Jump to content

Yankees on Trial


Recommended Posts

half of the jury was like "what the yankees are doing is within the rules", "george steinbrenner is just doing his best to win". NO f***ING s***. The trial wasn't about if the Yankees are cheaters (they're not). It was about whether or not their ridiculous spending results in a competitive imbalance (it does).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

half of the jury was like "what the yankees are doing is within the rules", "george steinbrenner is just doing his best to win".  NO f***ING s***.  The trial wasn't about if the Yankees are cheaters (they're not).  It was about whether or not their ridiculous spending results in a competitive imbalance (it does).

whatever did they really have to waste 3 hours to air this crap?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

half of the jury was like "what the yankees are doing is within the rules", "george steinbrenner is just doing his best to win".  NO f***ING s***.  The trial wasn't about if the Yankees are cheaters (they're not).  It was about whether or not their ridiculous spending results in a competitive imbalance (it does).

The judge should have thrown out their verdict due to incompetence and ruled the way 66% of the population feels according ESPN.com's poll.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This "trial" was held in New Jersey. Eevn though some of the jurors weren't supposed to be sports fans, with the proximity location so close to the Bronx, do you really think anyone is gonna go against the hometown boys? The 2 who voted no are either:

 

A) The non-sports fans

B) Mets fans

C) Red Sox fans

 

You wanna make it fair: Put that trial in Minneapolis, Pittsburgh, Oakland, Milwaukee, or Miami. I think the result would be a helluva different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the quick clip I heard on Around the Horn, the executive producer for this trial is notorious for winning high-profile mofia cases. He's also a well known Yankees fan. If this program had any legitimacy to it (highly doubtful), these jurors were "persuaded" into a not guilty verdict.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watched bits and pieces of it.  Parts of it were solid and parts of it were lame.  Didn't watch near enough of it to make an overall statement, but it was amazing that it took up 3 hours of programming.

Yeah some of it was good, and some of it I already knew. The Pete Rose thing they had last year was MUCH more interesting. Then again, it's not a very entertaining question. Pete Rose has more controversy. Nobody likes the Yankees outside of Yankee fans, it's more split with Rose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wtf is this trial all about? I'm completely lost.. 

 

ESPN had a special on that was a "trial" to determine if the yankee's spending was creating imbalance in baseball. A prosecutor and defense attorney brought in witnesses and asked them a bunch of questions and then a jury deliberated/b****ed. In the end, 2 voted YES and 10 voted NO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ESPN had a special on that was a "trial" to determine if the yankee's spending was creating imbalance in baseball. A prosecutor and defense attorney brought in witnesses and asked them a bunch of questions and then a jury deliberated/b****ed.  In the end, 2 voted YES and 10 voted NO.

How can they justify saying no? All those all stars could be spread throughout the league, but the Yankees snatch them up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...