NM Results are finally in...

Obama - 71,396

Clinton - 73,105

Total Votes - 149,779 votes

This state does not matter...according to the Clintons' take on caucuses. But I'm sure she will tell us what a great win this was.

Obama may score the full SEIU endorsement.

In the meantime he did score the United Food and Commercial Workers Union endorsement.

This state does not matter...according to the Clintons' take on caucuses. But I'm sure she will tell us what a great win this was.

She already did...

http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=5988

 

She already did...

http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=5988

Oh I get it. Only caucuses she wins matter. The other ones are not a true representation of the voters of that particular state. GMAFB

Oh I get it. Only caucuses she wins matter. The other ones are not a true representation of the voters of that particular state. GMAFB

If you saw my post earlier, only states she wins (except Illinois) are significant.

Isn't it possible that hte Clintons are running a solid campaign but Obama is just running a better one? I'll submit this as evidence of that claim:

There's no doubt that Clinton is running a solid campaign. I was in her corner until about six months ago, when I apparently started drinking lots of Kool-Aid.

There's no doubt that Clinton is running a solid campaign. I was in her corner until about six months ago, when I apparently started drinking lots of Kool-Aid.

You're in Minnesota, so you don't count anyways.

This provided a decent amount of entertainment for a minute or so.

 

http://barackobamaisyournewbicycle.com/

You're in Minnesota, so you don't count anyways.

I don't count for a few reasons.

 

1. Caucuses

 

2. "Only" 10 Electoral Votes

 

3. My precinct went 74%-26% Obama.

 

 

By the way I think we'll be seeing more of this in the coming weeks then the other way around.

More evidence.

I don't count for a few reasons.

 

1. Caucuses

 

2. "Only" 10 Electoral Votes

 

3. My precinct went 74%-26% Obama.

 

 

in my book the individual matters even MORE in a caucus.

A few interesting articles from the Economist;

 

http://www.economist.com/opinion/displayst...ory_id=10697083

 

http://www.economist.com/opinion/displayst...ory_id=10689547

"Yes We Can" the video:

http://www.dipdive.com/

Isn't it possible that hte Clintons are running a solid campaign but Obama is just running a better one? I'll submit this as evidence of that claim:

 

The votes claim might mean something, but the delegate count comparison is worthless between parties, because the Dems seat 4049 delegates while the Repubs seat 2380.

 

 

The party would implode if that were to occur.

 

I think it could also implode if the superdelegates go against the wishes of the people.

uh oh! Texas Poll....

 

Clinton - 54

Obama - 38

uh oh! Texas Poll....

 

Clinton - 54

Obama - 38

And there's this one.

And there's this one.

I hate polls. so inaccurite

I hate polls. so inaccurite

There's still 2 and half weeks until March 4th. He is focusing his efforts on the upcoming primaries/caucuses in Wisconsin and Hawaii. Starting next Tuesday he will be visiting Texas, Ohio, Rhode Island and Vermont. Generally, the more exposure he has the more people like him.

Edited February 15, 200818 yr by BigSqwert

Generally, the more exposure he has the more people like him.

You're preaching to the choir

You're preaching to the choir

My point is that the polls today are not a good snap shot of what will likely occur 2 weeks from Tuesday. She was up in Maine by 37 points not too long ago and we saw what happened there.

There's a lot of sentiment that Republicans by the masses are going to cross and vote Obama. The Hillary hate here is pretty big.

 

I know I'm going to go vote and it's going to be for Obama, and Mrs. Kap's doing the same thing. Neither of us would vote for him in the general, but no one wants another Clinton near the White House.

 

Really, Texas is a difficult state for both, if you think about it. I think it's sad that it's that way, but it's true.

 

So, my line get's to be, I voted for Obama, before I voted against him.

You guys really do believe Obama is going to beat the Clinton machine, don't you? One of two things will happen.

 

1. Some way, shape or form the Machine will wheel and deal to get the nomination. They'll offer Obama the VP so they can put the token n***** in his place after the inauguration. I predict race riots if this happens.

 

2. Obama gets the nomination and Hillary gets VP. A few months into his term, so "white racist skinhead" assasinates Obama. Net Result: Hillary can be POTUS for 11.5 years.

 

I'm leaning toward number 2 as the most likely scenario.

 

Edit to add: I literally typed in n star star star star star ... I just feel the would be the actual Clinton perspective and used that to make that point.

Edited February 15, 200818 yr by YASNY

You guys really do believe Obama is going to beat the Clinton machine, don't you? One of two things will happen.

 

1. Some way, shape or form the Machine will wheel and deal to get the nomination. They'll offer Obama the VP so they can put the token n***** in his place after the inauguration. I predict race riots if this happens.

 

2. Obama gets the nomination and Hillary gets VP. A few months into his term, so "white racist skinhead" assasinates Obama. Net Result: Hillary can be POTUS for 11.5 years.

 

I'm leaning toward number 2 as the most likely scenario.

I'm leaning towards this being one of the most offensive and ridiculous posts I've read in some time.

 

EDIT: N star star star star star helps a bit, but it's still a ridiculous post.

Edited February 15, 200818 yr by Steve9347

I'm leaning towards this being one of the most offensive and ridiculous posts I've read in some time.

 

EDIT: N star star star star star helps a bit, but it's still a ridiculous post.

 

Just wait.