Business has picked up.

Awesome.

Why is Hermanson still in the game?

WHY THE f*** IS HERMIE STILL IN THERE???? OZ IS A FREAKING MORON!!!

I kinda like to believe the rookie catcher had a part in that call and ... it wasn't a close game at the time.

 

It wasn't a mop-up situation.

It wasn't a mop-up situation.

 

Ladies and gentlemen, buckle up and get ready for another roller-coaster ride. Why can't we win any game the easy way??? We just have to make every game exciting and tight!

This team just can't do it easy, can they?

Gotta tack on a few more here, can't sit on this measly lead

Ladies and gentlemen, buckle up and get ready for another roller-coaster ride. Why can't we win any game the easy way??? We just have to make every game exciting and tight!

 

 

Now I am so happy that Ozzie didn't replace Dye.

Ladies and gentlemen, buckle up and get ready for another roller-coaster ride. Why can't we win any game the easy way??? We just have to make every game exciting and tight!

 

Yep...it's amazing that you think we've had two games in the last two weeks where we were up by like 7 or 8, and the opposition ended up getting the tying run to the plate.

well, good thing we still got dye and thome out there

 

how bout a single?

Damn.

Yep...it's amazing that you think we've had two games in the last two weeks where we were up by like 7 or 8, and the opposition ended up getting the tying run to the plate.

 

Fathom, my stomach is not feeling well at all. It was doing perfectly fine about 15 minutes ago. Man, gotta gut another one out!

Yep...it's amazing that you think we've had two games in the last two weeks where we were up by like 7 or 8, and the opposition ended up getting the tying run to the plate.

 

Indeed.

 

I wonder if Oz is going to keep the starters out there a little bit longer now.

Fathom, my stomach is not feeling well at all. It was doing perfectly fine about 15 minutes ago. Man, gotta gut another one out!

 

I already told my fiance that if we lose this game, I'm not going out.

Yep...it's amazing that you think we've had two games in the last two weeks where we were up by like 7 or 8, and the opposition ended up getting the tying run to the plate.

 

That also means like you've said our non-relievers STINK big time.

 

Which also means if and when we get in the postseason, we will never see them again until next year.

Edited September 10, 200619 yr by S720

That also means like you've said our non-relievers STINK big time.

 

Yes they do...they're pitching with no guts or intensity.

Indeed.

 

I wonder if Oz is going to keep the starters out there a little bit longer now.

I had no problem with taking Garland out, I mean who could have seen this debacle coming.

I sincerely hope Guillen isn't considering bringing Jenks out tonight. Give him rest. It's obvious something is wrong.

 

I noticed MacDougal is warming as well. He should be closing the game, not pitching in the 8th. Have Thornton pitch then.

I had no problem with taking Garland out, I mean who could have seen this debacle coming.

 

he was at 106 pitches with a 9 run league... I don't think any sane manager would have left him in...

I sincerely hope Guillen isn't considering bringing Jenks out tonight. Give him rest. It's obvious something is wrong.

 

I noticed MacDougal is warming as well. He should be closing the game, not pitching in the 8th. Have Thornton pitch then.

 

MacDougal the 8th, then Thornton the 9th.

 

Here we go guys. Strap it up and get ready for a turbulent ride! Damn, I hate this!

Indeed.

 

I wonder if Oz is going to keep the starters out there a little bit longer now.

Garland had 106 pitches.

 

I have no problem with Guillen removing him and finding work for Logan, considering Cleveland trailed by 9 runs.

And the middle of our order go 1-2-3. I Seriously hope we hang onto this game, if only for my mental health

I had no problem with taking Garland out, I mean who could have seen this debacle coming.

 

I don't disagree at all with taking him out. Just saying after seeing the pen be real itchy as of late, if he'll stick with the starters longer than he normally would.

 

Then again he doesn't panic...

MacDougal the 8th, then Thornton the 9th.

 

Here we go guys. Strap it up and get ready for a turbulent ride! Damn, I hate this!

I have a problem with this considering MacDougal has closing experience and has pitched far better than Thornton in the period since his arrival.

 

It's not like chosing between MacDougal and Cotts -- both Mac and Thornton are good pitchers -- but I'd give the advantage to Mike in a high leverage situation such as the 9th.