Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soxtalk.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Jake

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jake

  1. While the ERA isn't such a huge deal for a closer, he hasn't been good for quite a while. At least a month.
  2. QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Sep 8, 2012 -> 03:56 AM) Yeah, well f***ing boom. No, my predictions are not on steroids either.
  3. QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Sep 8, 2012 -> 09:20 AM) And its not like HE actually qualified to get in there... If you can't get into Memphis, you have some serious problems
  4. The notion of state governments is exceedingly antiquated. Makes things unnecessarily complicated and inefficient.
  5. QUOTE (fathom @ Sep 7, 2012 -> 10:23 PM) Well, if you look at the whole picture (stats on the year), you'd see that something killing the Sox is their bullpen. I would definitely agree if the statement looked like this.
  6. Jake replied to flavum's topic in FutureSox Board
    QUOTE (fathom @ Sep 7, 2012 -> 09:24 PM) Dynamic pricing
  7. QUOTE (Swingandalongonetoleft @ Sep 7, 2012 -> 10:18 PM) Lineup tomorrow ought to be based entirely on who has the fewest at-bats against Chen in a White Sox uniform. Basically the lineup at the end of the Twins' drubbing
  8. QUOTE (RZZZA @ Sep 7, 2012 -> 10:14 PM) Dude, we can't beat the Royals. We can't beat the Tigers. We've looked like a crappy team since the ASB I don't think these are over reactions. They're affirmations of reality. You gotta chill out...we haven't played well for about 10 days. That's okay. We haven't been healthy either, hardly seen anything from Dunn and Youk is hurting as well (I realize he just had a child). Let's see how this series ends and how we play the Tigs at home. It's easy to read into everything that happens into the final month, but this season is more than that. We've won some huge games and have shown some major cajones. Those things still count when we can't pull through. Don't forget to look at the whole picture. Dismissing all important wins as mere happenstance and seeing every failure as proof of our mediocrity doesn't make any sense. If you were a baseball player with that attitude, you'd be Gordon Beckham.
  9. Glad to see gross overreactions in the game thread. Anyways, terrible call to end it on.
  10. QUOTE (Iwritecode @ Sep 7, 2012 -> 09:55 AM) This story doesn't surprise me one bit. The rules have never applied to the mods. It's like they are trying to drive away their posters. Many of them long-timers. Also in his mind, SS2k5 is never, ever wrong. Good night sweet prince
  11. QUOTE (QuickJones81 @ Sep 7, 2012 -> 11:47 AM) Not impressed with the new MLB.com prospect rankings. There isn't a single White Sox prospect in the Top 100, and the organization Top 20 has me scratching my head as well. 1. Trayce Thompson 2. Courtney Hawkins 3. Charlie Leesman 4. Nestor Molina 5. Keenyn Walker 6. Scott Snodgress 7. Carlos Sanchez 8. Erik Johnson 9. Jared Mitchell 10. Keon Barnum 11. Josh Phegley 12. Jacob Petricka 13. Jhan Marinez 14. Kevan Smith 15. Simon Castro 16. Tyler Saladino 17. Brandon Brennan 18. Andre Rienzo 19. Marcus Semien 20. Chris Beck Other notables from position ranks: Keon Barnum #10 1B Carlos Sanchez #7 2B I'm okay with 1,2, 4. Mitchell, Barnum, Sanchez all need to be much higher. Castro should probably be our top pitcher and in the Top 5. Joey DeMichele should be in the Top 20.
  12. Jake replied to NorthSideSox72's topic in The Filibuster
    QUOTE (greg775 @ Aug 11, 2012 -> 02:09 PM) I ignored somebody and it is great. And NOBODY ever quotes this person which may say something about that person's posts. Of course I am on many ignore buttons as well. Quoting this so that everyone knows that Greg posted
  13. The debates are usually worth watching, but they do what they should do and respond to most things ideologically. "What will you do with taxes?" Romney: "I will empower job creators to grow their business and hire people instead of paying for welfare" Obama: "I will get those evil corporate elites to drown in their tax obligations! Go middle class!" ooooo, ahhhh
  14. CENSOR THE MEDIA THEY SAY MEAN THINGS ABOUT AJ
  15. QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Sep 7, 2012 -> 07:55 AM) He compromises like Barack. Take my side, or I will throw a temper and punish you. At least God doesn't play games with our credit rating, eh
  16. Mitt will be great in foreign policy...especially with developing states. He'll be happy to relocate all of our domestic manufacturing to foreign countries
  17. I would say that Biden is maybe more entertaining, but only because he's a terrible speaker and seems unable to decide whether he wants to be on the prompter or not.
  18. I thought the President's speech was good. Not great or revolutionary, nothing like that, but good. He was at times humble, he was direct, he was specific on some policy goals (obviously interested in how we get to these goals, but that stump wasn't the right avenue for a full explanation), went after his opponent but not in an absolutely bloodthirsty way, and generally laid out what the aims of his next term in office will be. He made some statements that sounded decidedly non-socialist, for people worried about that. "The government can't solve every problem, but every problem can be solved" or something like that.
  19. Greg, I feel like your political sentiments are shifting
