April 26, 200817 yr QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Apr 26, 2008 -> 05:38 PM) Nope. Flacco and Ryan are the only 2 QB's off the board. Thanks. I really can't remember half of these picks. All the trades really throw me off.
April 26, 200817 yr QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Apr 26, 2008 -> 05:40 PM) Well, the Skins certainly needed a WR. Still have a shot at Kelly, maybe Sweed if they're interested. What?!!! They just traded for Brandon Lloyd, like, a couple years ago! Oh, wait...
April 26, 200817 yr Damn. If Flowers went to GB, I had this whole, Hey shorty! It's your birthday!, post to put up. This just blows...
April 26, 200817 yr QUOTE (ChWRoCk2 @ Apr 26, 2008 -> 03:41 PM) WHAT?!? Not that I care, didn't want Flowers, please no QB GB. I wouldn't be surprised if GB grabbed one, but I think they'll bet on finding quality in late round 2 or round 3 if they do so.
April 26, 200817 yr QUOTE (zenryan @ Apr 26, 2008 -> 03:43 PM) Brohm is really dropping. I'm not sure I see a team before Chicago/Detroit that might take him. Atlanta and Baltimore already drafted them, maybe S.F. depending on how they feel about Smith, NOLA has Brees, The Bills have Edwards, the Broncos have Cutler, Philly drafted 1 in the 2nd last year.
April 26, 200817 yr f*** this draft, we have Driver, Jones and Jennings, are future is set, don't need a wide receiver. Stupid pick, shouldve took Sweed if anyone. Just bugs me that WR isnt a weakness and we take one. Edited April 26, 200817 yr by ChWRoCk2
April 26, 200817 yr QUOTE (ChWRoCk2 @ Apr 26, 2008 -> 05:46 PM) f*** this draft, we have Driver, Jones and Jennings, are future is set, don't need a wide receiver. Stupid pick, shouldve took Sweed if anyone. Well...and this is being serious...Driver's good, but I wouldn't call him the "future".
April 26, 200817 yr QUOTE (ChWRoCk2 @ Apr 26, 2008 -> 03:46 PM) f*** this draft, we have Driver, Jones and Jennings, are future is set, don't need a wide receiver. Stupid pick, shouldve took Sweed if anyone. Just bugs me that WR isnt a weakness and we take one. Didn't make sense to me either.
April 26, 200817 yr QUOTE (ChWRoCk2 @ Apr 26, 2008 -> 05:46 PM) f*** this draft, we have Driver, Jones and Jennings, are future is set, don't need a wide receiver. Stupid pick, shouldve took Sweed if anyone. Just bugs me that WR isnt a weakness and we take one. Did you really think they were going to grab someone who is going to make an immediate impact right away for next year? This is a 13 win team that has very few holes and went with the player that they felt was the best on their board at this point. Ted Thompson may seem a bit crazy. However, he has turned the team around in a short amount of time. I wouldn't get too upset about the pick.
April 26, 200817 yr QUOTE (jackie hayes @ Apr 26, 2008 -> 05:48 PM) Well...and this is being serious...Driver's good, but I wouldn't call him the "future". True, just not my first choice, I would have much rather had them take Fred Davis. Or the best available in Sweed.
April 26, 200817 yr QUOTE (ChWRoCk2 @ Apr 26, 2008 -> 05:51 PM) True, just not my first choice, I would have much rather had them take Fred Davis. Or the best available in Sweed. Yeah, I agree, Jordy's an odd choice.
April 26, 200817 yr QUOTE (SoxFanForever @ Apr 26, 2008 -> 05:49 PM) Did you really think they were going to grab someone who is going to make an immediate impact right away for next year? This is a 13 win team that has very few holes and went with the player that they felt was the best on their board at this point. Ted Thompson may seem a bit crazy. However, he has turned the team around in a short amount of time. I wouldn't get too upset about the pick. No I didn't think whomever they drafted would make an immediate impact but this Neilsen guy is gonna be buried on the depth for next year, a pick such as Fred Davis makes more sense and he could possibly start over Donald Lee. Still have two more 2nd rounders so I'll have to wait and see, I'd expect a cb/te/rb/qb. Edited April 26, 200817 yr by ChWRoCk2
April 26, 200817 yr QUOTE (ChWRoCk2 @ Apr 26, 2008 -> 05:52 PM) No I didn't think whomever they drafted would make an immediate impact but this Neilsen guy is gonna be buried on the depth for next year, a pick such as Fred Davis makes more sense and he could possibly start over Donald Lee. Still have two more 2nd rounders so I'll have to wait and see, I'd expect a cb/te/rb/qb. I like Davis as well. However, I don't think he is good enough right now to start over Lee. If they did grab Davis though it would be nice to see some 2 TE sets with Lee and Davis that would really give defenses trouble.
April 26, 200817 yr QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Apr 26, 2008 -> 06:07 PM) Bills have to take either Sweed or Kelly or Hardy here. Hardy. But given that this is the team that took McCargo, I was just about to disagree with this.
April 26, 200817 yr Sweed, Henne, Brohm, Charles -- lots of good choices here. So the Bears will of course take someone I've never heard of.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.