SoxFan1

QUOTE(nitetrain8601 @ Dec 3, 2005 -> 11:25 PM) Um, why in the world would Billy Beane trade for a guy who's going to leave next year? They might as well keep Zito who is the better pitcher if they're going to keep guys on 1 year deals. Garland's not going anywhere unless Boston offers us Ortiz, Ramirez, and there 2 best pitching prospects.

That is a sweet vector. Haven't heard from ya in a while Simon...

The thing about is that the Cubs can get raped in a deal for Pierre but the fans would still think that the deal is the best ever.

QUOTE(Kalapse @ Dec 3, 2005 -> 01:25 AM) Now I have to make a Bears D-Line sig. Why must you do this to me? Uuum, okay?

QUOTE(WHarris1 @ Dec 3, 2005 -> 01:21 AM) And then Willie and MB talking s*** about him. Personally one of my favorite parts of the DVD. "Look at Backe over there trying to look tough. Mr. Tough-guy."

My Prediction: The 2 men in my sig will dominate the weak Packers O-Line.

Yessir!

QUOTE(DBAH0 @ Dec 3, 2005 -> 12:25 AM) Well you've got to look at it from the point of view, that's it's going to increase our power production. Gooch could easily hit 20 HR's down lower in the order, while you're not going to lose much from Uribe moving up in the order, where he showed in 2004 that he had pretty good numbers there. I agree, Uribe was phenomenal batting 2nd in 2004. I dunno, I just really like Gooch batting 2nd. You could almost always count on him to get the guy over or get the guy in. If Uribe can show that he can do that and produce like he normally can...it would be a big plus.

QUOTE(Kid Gleason @ Dec 3, 2005 -> 12:16 AM) Turkey's actually don't have nuts. It's the "waddle" that you eat at the "Turkey Testicle Festivals" and stuff of the sort. Ha....ahaha...he gave a dead turkey a BJ.

I still don't see the point of moving Gooch out of the 1 spot. If Ozzie really believes he can produce more at 6 then I will trust him but having Gooc bat 2nd last season did not hurt at all.

QUOTE(DBAH0 @ Dec 3, 2005 -> 12:01 AM) I got the K's mixed up from his first name to the second. Oh and another question, will he fumble more than twice in this game? Please, do not undermine the presence of the Bears defense. He will fumble numerous times.

Yes WilliamTell....the Bears > Chiefs

QUOTE(DBAH0 @ Dec 2, 2005 -> 11:46 PM) I think the question you should be asking is whether Gadko is going to rush for more than 10 yards or not. 1.) It's Gado... 2.) No, he will not get more than 10 yards.

Got some pretty damn good topics...

Bears 77 - Packers 1 1/2

QUOTE(WilliamTell @ Dec 2, 2005 -> 10:53 PM) Yah Mon!!!! So many good quotes.... "Sanka mon, ya dead?" "Ya mon."

Haha...smooth talking host. LMAO.

QUOTE(WilliamTell @ Dec 2, 2005 -> 09:10 PM) Call me a grinch or whatever but I hate the movie A Christmas Story. It's on waaaaay to much and I never liked it to begin with. The movies I like are: Cool Runnings Iron Will Operation Dumbo Drop A Kid in King Arthur's Court The Air Up There I wouldn't call any of them sucky, especially Cool Runnings since I liked it, but they're certainly not very famous movies. OMFG! I love that f***ing movie. I'm going to go watch it right now!

QUOTE(Rowand44 @ Dec 2, 2005 -> 08:10 PM) He pitched in high school. Gotcha.

Did I miss something or is Ryan Sweeney pitching in that sig???

QUOTE(Chisoxfn @ Dec 2, 2005 -> 02:17 AM) Resident Evil and Resident Evil 2. For whatever reason I like those movies. Under Siege is another great movie in my book. Just some badas actoin scenes. Of course #1 on my all time list is Transporter 2. That is the single funniest movie ever made. One question, do you all ever watch a movie on some channel and you realize it sucks but for some reason you just keep watching it thinking it is going to get better. Every once in a while I find myself doing that and I sit there and think why, yet don't change the channel (usually it happens when I'm at home sick and resting). Dude, that movie was f***ing badass. Why is it the funniest movie ever?

And for the record, Erstad hasn't played in CF since 2003 but he was injured a lot and played only 66 games. 2002 was his last full season in CF when he played 142 games with a .998 FPCT.

Is he in enough shape to play CF for 120+ games a year? He's 31 years old and was moved to 1st for a reason but his numbers at the Cell are sick! .412 avg, .444 OBP, .588 SLG, 1.032 OPS since 2002 and his numbers are better at U.S. Cellular than they are in any other stadium. Dodger Stadium is 2nd.

QUOTE(Chisoxfn @ Dec 2, 2005 -> 07:33 PM) I think we will be getting Pierre, but I would yack if they gave up Cotts or Young in the deal. That said I think Marte and Sweeney is a possibility. In fact, I could see Marte and Anderson. I think we'd be over-paying, but if Pierre plays like he did two years ago it fills a need so to speak. I would be hesitant giving up Anderson even if it was with just Marte. Is it worth giving him up for 1 year of Pierre?

QUOTE(SSH2005 @ Dec 2, 2005 -> 07:02 PM) :finger :Bows: Thank you, thank you.