Real

First conference final game 7 OT since 1994, the year I bought my first jersey lol

Quick is a machine right now

Flip a coin, two great teams right here

QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Jun 1, 2014 -> 08:53 PM) Hawks dominated that period. 20 minutes. Limit chances. 16-4 SOG, though that's how it should be when you're getting PP after PP after PP

So f***ing huge

Soxtalk seriously needs a mobile forum!

they really need to capitalize here, like seriously

Yeah this is a bad situation now

Not a terrible 1P, 4th line needs to step up, would like to see the D they played in game 6 in front of Crawford tonight

Holy f***, hawks pulling a rabbit out of the hat

Brandon Saad, smh

QUOTE (BigHurt3515 @ May 24, 2014 -> 04:57 PM) I cant believe we lost this damn game. So pissed. you can't believe the sox lost this game? are you serious? lmao

QUOTE (RockRaines @ May 18, 2014 -> 03:35 PM) You can't review goaltender interference. Yet they did. it wasn't goal tender interference as there was no penalty called the reason this whole thing is fishy is because the original call was goal, and then overturned without consulting any replay footage There's no way any of the refs saw it clearly enough to overturn it without using replay footage, which would be required to overturn the call on the ice which was goal Fishy as f*ck

QUOTE (Soxfest @ Apr 22, 2014 -> 09:31 PM) Sox lose 8-6 .................Thanks Charlie and Downs. asexpected.gif

lololololololol hot f***ing trash

yeah, i wish we would've locked konerko up for 3-4 more years when he was hitting .400 for two months, a couple years ago .......

lol as expected

Terrible defense and bullpen? Big f***ing shocker

Lol

QUOTE (lasttriptotulsa @ Jan 22, 2014 -> 07:35 AM) The longer this has gone on, the better I've felt about the Sox' chance to land him. We all know the Sox are probably not going to offer the biggest contract and chances are if Tanaka was simply out to get the biggest contract, it probably would have been done by now. it just makes no sense why he would choose the sox play for a contender? No highest bidder? No huge fan base? No then you factor in s***ty weather, not west coast (if those rumors held any truth) to me it just doesn't seem likely, either the sox wanna say "Hey we tried!" or they're being trolled by Casey Close

well there goes my prediction! guessing LA gets him since they're printing money now

yeah it really doesn't make sense if you look at the grand scheme of things for him to pick the sox or cubs I'm still sticking to my dbacks prediction

QUOTE (bucket-of-suck @ Jan 20, 2014 -> 01:33 AM) FWIW, ...told "anyone that calls the Sox longshots in this Tanaka thing are just wrong". more like bucket of truth!

QUOTE (Frank_Thomas35 @ Jan 19, 2014 -> 04:44 AM) Ya thinking about it, 4/$100, $25 a year with a few options at the end and the chance to prove your the real deal before 30 and cash in another pay day. May interest him, or he may want 6 in order to sign. But really 4/$100 + options for 2018 and 2019 could be the Hahn magic that gets it done. His competitive drive is known and this may be the contract he wants to prove himself. Rose colored glasses You aren't thinking objectively here, 4yrs/100m would be assinine if he's getting offers for 6/120 or 7/160 or in that area Why? Because he could fall flat on his face in 3 years like Daisuke. No agent would recommend his client to take 4/100 vs 7/160 or 6/120, you don't gamble based on outperforming or even equaling your contract, you play it like you're going to flop and still get more years of premium salary 2 extra option years would most certainly have to be player options, not team or vested options Starting to think Arizona lands him

QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Jan 13, 2014 -> 07:36 PM) I would have said yes it sounds unlikely, but then Jerry dropped 70 mil on a hitter that never faced a major or minor league pitch. A hitter who plays an unathletic position 150+ games a year for 70m vs a pitcher who will get twice that IMO a poor comparison This reminds me of when we had to get buehrle to give us a discount for a contract almost half the length of the tanaka deal assuming its 20m/yr for 7 years