Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soxtalk.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Offseason Moves - Grade em'

Featured Replies

I haven’t posted in a while, so this is a fun diversion.

Abreu extension: D+

I’d give it a B-  were it a 1 year extension.  But this clogs things up.  I’m all for avoiding “bad” clubhouse guys, but not big on players because they are “good” in the clubhouse.

Grandal signing: A-

He’s an excellent player; I just think that we had a good catcher, and 2 young catchers behind him.

Mazara trade: B

I go against the grain on this one. I give this a C+ for the player and an A for the execution.  He’s a flawed player, but they needed a RF and the Sox like this guy.  Second, the price was reasonable. Third, one thing that happens to rebuilders is that they start log-jamming prospects. This allowed the Sox to thin out the prospect ranks in an area where they had a lot of similar prospects.  Fourth, there really weren’t a lot of alternatives in the FA market.  The 2 big FA were flawed players that required long term commitments. 

Keuchel signing: B

They missed out on the guy they really needed/wanted, but after that, Keuchel is about the best they could have done.  There’s a risk that he rapidly declines, but Sox are pretty good with lefties.

Gio G signing: C+

He’s fine for a 5th starter.

EE signing: C

I think the Sox could have filled this internally and there’s a big chance he declines rapidly.

Luis Robert et al extension: A+

I assign this grade to each of the young player extensions. (okay Bummer’s was unnecessary, but that’s subsumed by the rest of them).   It’s what the Sox FO does best.

Cishek signing: C+

He’s okay.   Sox needed a bullpen arm.

Overall: B

They didn’t address 2B, which I guess means that they think Madrigal is coming in late spring or early summer. I would have liked to see some creative trades, although the Sox didn't have a lot of tangible players or even prospects that they could logically trade to trade (McCann the exception).   

 

  • Replies 78
  • Views 9.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Chicago White Sox
    Chicago White Sox

    I know this will be an unpopular opinion, but I do think Abreu’s deal was partially motivated by improving our chances to extend Robert & Moncada.  Given that we already extended the former when i

  • Abreu extension is a sneaky A. The money is too much but it sends an amazing message to the young guys and impending free agents. The Sox will take care of those who give them their all.

  • BackDoorBreach
    BackDoorBreach

    Your point is from the outlook of Collins' Dad, not the White Sox.

If we have a 2020 season, I'd be shocked if rosters aren't as big as 30.

19 hours ago, Heads22 said:

If we have a 2020 season, I'd be shocked if rosters aren't as big as 30.

Why would that make sense?

There would likely be a condensed "spring training" so you could at least see more pitchers allowed on a roster as they build up strength, for one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.