StrangeSox

Gameday Audio is a good minute behind the live broadcasts and Gameday stats.

5 weak ground outs so far. Practicing for the DP ball?

1 pitch, 1 out for Danks.

8-pitch 1st inning.

QUOTE(lostfan @ Apr 3, 2008 -> 10:01 AM) Still, if I ever see AJ strike out on that damn uppercut swing with the bases loaded or runners on 2nd and 3rd, I'm gonna go Michael Barrett on his ass. That being said, AJ is a .300 hitter when he wants to be. They commented on the radio broadcast yesterday that AJ wanted to "lead the league in hitting" this year. That may be a bit of a stretch, but hopefully it shows where his focus is going to be.

I like the way Cabrera has been playing thus far.

BLOW THIS TEAM UP, THEY SHOULD BE CALLED THE WHITE SUX! Fire KW! Fire Ozzie! Firesale starts now.

And anyone who had a flight with them.

Way to see one pitch Uribe.

Vazquez is looking great aside from those walks in the 2nd.

I'm still very, very puzzled as to why Ramirez is the starting CF.

Stone is about a 1000% improvement. Just have to mention that.

I really do not get Ramirez in CF over Quentin or Anderson. He is not a CF and its not like he has a phenomenal bat that we need to get in the lineup.

QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Apr 2, 2008 -> 01:44 PM) Being very familiar with this stuff, it is coming. There is a real push to get ALL financial institiutions regulated by one government sector. The system we have now is from the 1930's and obvious doesn't work. Its a real mess. In your opinion, is more government regulation the way to go here?

QUOTE(Texsox @ Apr 1, 2008 -> 05:21 PM) True story, I just watched my first episode of Sopranos. I hadn't seen it until last fall when I got netflix. Just finished the series last week.

QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Apr 1, 2008 -> 09:22 PM) Would you rather see the banking sector go under? Doesn't this just tell banks "Hey, don't worry about how much risk you take. If it turns out ok, you'll make billions. If not, we've got your back!"

What's the purpose?

QUOTE(BigSqwert @ Apr 1, 2008 -> 03:05 PM) see post 21 Forgive my ignorance on internet technologies, but can't they find where you followed the link from? If they saw you can from soxtalk.com, they might look into it a little more before beating down your door.

QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Apr 1, 2008 -> 01:14 PM) If you're referring to the horizontal freezers, like the ones in the foreground of this picture, that's actually not a big waste, because of thermodynamics. What happens in these freezers is that the air they cool has its density increased, via the temperature change. Basically, at constant pressure, if you decrease the temperature of a gas, you are going to decrease its density. This sets up a normal density gradient; i.e. you have warmer air above the freezers and cooler air below them. In this case, the air will not convect. And diffusion of heat, especially in air, is a slow process compared to convection. If you keep a normal density gradient, then you have very little problem with wasted energy. The freezers in the background are another story...they are vertical. When these do their job, they set up, across the door, a gradient between cold air on one side and warm air on the other. When you open the door, you're guaranteed to get air flow, because the 2 parcels of air will have different temperatures and therefore different densities. The air in the cooler will sink and will flow out the bottom if the door is opened. This is why the door is important...it allows the freezer to do its job...and this is why you shouldnt' stand with your refrigerator door open, because it induces convection. The only bad setup will be a cooler with no door but with a vertical setup. Although, this could be done well, if you introduce the cold air at the top of the cooler, expect it to flow down, and then pump the air out at the bottom of the cooler, you could set up an artificial barrier that would do the job. I meant both the vertical and horizontal ones that are open. Around here at least, a lot of the dairy and meats are in open, vertical refrigerator units that are just pouring cold air out into the aisles. I get the lack of convective heat transfer on the horizontal ones, but that doesn't take into account the ambient air flow in the building due to circulation and the motion of people, not the mention people stirring up the air by reaching in and out of the coolers with product.

Stone was great on the broadcast yesterday. Glad to be listening to him this season.

QUOTE(NorthSideSox72 @ Mar 31, 2008 -> 11:09 AM) ComEd is still doing their math, but, it appears that the reduction in electricity used during Earth Hour on Saturday night in the Chicago area resulted in a reduction of 840,000 pounds of CO2 output. That's 420 tons less CO2, which normally would need about 104 acres of forest to soak up during that period. Based on my rough math (10M in Chicagoland area, 7.5 tons/ person/ year), this area puts out about 208000 tons of CO2 a day, or 8700 tons an hour. This wasn't even a 10% reduction. One of the biggest wastes I see on a regular basis are the open freezers and refrigerators in grocery stores. Do these really need to be wide open like that?

What a horrible policy. How in the world does his own personal drawing infringe on anyone else's rights or beliefs?

QUOTE(Y2HH @ Apr 1, 2008 -> 10:06 AM) There is a demand for it, but it's an illegal demand. There are PC hacked copies of OSX out there, but obviously they aren't licensed to run on non-Mac hardware (Intel or not). I would run it, OSX is *really* nice, I may even consider buying a Mac next, simply because I could run both if I so wanted. I'm so sick of Vista it's not even funny how bad this 5+ year development OS is. Anyway, getting back on topic, it's nice that they can do both, in either case. I might consider OSX if I could run it on decent hardware that didn't cost me twice as much as a comparable PC. Until that day, I won't be buying any overpriced Mac products.

QUOTE(Athomeboy_2000 @ Apr 1, 2008 -> 09:06 AM) I got a reply this morning... Sending a letter isn't going to accomplish anything!!!!

QUOTE(BigSqwert @ Apr 1, 2008 -> 08:06 AM) So we can have a thread that's several pages long about what a pastor said but when Hillary's campaign manager was actually involved in something that has affected thousands of families in our country we aren't allowed to mention it? I thought the economy has become the #1 campaign issue. You're allowed to mention whatever you want. When you guys keep posting every single little story that comes out about Clinton, people are going to pass over a lot of those posts even if it is something seemingly important. That's all I'm saying.