Everything posted by Dick Allen
-
Official 2013-2014 College Hoops Thread
Jay Bilas ✔ @JayBilas Follow I've just watched every Iowa game since December. The Hawkeyes are as good as ANYONE. This is an underrated team good enough to win it all. 12:30 PM - 22 Jan 2014
-
2014 Catching Scenarios
QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Jan 22, 2014 -> 02:03 PM) 1. Even if it should be that way, I don't see the Sox deciding that 2014 is a lost year. Every indication says otherwise. 2. If they think he will be an MLB player in 15/16/17, then hiding him on the MLB bench does very little to help that - a lot less than putting him at AA then AAA the next year or two. So it stunts his development. That's why they will care. 3. No one is contesting that they are trying to get more catching talent in the system. The question is, what is their plan? I think him making the major league roster is a long shot and I think they are smart enough to see that. Therefore, that isn't what they think is likely. Going down that road, they obviously have a backup plan that is likely to come up, and the most logical one is the path I mentioned. Yeah, I don't see how sitting a guy on the bench in 2014 gets him ready in 2015. Rule 5 guys hardly ever work anymore, but if he shows enough, I think the Sox will work out a deal to keep him. It would be a miracle, especially for a catcher, for him to stick an entire season, especially with Konerko taking a bench spot. This guy cannot be hidden. He would have to play.
-
2014 Cubs Catch-All Thread
QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Jan 22, 2014 -> 01:04 PM) Just had a Cubs fan tell me Sox were never in on Tanaka, Sox have the worst front office in baseball, have done nothing to improve their MLB team or farm system the past five years, Sale's contract is worthless if they don't trade him. Cubs were a playoff team with Tanaka and Tigers signed Joba for the same amount they used to pay Fielder. f***ing idiot. Sounds about as baseball-savvy as the typical "fan" at Wrigley Field.
-
2014 Cubs Catch-All Thread
QUOTE (Harry Chappas @ Jan 22, 2014 -> 12:58 PM) Revenue for the rooftops is probably close to $1M annually. The buildings have been retrofitted to serve the purpose of being a bar on the top two or three floors if not the entire building. I would guess the cost to buy those buildings would be in the $50-$100M range. Rooftop tickets have dropped drastically in price in recent years. Plus you have to share your income with the Cubs. A building sold a couple years ago for $5 million, in fact, I think the Cubs bought it, and they wouldn't have to buy every rooftop, just the buildings the signs block. The Cubs agreement only runs another 10 years anyway. It may be time some of these rooftop owners may want to flee. They have to spend money litigating, and might wind up with zilch. Considering it's supposedly holding up the plan, spending $20-25 million buying out the rooftops holding up the project seems a small price to pay. And they can run the rooftop and get 100% of the profit. And according to the Cubs themselves: Kenney said $20 million in bleacher sales has been lost because of the threat of a rooftop lawsuit. I don't know how that last statement adds up. Maybe it is just the guy who actually agreed to the agreement between the team and rooftop owners now trying to make them the fall guys for the pathetic excuse they are for a team. Afterall, Theo tried to pin Brett Jackson being a bust on Sveum wanting to work with him in the big leagues, when all Theo would have had to say is no. Maybe in a few years, they will finally get the renovation done, all their prospects will be stars and the Ricketts will laugh at all the doubters. But the way everything has gone wrong, I tend to think there is a lot more glee for Cubs haters the next 6 or 7 years.
-
2014 Cubs Catch-All Thread
Why don't the Cubs just buy out the affected rooftops? It can't cost much more than a reserve infielder. If this is supposedly holding everything up, with what they will have to pay lawyers and time lost, wouldn't that make sense? Money must really be tight at Clark/Addison. It seems to me the Ricketts kids bought a lemon of a car without having a mechanic look at it first. I bet Cubs fans thought anyone but the Tribune Company would be good for the Cubs. Be careful what you wish for.
-
Rosenthal: Tanaka to Yankees
QUOTE (bmags @ Jan 22, 2014 -> 10:49 AM) Was going to say, if there was anything Theo is terrible at it's contracts like these. They dodged a bullet. The Crane Kenny goofball that holds a high position with the Cubs stated this past weekend that the rebuild could take the rest of this decade. LMAO, that's 6 years. One problem is the rooftop owners apparently are holding the Wrigley makeover hostage. The Cubs won't start until they sign something saying they won't sue. Those owners are heroes.
