Jump to content

Tony Kemp expected to be DFA'd


Sleepy Harold
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, soxfan2014 said:

Ha, I never said it had to be immediately. Just that they can be traded while in the waiver period.

Not to rehash that convo...but you're wrong on that man.  Kemp just hadn't been placed on waivers yet, as the Astros had 7 days to make a decision.  If he was, and was claimed (and he definitely would have been claimed by an AL) club, the Astros would have been only able to trade him to that club, or pull him back off waivers.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ChiSox59 said:

Not to rehash that convo...but you're wrong on that man.  Kemp just hadn't been placed on waivers yet, as the Astros had 7 days to make a decision.  If he was, and was claimed (and he definitely would have been claimed by an AL) club, the Astros would have been only able to trade him to that club, or pull him back off waivers.  

Yes, the decision is ultimately letting him go for nothing, releasing him or trading him....while on waivers.

Edit: In the bolded, you're confusing that with the old August trade waivers.

Edited by soxfan2014
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, soxfan2014 said:

Yes, the decision is ultimately letting him go for nothing, releasing him or trading him....while on waivers.

Ugh.  No.  That is not how it works.  A guy cannot be traded while he is on waivers (unless you trade him to the team that claims him).  

The process is:

1) DFA player

2) Either place immediately on waivers, or attempt to trade during 7 day window, or release.

3) If acceptalbe trade is not found during 7 day period, place said player on waivers in hopes he clears and can be outrighted to AAA, or release

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ChiSox59 said:

Not to rehash that convo..but you're wrong on that man.  Kemp just hadn't been placed on waivers yet, as the Astros had 7 days to make a decision.  If he was, and was claimed (and he definitely would have been claimed by an AL) club, the Astros would have been only able to trade him to that club, or pull him back off waivers.  

Doesn't want to rehash convo. Tags guy he had convo with. 🤔

Edited by soxfan2014
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, soxfan2014 said:

Yes, the decision is ultimately letting him go for nothing, releasing him or trading him....while on waivers.

Edit: In the bolded, you're confusing that with the old August trade waivers.

Ya, that's right.  They can only trade him to that club.  I don't think they have the option to pull him back.  My bad on that.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...