Everything posted by fathom
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 3
What a f***ing joke. Why does Rowand suck so bad now? Get your f***ing hands out when you swing.
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 3
Terrible, terrible f***ing AB by Everett. I have a feeling we'll see the squeeze with Rowand up.
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 3
Now that was a great play by Figgins. Everett has to lay off the splitter here.
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 3
Everett is swinging out of his ass.
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 3
QUOTE(Rowand44 @ Oct 15, 2005 -> 02:38 AM) Big run out there on 3rd. And we need for Everett to get the runner home, because I don't like the match-up of Rowand vs Donnelly. Cora has to be smart though on any fly ball hit to the outfield, cause all three of these guys have solid to great arms.
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 3
Time for Everett to just hit a fly ball like he did last inning, and we'd get a big insurance run.
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 3
Oh PK....don't do that to me big fella!
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 3
Dye might try stealing here with Gregg taking a long time to deliver.
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 3
QUOTE(CYGarland @ Oct 15, 2005 -> 02:29 AM) Jg should be able to get through the 8th, and Jenks will close the 9th If they get at least one guy on base, I would bring in a lefty to face Kennedy, who seems to be a tough out for a lot of our righty pitchers.
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 3
Good inning by Garland.
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 3
That would have been a hit if Garland didn't field it.
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 3
QUOTE(CYGarland @ Oct 15, 2005 -> 02:22 AM) I wouldn't say they have a TON. They are still down by 3. Now If they cut it to one then............. True, but prior to the Cabrera homer, the Sox were cruising in this game. Now, you have the crowd believing they have a chance.
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 3
Angels have a ton of momentum right now. Garland has to step up this inning. Ozzie might want to get Cotts up in the bullpen to be cautious.
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 3
Pods....don't swing if it's above your letters.
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 3
Uribe called out on nearly the same pitch that wasn't called on Cabrera.
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 3
I have to ask this: Did anyone else notice Garland with a very odd look on his face when they did the close-up before the pitch?
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 3
Well, that's what you get for worrying about the runner on first base. We had K'd him twice on 2 strike fastballs...I'm shocked we didn't try a slider low and away.
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 3
That ball looked like it might have been a double off the bat. There's a big difference there between Berman and Buck.
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 3
Time to keep this crowd quiet.
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 3
QUOTE(qwerty @ Oct 15, 2005 -> 02:03 AM) 1.44 whip this season... and the only reason he got as much money that he did when he signed with the angels is because of his 2004 season. Well, then he must have really sucked after I saw him pitching on the MLB package a few months ago. I remember how Iguchi and the Sox beat him in extra innings earlier this year, and I was so happy when he came in to pitch.
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 3
QUOTE(qwerty @ Oct 15, 2005 -> 02:00 AM) Yan sucked ass this year. His ERA was hovering around 4 until late in the season. If you remember him from the previous few seasons prior to this season, that's a solid year for him.
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 3
QUOTE(atrain081 @ Oct 15, 2005 -> 01:59 AM) anyone else wanna see more fancam? There was some phenomenal talent in the stands during the series in Anaheim during the regular season.
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 3
QUOTE(SSH2005 @ Oct 15, 2005 -> 01:57 AM) Lackey was getting hammered and they don't want to burn out their good relievers. Where's Esteban Yan? Yan had a pretty solid season, I seem to recall. Gregg was coming in for the 10th inning if it went that far during game 2.
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 3
That seems like the first time Erstad has K'd vs the Sox in years.
-
Sox @ Angels - ALCS Game 3
QUOTE(jphat007 @ Oct 15, 2005 -> 01:51 AM) LOL. Did anyone see Blum? No, what?