Come on Jenks.

I never understood this. I hope it works out, but I never understood this move.

ya. Probably better to just go to your best guy here and really put it out there to steal a win.

For the last few years, we've had a reliever who was very good one year, and sucked beyond belief the next year. Let's hope Thornton isn't that player this year.

QUOTE(Reddy @ Apr 5, 2007 -> 03:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

lol.

 

sorry i didnt type anything but A) yes i was a little leary after yesterday and B ) i was in the middle of saying that Thornton was having control issues lately and C) i posted RIGHT at the top of the inning that he hasnt looked dominating all spring.

 

owned.

 

Owned? RETARDED!

 

Saying he hasn't looked dominating all spring does not = he should have left MacDougal in. The rest of your nonsense is garbage that deserves no response.

 

Meaning, you can say whatever you want, making claims of what you have and haven't said, and I really have no way of proving you right or wrong, so it's a useless statement. In either case, back to the game...

Thorton>>>>Cotts

 

Michaels against any LHP = bad matchup, period!

lol.

 

sorry i didnt type anything but A) yes i was a little leary after yesterday and B ) i was in the middle of saying that Thornton was having control issues lately and C) i posted RIGHT at the top of the inning that he hasnt looked dominating all spring.

 

owned.

 

None of our pitchers looked dominating in spring...

90 mph

Hitting the low 90's.

QUOTE(fathom @ Apr 5, 2007 -> 03:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

For the last few years, we've had a reliever who was very good one year, and sucked beyond belief the next year. Let's hope Thornton isn't that player this year.

 

I'm with you. I sure hope he straightens is act up.

Michaels against any LHP = bad matchup, period!

 

Just like in game 3 last year (good memory Nach), Jenks should have been in to face Michaels (or Nixon).

Meaning, you can say whatever you want, making claims of what you have and haven't said, and I really have no way of proving you right or wrong, so it's a useless statement. In either case, back to the game...

Well, you could search my post history, it is a message board.

Hitting the low 90's.

 

MLB Gameday had a couple of the fastballs at 95mph

QUOTE(joeynach @ Apr 5, 2007 -> 03:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Michaels against any LHP = bad matchup, period!

 

agreed, understood, just saying I wouldn't compare Cotts to Thorton, but I know what you mean.

topped at 95 mph

DO IT.

Ground out to iguchi, inning over.

Ok, we got out of that jam, lets see if we can get a run or two this inning.

Attaway boys.

Just like in game 3 last year (good memory Nach), Jenks should have been in to face Michaels (or Nixon).

 

Yes sir I remember cuz we threw a fit on the board cuz we knew the numbers and knew Michaels dominated LHP and Ozzie said he didn't know that until after we lost the game and it was brought to his attention.

Well, you could search my post history, it is a message board.

 

and that is worth my time how?

Someone on our offense, man the f*** up and get a run. Please.

2,3,4 due up.

 

This is the situation we want.

 

 

Although I HATE bobby going into another inning when its freezing outside.

None of our pitchers looked dominating in spring...

Except Boone Logan

QUOTE(Maverick0984 @ Apr 5, 2007 -> 03:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

and that is worth my time how?

 

You started the crap. Let it be. Rock barely ever complains about anything. Now shut the f up.