August 2, 200521 yr QUOTE(ScottPodRulez22 @ Aug 1, 2005 -> 10:42 PM) or to take away a step you can go 163-1st place wins-second place loses which in this case would be 163-69-51=43
August 2, 200521 yr QUOTE(ScottPodRulez22 @ Aug 1, 2005 -> 10:42 PM) or to take away a step you can go 163-1st place wins-second place loses which in this case would be 163-69-51=43 i was gonna say that, and nice avatar
August 2, 200521 yr the way i look at is that the twins have to win almost 22 games and we have to lose 22 for the number to be even, thats a lot of games to make up, plus twins have so many injuries, i think cleveland has best chance of taking us down, but they are too young of a team to catch us
August 2, 200521 yr It's over. ..no one can catch us at this point. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> It's not over til its over, but I think your right that it is over. BRING ON THE A'S!!!
August 2, 200521 yr QUOTE(GBlum## @ Aug 2, 2005 -> 03:43 AM) Is that you wharris? Is this a permanent change? If so, long live Wille!
August 2, 200521 yr QUOTE(KevHead0881 @ Aug 1, 2005 -> 11:26 PM) Is that you wharris? Is this a permanent change? If so, long live Wille! Yessir.
August 2, 200521 yr QUOTE(ChWRoCk2 @ Aug 1, 2005 -> 11:11 PM) the way i look at is that the twins have to win almost 22 games and we have to lose 22 for the number to be even, thats a lot of games to make up, plus twins have so many injuries, i think cleveland has best chance of taking us down, but they are too young of a team to catch us That number would be 15, not 22. Look at the standings. A 15 game losing streak by the Sox corresponding with a 15 game winning streak by the Twins makes us "even".
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.