Steff

90 wins... I think that's definitely doable

QUOTE(LosMediasBlancas @ Apr 26, 2005 -> 03:38 PM) It's sad, girls want that 'TV look' so badly. I like to look toned and skinny just like the next wanabe.. I watch what I eat and work out. It's really not that hard.

We moved quite a few of these guys... A "Lombardo" ownes one of our agencies..

Quite a few people were smoking but it wasn't too bad in there at all. They do have huge exhaust fans above. I smelled worse from that nasty bar full of Cub fans we went into after the show..

I just have to say this is sick, sick, sick.. :puke Why a female would want to ruin their body like this simply blows my mind.. :headshake

QUOTE(LosMediasBlancas @ Apr 26, 2005 -> 03:26 PM) Who is that freak Stern has on his show once in a while. She swears she's female and I think Howard sent her to get medical proof. Anyone got a pic? Nichole Bass. And she's is female.. according to her DNA anyway. Definite roid user though.

QUOTE(Be Good @ Apr 26, 2005 -> 03:31 PM) Yup. And before that??? 94

QUOTE(NUKE_CLEVELAND @ Apr 26, 2005 -> 03:29 PM) Why on earth would we want LaToya? He sucks. I mean he flat out sucks. I think Shingo gives us enough heartburn in the closer spot. We don't need this slug here. Not to mention his "me, me, me, me attitude.." We don't need that here. We already have enough bad attitudes on the team..

QUOTE(Punch and Judy Garland @ Apr 26, 2005 -> 03:12 PM) Judy dressing down Paul Konerko for making an error when he pitched: great guy. If you would take Garland over Prior then you need to put the brew down. Getting real sick and tired of people getting s*** on for having different opinions. To say you'd take other fine.. but crapping on others is getting regoddamndiculous around here. JMO..

You two should get a room and work all that anger out..

I agree, don't mess with the pen. I also don't want to give them anything from the farm. Quite honestly.. I don't want anything from them either. LOL. No deals with the Cubs..

Sweet. I can't remember the last time they were on the top. Must have been sometime in 2000.

QUOTE(ZeroHour @ Apr 26, 2005 -> 02:22 PM) If it looks like the game could be called, theres no reason to head out. Nice.. :rolly

QUOTE(WSFAN35 @ Apr 26, 2005 -> 12:41 PM) No one knows what kinda teammates either of these guys are. And I don't know if any of you remember Garland talking s*** about us fans. I know what their teammates say about them. That's good enough for me.

Attitude is my reason for picking Garland. I would rather have someone who is thankful for their talent and opportunity that a self centered asshole who feels he's is owed something because of his talent.

QUOTE(CaliSoxFanViaSWside @ Apr 26, 2005 -> 11:14 AM) Even when he does return I doubt he will be pain free. Frank's the man and I know we all wish him a speedy recovery. Absolutely... he's said many times that this is something he will have to tolerate the rest of his life. He compared it to the paif of arthritis in humid weather.

QUOTE(Controlled Chaos @ Apr 26, 2005 -> 11:11 AM) In my medical opinion Steff, 7% incline and 5mph...he was running on that treadmill!! Go Frank!!!!!!!!! 5 mph is just a bit less than a slow "trot" for me.. and since he's at least a good foot and a half taller than me with a huge stride I would guess that it was just a medium walk for him. The 7% incline is more impressive to me. That puts a lot of pressure on the area.

QUOTE(mreye @ Apr 26, 2005 -> 10:56 AM) Uh oh. Don't do anything rash. Contact the authorities and see if he's required to tell you the truth. If he is, get his ass in trouble. If not, just let him know you know the truth and keep an eye on him. Don't get yourself in trouble by kicking his ass. That's the last thing your family needs. It think he's just required to register and, unfortunately, that's where his responsibility ends. Sad... The poor children.

QUOTE(ptatc @ Apr 26, 2005 -> 10:51 AM) I hope Steff is right and that he is doing better than what they are saying because if not he will need more rest to decrease the inflammation. He will need to do this before he can rebuild the strength to run and begin his rehab assignment. ptatc.. just a bit of info I want to share.. Frank was out of his cast and in a walking boot 6 weeks before the Sox released that info. Aaron and him were working out a good month before it was reported. He was walking on the treadmill at a 7% incline at 5 mph before ST even started. These are the things that I go by when I say that the Sox are being overly cautious in reporting anything. Frank is still hurting, as I'm sure anyone would be.. but I honestly think (from him and those close to him) that he's further along than they are reporting just in case there is a setback. They are definitely being cautious.. and the scar tissue was a setback as you stated it would be. You've been on the money in responding to what the Sox are reporting. Your info is great in relation to the medical side. It's nice to have someone here that can explain those details.

QUOTE(EvilJester99 @ Apr 26, 2005 -> 10:38 AM) I just checked the web site again and it does have a "Details" button to click on and I found out what he actually did. He lied bold f***ing face. Its says his crime is AGGRAVATED CRIMINAL SEXUAL ABUSE/VICTIM Nice... What an effing scumbag.

QUOTE(mreye @ Apr 26, 2005 -> 10:32 AM) I think "Statutory" would be the crime. "Predator" would be what he "is." Probably, according to the courts, anyone that has sex with a minor, no matter the age, is a "predator." Semantics, I'm sure. Once you get the report, you'll know for sure. That's exactly what I think. It's a crime in itself with it's own ramifications. I would guess that the penalties are different also. Jester be sure to keep us updated.

All this whining does nothing for me... "Mommy.. Timmy said the "f word..."

QUOTE(EvilJester99 @ Apr 26, 2005 -> 10:23 AM) The discription I got off the web site said he was a "Sexual predator". I didn't see any in depth info about it. I need to look again to be sure. To me.. that means he has a history of it. I would think statutory would be able to be listed on there. Or lewd actions against a minor.. The word "predator" concerns me.

QUOTE(EvilJester99 @ Apr 26, 2005 -> 10:16 AM) That basically was his explanation. He was 21 and she was 17...and supposedly they were in love and the parents went nuts...I am still being careful though. 17 is age of sexual concent in Illinois is it not...? I thought 16 was the cutoff.

QUOTE(EvilJester99 @ Apr 26, 2005 -> 10:16 AM) That basically was his explanation. He was 21 and she was 17...and supposedly they were in love and the parents went nuts...I am still being careful though. Jester.. I may be mistaken but I think that would be part of the conviction description.. what does the site say he was convicted of..?