-
Rosenthal: Tanaka to Yankees
QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jan 22, 2014 -> 10:38 AM) He might not play again, but he won't walk away from his money. No chance of that. I agree, but to me the Yankees either are able to void the contract or will wind up releasing him. Then I really wonder if ARod would even bother looking to continue to play, but considering he is talking about showing up for spring training, I'm thinking he might. If he does, I would think a team trying to win wouldn't need the circus and distraction a 40 year old guy who hasn't hardly played for a couple of years would bring, but a guy like Loria would probably sign ARod to the minimum, let him play in his hometown, and try to draw people to the freak show. If is contract gets terminated, I think he's probably done and will spend the next few years fighting it in court. If he ultimately gets released, then I think there is a chance he would play for peanuts elsewhere while collecting on the contract, as long as someone is willing to take him.
-
Rosenthal: Tanaka to Yankees
I'm pretty sure whether they have to pay him or not, ARod is done playing for the Yankees, and unless a guy like Loria wants to make him some sort of zoo attraction, is probably done playing MLB.
-
Rosenthal: Tanaka to Yankees
QUOTE (Stan Bahnsen @ Jan 22, 2014 -> 10:28 AM) Boys and girls, take solace in the fact that while we're various shades of bummed here, there's genuine mourning in Wrigleyville. I was always told on television and radio everyone wanted to play for the Cubs.
-
Rosenthal: Tanaka to Yankees
QUOTE (ChiSox59 @ Jan 22, 2014 -> 10:01 AM) I'd like to see the SOX allocate roughly $50M-$55M of what they offered Tanaka and go get Matt Garza. If anything, the Tanaka sweepstakes have shown that the Ricky is ready to spend to make this team competitive as quickly as possible. I think putting Garza in the 2 spot in the rotation makes this a much better team, and it solves the rotation for the next several seasons. Garza gets hurt a lot and when Theo got lucky when he traded him when he was having a real hot streak. He was mediocre at best with Texas. To me, he's a guy who probably puts up Gavin Floyd type numbers in the AL. I don't think that is worth spending $50 million.
-
Rosenthal: Tanaka to Yankees
QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jan 22, 2014 -> 09:44 AM) The IL numbers are old. They now pay 5% income tax instead of just 3%. Then you also have to add in City of Chicago and Cook County stuff. If you have ever paid city of Chicago or Cook County income tax, I have an extra elevator pass you may be interested in. But sales tax is pretty high. So for every day living, the cost could be higher, but I would imagine it is still nowhere near the cost of NYC or LA.
-
Rosenthal: Tanaka to Yankees
QUOTE (lasttriptotulsa @ Jan 22, 2014 -> 09:37 AM) Agreed. If Darvish came over and flopped, you'd better believe Tanaka would have not gotten as good of a deal. Kaz Matsui being a huge flop helped the Sox get Iguchi for a song.
-
Rosenthal: Tanaka to Yankees
QUOTE (southside hitman @ Jan 22, 2014 -> 09:31 AM) Brutal either way, but you can only push so far. You assume that he pitches well enough to want to re-negotiate a contract that pays him like the a top five pitcher in all of baseball from his age 29-32 years. You also have to look at it if he needed an opt out after 4 years, is your team ready to win the next 4 seasons? If winning a WS isn't realistic the next 4 seasons, signing Tanaka and paying the fee makes less sense.
-
Rosenthal: Tanaka to Yankees
QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Jan 22, 2014 -> 09:26 AM) No, it's important not to look at it like this. It CAN be a 4 year deal, but the decision is totally up to Tanaka. This is not the same as the Cutler deal (or any NFL deal) were the team can cut their losses after that if they want. The Yankees can never cut Tanaka loose. Only Tanaka himself can cut himself loose. If he sucks it's a 7 year deal. If he is awesome, it's a 4 year deal. If his performance is mixed, it depends on how good he was in 2016-2017. What is funny is all the speculation, all the fake information by supposed insiders who make their living being insiders, and in the end it winds up being almost exactly what was predicted when it first came out he may be posted.
