September 2, 200817 yr So is there any real report on how Mike was looking at AAA before he got called up? I have seen his numbers over the last month or so, but those don't always tell the real story? Is his fastball back? Is his control there at all? Any chance he can be close to his former self and give us another reliable right handed set up guy in case Linebrink isn't 100%?
September 2, 200817 yr Only the report from the newspaper reports on call ups. He had more K's than innings pitched and the Sox were impressed with his turnaround. The story either on the Tribune or Sun-Times website said that Mac had asked for a trade when he was sent down. The Sox wouldn't and are now happy with his turnaround. He apparently is happy too. He was making $2.65M at AAA with one more year on his contract.
September 2, 200817 yr I heard he has been good as of late in AAA 31/12 K/BB ratio and 1.59 ERA in 22.2 IP since the all-star break.
September 2, 200817 yr MacDougall has really turned things around as of late and he looked absolutely phenomenal last night. He could turn into a major factor with the Sox bullpen getting crap figured out and inevitably with the Sox making the playoffs. I say that because a MacDougall that pitches close to his potential immediately becomes the Sox 2nd or 3rd best reliever (Thorty/Jenks).
September 2, 200817 yr Author QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Sep 2, 2008 -> 02:05 PM) MacDougall has really turned things around as of late and he looked absolutely phenomenal last night. He could turn into a major factor with the Sox bullpen getting crap figured out and inevitably with the Sox making the playoffs. I say that because a MacDougall that pitches close to his potential immediately becomes the Sox 2nd or 3rd best reliever (Thorty/Jenks). MM pitching like he did at his best is second only to Jenks in our pen, IMO.
September 2, 200817 yr QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Sep 2, 2008 -> 03:07 PM) MM pitching like he did at his best is second only to Jenks in our pen, IMO. When he's throwing strikes, the level of nasty is off the charts. Everything dances.
September 2, 200817 yr From what I seen he has a new delivery as well. He is looking more at the catcher on his release than the ground as he use to.
September 2, 200817 yr He looked like he had put on weight. I am not sure if it was his toned down delivery or what but I thought he looked really good. Logan looked good as well. Wasserman got hit hard but right at people. I think McDougal would make it over Russell if there is even a glimmer of hope that there is the 2006 McDougal out there.
September 2, 200817 yr I think you had to be up before sept 1 to be eligible for the playoffs but I'm not the expert. Also he looked great yesterday but I'm not ready to see him in any important situations just yet. He might be able to play the role of luis vizcaino who was exceptionally good after he was reduced to meaningless innings/ extra innings when there was nobody else
September 2, 200817 yr I've never ever ever liked MacDougal. Awesome stuff, but never liked his delivery, which has led to injury problems, and his obvious control issues ... but yesterday was a different pitcher. The path of his delivery seemed identical, which is still annoying, but it was MUCH more controlled and fluid. With his stuff, that's what he needs to do. Stay relaxed, go to the plate and let talent do the rest. It was very nice to see him yesterday, granted it was only for three batters. Still, throwing with your team down a few runs and pitching in a tight game or with a lead are two different scenarios. Not sure if MacDougal is capable of handling those situations consistently. Yesterday was encouraging, especially considering how he's been the butt of a lot of people's jokes.
September 2, 200817 yr QUOTE (EvilJester99 @ Sep 2, 2008 -> 02:38 PM) From what I seen he has a new delivery as well. He is looking more at the catcher on his release than the ground as he use to. I didn't see the game. Did his velocity drop with a different delivery?
September 2, 200817 yr QUOTE (ptatc @ Sep 2, 2008 -> 04:18 PM) I didn't see the game. Did his velocity drop with a different delivery? I don't recall his velocity but he had good movement but most importantly was he was throwing strikes consistanly. Edited September 2, 200817 yr by EvilJester99
September 2, 200817 yr QUOTE (Heads22 @ Sep 2, 2008 -> 08:28 PM) When he's throwing strikes, the level of nasty is off the charts. Everything dances. I believe I have heard that from past stories too. His stuff is so nasty that Cooper said no one should be able to touch the guy, but it was his control and confidence that were the problems
September 2, 200817 yr he hangs that breaking ball too much for my liking. got away with one last night, too. still...he came right back with a 95mph heater that tied him up. That's macdougal.
September 3, 200817 yr QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Sep 2, 2008 -> 02:07 PM) MM pitching like he did at his best is second only to Jenks in our pen, IMO. Maybe 2005 Bobby Jenks, but current Bobby Jenks has nothing on MacDougal when he is going good.
September 3, 200817 yr QUOTE (BearSox @ Sep 2, 2008 -> 11:02 PM) Maybe 2005 Bobby Jenks, but current Bobby Jenks has nothing on MacDougal when he is going good. Jenks at his best is one of the best 5 bullpen arms in the league
September 3, 200817 yr QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Sep 3, 2008 -> 12:16 AM) Jenks at his best is one of the best 5 bullpen arms in the league Dont bother, Bearsox thinks MacDougals potential trumps all
September 3, 200817 yr He looked good yeah, but I don't trust him at all yet. Someone coming up from the Minors and contributing would be a godsend right now.
September 3, 200817 yr When MacDougal throws 97 with more movement than any fastball I've ever seen in the strike zone, I don't know how anyone hits it.
September 3, 200817 yr QUOTE (RockRaines @ Sep 3, 2008 -> 02:41 PM) this impression is pretty good touche
September 4, 200817 yr QUOTE (Molto @ Sep 2, 2008 -> 05:13 PM) Still, throwing with your team down a few runs and pitching in a tight game or with a lead are two different scenarios. Not sure if MacDougal is capable of handling those situations consistently. Yesterday was encouraging, especially considering how he's been the butt of a lot of people's jokes. The Sox problems lately have been pitchers coming in with leads and them blowing them. So if it takes a 2 or 3 run lead for him to be comfortable, great! The Sox get that often enough and blow it. maybe he can change that into a positive.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.