  20. I think a "good" Christian would hope that everyone believed in God and more specifically in the Christian way of life. As an American, they ought to hope that but not enforce it in any way. I think no one should abort a child, but I realize that I have no way of proving in a legal way that it is wrong. Therefore, laws banning abortion disgust me because I know it is an inappropriate restriction. Nonetheless, in my own private situations I'd avoid abortion if at all possible. Same thing. Your private hopes and desires don't have to become policy. You can be a Christian that loves heterosexual marriage and dislikes the idea of gay marriage...but IMO you have no grounds for legislating against gay marriage. You can simply not like it.
  21. Motownsports didn't accept me.
  22. QUOTE (mr_genius @ Sep 6, 2012 -> 09:24 PM) Obama takes the stage and Balta just fainted in his living room fap fap fap
  23. QUOTE (Cknolls @ Sep 6, 2012 -> 11:03 AM) Just want the same metrics used in measuring. Net jobs created since BO in office is 300,000. Why do you say 4 million? because it starts from the summer of 2010 low point? GMAFB. The narrative is lovely, really. But who is lying? GM fixed? Where did the gov't sell the rest of their stock and how much did we lose on it? How is ALLY doing? How is GM Europe doing? How much did GM steal from the taxpayers by writing off futures profits against past losses? Yeah all fixed. I think both metrics are useful. QUOTE (greg775 @ Sep 6, 2012 -> 01:38 PM) Oops. Looks like Obama has not wanted to cooperate with the Repubs as well. Sounds like the impasse is his fault as well. Guess there usually are two sides to every story. Read this. http://news.yahoo.com/fact-check-clinton-c...--election.html And Woodward gives huge evidence the Obama White House has no leader and is a joke. Let's face facts. The bottom line: Obama is a better choice than Romney but Obama is a joke of a President. http://news.yahoo.com/bob-woodward-book-de...-151043612.html We already discussed this... QUOTE (CrimsonWeltall @ Sep 6, 2012 -> 01:52 PM) wut. Their example of Obama not cooperating with Republicans is a deal in which he compromised so much that it pissed Democrats off and yet Republicans still refused to agree...and that's both sides being at fault? ^^^ QUOTE (Soxbadger @ Sep 6, 2012 -> 08:00 PM) If your not watching the CNN feed, Mark Kelly the husband of Gabrielle Giffords is talking about a new pac where they will only give money to Democrats who are willing to work with Republicans. Whether or not its true, can people at least agree that these are the type of statements we want to see? That we prefer people who want to help and work through problems, to Gorver Norquist? That seems like a reasonable place to start, that both sides pledge they are going to try to be productive, instead of try to f*** things up purposefully? Tim Johnson, the Rep for my former district, founded a Center Aisle Caucus. It advocated only cooperation and civility, not necessarily "centrist" policies. Now that he is retiring he believes the caucus will fold due to low membership. QUOTE (Soxbadger @ Sep 6, 2012 -> 08:30 PM) im pretty sure hes saying that obama gave all of those things for free and that its just handouts to people who arent deserving. It wasnt my comment though. I like Biden, I know thats not popular. He may not be the smartest, but thats not what its all about. I think Biden spent that whole speech off prompter...and getting back on was even harder than being off.
  24. QUOTE (greg775 @ Sep 6, 2012 -> 01:43 PM) I'm not as Wolfish today after reading that Bill lied. I'm sick of getting misled. Obama isn't exactly bending over backwards to work with the other side, it appears. I feel mighty dumb the day after. Bill made me feel good about the country and the possibilities of the future for a night and fooled me for an hour. I got duped. My bad. http://news.yahoo.com/fact-check-clinton-c...--election.html That article is terrible. While Clinton's speech certainly was biased, those weren't lies. He says the Republican Party is inflexible. Great, that seems to suggest the PLAN for Dems is to cooperate. And seriously, I'm sure Obama has refused to compromise on some issues but as someone who is liberal in most cases I've found the President to be far too compromising when it never gets him closer to bipartisan legislation anyway. Then he says costs are going up at a slow pace, which is TRUE. So is the fact that this happened after the ACA. Maybe it isn't because of those two things, but you can't act as if spending is shooting up because of the ACA when it isn't. That's the point. Basically, the article has a difference of OPINION on the matter not the facts. The article points out that major cost cutting measures have not even come into effect...doesn't this make the law look better? The growth of costs is slowing and there's still more help to come? And then he says to remember when he grew the economy. This is true. It happened, and it happened in the time that he says it did. Why would he say that it changed later? It wasn't relevant. "it's bad now but it will get better" is the message. When it gets better, we can correct him and say that it will soon get worse just like it did when he was President. Contrast this to things like "this plant closed because of Obama*" *plant closed while GWB was president* Oh, yeah...Bill got a BJ and lied about it DEFINITELY got owned by a nation of fact-checkers during that scandal

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.