-
Rosenthal: Tanaka to Yankees
QUOTE (southside hitman @ Jan 22, 2014 -> 09:16 AM) You can spread out 35 million over as many years as you like, but it matters to a team like the Sox and obviously doesn't to the Yankees. I spread out the 35 million over the course of the contract and added the posting fee, and as I pointed out, it wasn't much different annually averaged. Obviously I am not adding interest made on money sitting elsewhere, but rates are pretty low right now. Maybe in 4 or 5 years that could be very different. 7 years is scary, but so was 6 and 5 and 4 and 3 for that kind of money, but if he pitches well, the 7th year is irrelevant, it won't go that far. He will be re-negotiating after 4.
-
Rosenthal: Tanaka to Yankees
QUOTE (Melissa1334 @ Jan 22, 2014 -> 09:14 AM) I wonder if sale will eventually ask for it to be restructured with these contracts getting larger and larger JR doesn't do that. Hopefully he won't get upset and think he was taken advantage of, but he could always have said no, I'll play it out.
-
Rosenthal: Tanaka to Yankees
What this shows is how much of a bargain Sale's contract is. The Sox need to take advantage of this.
-
Rosenthal: Tanaka to Yankees
QUOTE (southside hitman @ Jan 22, 2014 -> 09:00 AM) An extra year and 35 million isn't too much different? I'll quote you on that if we signed Garza or Jimenez to a year one 35 million dollar contract. Please do. Add the posting fee. 6 years 120 million plus the 20 million posting fee= 6 years 140 million=$23.3 million a year 7 years 155 million pluse the 20 million posting fee=7 years 175 million=$25 million a year
-
Rosenthal: Tanaka to Yankees
QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Jan 22, 2014 -> 08:57 AM) Good thing Tanaka's wifes LA pop career figured in so much to this. And the close travel to Japan Flight time to Tokyo from LA 10 hours, from Chicago 11.5 hours, from NYC 13 hours. Really not much different especially if you are in first class with a bed.
-
Rosenthal: Tanaka to Yankees
If you were OK with 6 and 120, 7 and 155 isn't too much different. I want to know what the Cubs offer was? What is Cubbie blogger saying now? Bruce, I thought the Cubs were the "lead team"?
-
Rosenthal: Tanaka to Yankees
Too bad. Now I hope he sucks. The problem with the 4 year opt out is then it basically costs you $5 million extra per year with the posting fee. Hopefully in a few years Tanaka will look back and say he should have signed with the White Sox, but the Yankees were desperate. They probably would have paid him whatever it took. I like the White Sox agressiveness, and Hahn is either a great actor or really thought he had a shot. This bodes well for the future IMO.
-
Rosenthal: Tanaka to Yankees
QUOTE (Jose Abreu @ Jan 21, 2014 -> 03:12 PM) wang chu @nflnbainsider 15s #Tanaka decision coming around 9am Tokyo time. 3 1/2 hours from now he's going to #yankees for 6 years 130 million as its been reported Everybody have fun tonight Everybody wang chu tonight
-
Rosenthal: Tanaka to Yankees
QUOTE (RockRaines @ Jan 21, 2014 -> 03:07 PM) Dice-K could have been good if his body didnt fall apart. Yeah, he had one really nice year. 18-3 2.90 ERA
-
Dr. V's Magical Putter
The author agreed to a phone conversation strickly about the science of the putter and not the scientist. Then Dr. V started volunteering this false information which couldn't be verified, and ultimately led to a background check. Unless she left a note which wasn't reported, how can Kahrl and anyone else say without a doubt the reason for her suicide was she was about to be outed as a transgender? She attempted before for a different reason. Maybe she did it because her Dr. V fantasy with the fact degrees, stealth bomber work...was about to be exposed as fake. Sure he seemed unstable when he asked on a follow up conversation to verify her personal information, but as was stated by her investor, that was par for the course when not doing everything her way. I didn't take away her being a transgender was mentioned to make her look weird, I think it was mentioned because it was part of the story trying to verify information she happily volunteered.
-
Rosenthal: Tanaka to Yankees
QUOTE (flavum @ Jan 21, 2014 -> 01:38 PM) If it's down to the Cubs and Yankees, I hope he signs with the Cubs. Stay out of the league. Go to a bad team. I hope he is Darvish with the Sox. Dice-K with the Dodgers, Yankees, D-Backs, Irabu with the Cubs.