabrera are more than average players. I don't know what you are trying to get to. Because if you truly think cabrera is better than polanco. Well i don't know what to say if you think that.

Go with what he has done the entire year and polanco blows him out of the water. Not just american league stats.

In the entire year his obp was .689, polanco's was nearly .100 points higher. Like i said 225 at-bats is not a great amount of at-bats to go off of.