MexSoxFan#1

A FG here at the least would be awesome...

what the hell got into Olsen, lol

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jan 16, 2011 -> 12:52 PM) If the Bears were playing the Packers, that penalty would just be interpreted as the Bears being lucky again.

1st and goal from the 1...YOU POUND IT IN!

Atlanta just can't stop GB.

Bandwagon fans suck

QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Jan 14, 2011 -> 04:12 PM) Naw, he really meant 'magic' as in 'Magic' Johnson. lol

QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Jan 14, 2011 -> 11:35 AM) Eh, its really hard to believe he'd have another year like last year. Possible, but unlikely at his age. +1

QUOTE (thxfrthmmrs @ Jan 14, 2011 -> 12:35 AM) For a while, the Heat looked like they could reel off 50 straight wins to tie or shatter the Bulls 72-10 record, now we can officially rule them out.... this season. By the way. Arron Afflalo looked really nice tonight and did a great job defending Wade. Both him and JR Smith had great games tonight, but I think Afflalo will be a better fit for the Bulls because he can do more with less. Just check his stats and he is something like 50-40-85 in terms of shooting %. and he NEVER turns the ball over. He would be a terrific fit with Rose and Boozer. If I were GarPax, Afflalo and Mayo are on top of my trade list for shooting guards. Oh, I'm pretty confident that record will hold for at the very least, a LONG time...it is just to hard to go through a 82 game grind and lose just 10, that is really f***ing amazing.

As a single dude, I had a 96 Honda Prelude, I own a 2011 Nissan Tiida and I would really love an Audi A7.

"Oh, he didn't pull a Jordan did he...he didn't pull an MJ"

QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Jan 12, 2011 -> 12:24 PM) Get the heck out of my neighborhood with this crap. Wade doesn't want to lose in douchieness to LBJ.

I don't think the Bears will take the Seahawks lightly, they were beaten by them earlier this season so hopefully the Bears will want some payback. I'm predicting a big game by Forte, BTW. Last week I had the Saints, Jets, Ravens and Packers...3/4 not bad. This week...Ravens, Packers, Bears and Jets.

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jan 11, 2011 -> 05:45 PM) Link That's what we need, more guns, yaaaaaaaay!!

QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Jan 11, 2011 -> 04:31 PM) Starks has one game and now the f***ing entire world wants to jizz in a Green Bay Packers sock. Let's all take it easy. +1 I've been checking out Packer forums and they are convinced they now have a running game Sorry but one good game doesn't make you a solid running team.

QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Jan 11, 2011 -> 03:47 PM) via Sullivan You stay classy, Rush

If the Seahawks don't get a heavy dose of Forte, then Martz should retire...

Not to overlook Seattle because I do think they will battle us all game long (hopefully I'm wrong and it's a Bears laugher) but I hope the Pack beat Atlanta...rather face the Packers in Soldier Field than go to Atlanta. Da Bears!!!

QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Jan 8, 2011 -> 09:34 AM) scandalous Damn right it is

QUOTE (dasox24 @ Jan 5, 2011 -> 10:47 PM) Ever since watching Hard Knocks, I thought Mark Sanchez seemed like a pretty cool guy, but he just went up another notch in my book. He's an overrated QB, but this is a really good story... http://sports.espn.go.com/new-york/nfl/news/story?id=5991920 I just became a Mark Sanchez fan. Beat Indy!!

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jan 4, 2011 -> 08:12 AM) The Heat are 2 games short of the NBA's longest road winning streak in history. I bet all 6 of their fans are really excited.

QUOTE (J.Reedfan8 @ Jan 2, 2011 -> 10:59 PM) Philly for sure. Vicks been incredible this season, but the Bears defense has actually had good success against athletic QBs this season. It's the pocket QBs that kill them for whatever reason. Plus, Sean Payton is just really good at his job. ^^This^^

QUOTE (lord chas @ Jan 2, 2011 -> 07:21 PM) got a feeling bears are going to wish they took the pack out. should be a fun few weeks I would wager anything the Packers do not make it to the NFC Championship game, that would take winning 2 on the road and they have struggled all season on the road...the pack are a good team but not good enough for 2 road wins IMO.

QUOTE (ChWRoCk2 @ Dec 30, 2010 -> 03:52 PM) When did I ever mention "super bowls" or the term "decade"? Please show me. Since I was born GB has been more successful and that is all I'm referring to, shall we take a look at the 90s? Because I'm pretty sure you wouldn't want me to. This is a pointless argument altogether when we could go back and forth picking random dates where one team was better than the other, and no I'm not saying you were better in the 2000s. I don't give a s*** that you were the last to make it to the Super Bowl you prick, did you win? Now remind me, who was the last NFC North team to make it to the Super Bowl and win because I forget? I don't visit any other forum than this one, I have better things to do. Why shouldn't they go into the season thinking they are going to win it? When you have one of the best QBs of all time in Favre and now one of the top QBs in Rodgers you should expect to win the division or go to the playoffs, if you think otherwise your a f***ing idiot. More often than not the best QBs in the league will keep their teams in playoff contention. Since you conveniently picked the 2000s, wonder why.... Playoff Appearances: Bears 4/10 Packers 6 possibly 7/10 60/70% is pretty darn good/often imo, more than 4. Well, since I was born, the Bears have been more successful, I'm guessing I'm older than you, I remember the ownage we had over the Pack from the mid 70's to the early 90's but anyways, whatever dude, go ahead and believe the Packers are vastly superior to the Bears in every which way, shape and form...in my lifetime you guys have had 2 SB appearances and won 1...same as us. I mentioned the 2000's since it's relatively recent history, that's all.

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Dec 30, 2010 -> 11:08 PM) If you see Chester Taylor in a cast, you know Lovie reads Soxtalk.