May 11, 200619 yr QUOTE(G&T @ May 11, 2006 -> 12:54 PM) That's the other problem, it's supposed to rain until Monday. Good thing the Sox will be playing in domes for the next week.
May 11, 200619 yr QUOTE(G&T @ May 11, 2006 -> 02:54 PM) That's the other problem, it's supposed to rain until Monday. Poor Cubbies.
May 11, 200619 yr its supposed to rain for like a week straight so there could be double headers and more canceled games.
May 11, 200619 yr QUOTE(GoSox05 @ May 11, 2006 -> 03:32 PM) its supposed to rain for like a week straight so there could be double headers and more canceled games. We don't play here again till 05/19.
May 11, 200619 yr Ahhh... Sox withdrawal. Mercy! After last night's collapse, maybe a day off will do us some good.
May 11, 200619 yr i have tickets to the saturday game in minny, which was going to be buehrle santana. seems like those two pitch against each other a lot and are usually pretty good games. vazquez santana should be pretty good though with the way vazquez has been pitching. against the twins offense vazquez might actually be able to finish a no hitter.
May 11, 200619 yr just think, if Ozzie was a weatherman, we could have skipped the whole Haegar the Horrible incident last night. Garland would have pitched last night on 4 days rest and Vazquez would have pitched Friday on 5 days rest. Buehrle on Saturday on 5 days rest, etc.
May 11, 200619 yr Glad i'm going to Maggiano's for dinner tonight then. God I hate the weather here sometimes.
May 11, 200619 yr Buehrle vs. Santana is about as good as it gets--I was at that game here last time around. Hey at least you can't get rained out!
May 11, 200619 yr QUOTE(LVSoxFan @ May 11, 2006 -> 05:50 PM) Buehrle vs. Santana is about as good as it gets--I was at that game here last time around. Hey at least you can't get rained out! The Sox aren't skipping Garland's start, from what I understand.
May 11, 200619 yr Ohh well, at any rate, at least I'll be able to catch up on my MLB 2K6 season on 360. On the bright side, at least there is no temptation for slip n slide.
May 11, 200619 yr QUOTE(greasywheels121 @ May 11, 2006 -> 02:55 PM) The Sox aren't skipping Garland's start, from what I understand. Garland Versus Santana has been pretty damn good before as well.
May 11, 200619 yr QUOTE(Balta1701 @ May 11, 2006 -> 06:16 PM) Garland Versus Santana has been pretty damn good before as well. Haha I remember that. Carlos hit that HR, and then we were done.
May 11, 200619 yr This really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really blows.
May 11, 200619 yr QUOTE(jasonxctf @ May 11, 2006 -> 04:28 PM) just think, if Ozzie was a weatherman, we could have skipped the whole Haegar the Horrible incident last night. Garland would have pitched last night on 4 days rest and Vazquez would have pitched Friday on 5 days rest. Buehrle on Saturday on 5 days rest, etc. Or he could have just started BMAC ( He ended up getting almost a full start's worth of work anyway ) and not spotted them 6 runs.
May 11, 200619 yr Author QUOTE(Drew @ May 11, 2006 -> 06:27 PM) Yah, I don't get why B-Mac didn't get the nod for last night's game. 1. The Sox didn't feel he was streched out enough. 2. The Sox want to see what they had in Haeger 3. The Sox felt that they didn't want to shift BMac out of the bullpen, because he hasn't sucked hard. 4. The Sox didn't want to blow out the pen if BMac didn't start, because they wouldn't have gone to Haeger in a close game. I'm not saying these are why but they could have been factors.
May 12, 200619 yr i didn't realize the twins were skipping baker's start. that means the sox see lohse in game 4. i would think they might want to throw baker out there just because the sox haven't seen much of him. with the exception of game one i think we can expect a lot of runs from the sox.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.