November 7, 200421 yr Thats not true. The pirates have practically done that-offered to basically give him to a team for a crap spec in return-no team wanted to do it. Do the yankees need a catcher? No. Have the red sox needed a catcher? No. Have the cardinals needed a catcher? No Have the mets needed a catcher? No. These are the teams i am talking about.
November 7, 200421 yr 6.?????-1B(I cant see us going with gload-he is like graffanino if u know what i mean, only a bench player, a long long shot i rogowski but if he comes on super strong up until the end of spring training he has a shot) What he has down in the minors and the majors thus far is worthy of a chance to start imo and many others.
November 7, 200421 yr Kendall for Konerko. That's $34 million vs $9.25 Million after the trade clause kicks in for PK. I'd make Pittsburg throw in one of those good young ballplayers they have for us taking all the payroll off their books.
November 7, 200421 yr What he has down in the minors and the majors thus far is worthy of a chance to start imo and many others. Yes, he is far and away my favorite minor leaguer, I think he is ready to play at the major league level and play well at the major league level. The problem is I doubt the wsox organization would be willing to push him that fast.
November 7, 200421 yr Yes, he is far and away my favorite minor leaguer, I think he is ready to play at the major league level and play well at the major league level. The problem is I doubt the wsox organization would be willing to push him that fast. weren't we talking about gload? he was up in the majors all last year? Or were we rogowski? i'm confused.
November 7, 200421 yr i wouldnt mind eating almost all of kendalls contract if they throw in that setup RP they have.... he is a stud
November 7, 200421 yr Really, I mean, I am a big fan of Kendall but konerko for kendall w/ money washing out. Konerko is better than kendall even with teh very important fact that kendall is a C. Borchard & Garland for Kendall and 7 million of his contract per year paid by pittsburgh seems logical and reasonable for both sides. If we trade Garland and Borchard for Kendall, now we have two holes in the rotation, and now - we have another huge contract on our hands. And, leaving the money aspect out of it... Kendall>>>>Konerko. Fact is, we need a more well rounded team, and while it's all well and good that Konerko crushes the ball at home, he's terrible on the road. If we can't win on the road, we won't win. I do this deal if, like Cheat said, you can get Pittsburg to eat some off of the backend of the contract.... (and you know, throw in Oliver Perez as well ).
November 7, 200421 yr i wouldnt mind eating almost all of kendalls contract if they throw in that setup RP they have.... he is a stud Are you talking about torres???
November 7, 200421 yr Are you talking about torres??? no im talking about mike gonzalez... i think thats his name.. he has the makings of being good for a long time.
November 7, 200421 yr Maybe Konerko, Garland and Diaz for Oliver Perez and Kendall? I would probally cry if that happened, to be honest with you.
November 7, 200421 yr I would probally cry if that happened, to be honest with you. Cry in a good way or in a bad way?
November 7, 200421 yr Why would you trade Oliver Perez if you are Pittsburgh? Cash strapped teams don't trade away pitchers who are good and make no money. I've read where the Pirates would consider it in order for someone to swallow Kendall's deal whole, but I don't buy it.
November 7, 200421 yr Lol, Perez isnt going anywhere, we are all just dreaming. Although mabye we could get back the Kipper???? LOL, thatd be hillarious if we got wells-kw would look like the ultimate jackass.
November 7, 200421 yr LOL, thatd be hillarious if we got wells-kw would look like the ultimate jackass. Why? He did not trade him away.
November 7, 200421 yr Ummmm .... Yes, he did. The Ritchie trade. Schueler takes credit for it. I HATED Kip Wells when he was with the Sox.
November 7, 200421 yr no im talking about mike gonzalez... i think thats his name.. he has the makings of being good for a long time. I'd take Torres or Gonzalez. Gonzalez is a stud too IMHO.
November 8, 200421 yr Schueler takes credit for it. I HATED Kip Wells when he was with the Sox. That's what i was talking about, didn't schueler start the talks with the pirates in the first place. Thought it was basically a done deal by the time kw was hired.
November 8, 200421 yr I HATED Kip Wells when he was with the Sox. Yeah, I hated him a lot at the time, to be honest I thought Kenny made a nice trade at the time-now it symbolizes the worst trade of his general managerial career.
November 8, 200421 yr Yeah, I hated him a lot at the time, to be honest I thought Kenny made a nice trade at the time-now it symbolizes the worst trade of his general managerial career. I don't know how you could have possibly thought it was a good trade at the time. It was a ridiculous trade at the time and even worse now that we look back on it.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.