April 15, 200916 yr QUOTE (JPN366 @ Apr 15, 2009 -> 05:09 PM) Okay, here's a list of available numbers not assigned to someone on the 40 man roster or a coach below #59... 1, 6, 27, 30, 33, 35, 39, 49, 51, 58 You can remove 35 from that list. Edited April 15, 200916 yr by kev211
April 16, 200916 yr QUOTE (JPN366 @ Apr 15, 2009 -> 05:09 PM) Okay, here's a list of available numbers not assigned to someone on the 40 man roster or a coach below #59... 1, 6, 27, 30, 33, 35, 39, 49, 51, 58 any reason why Ricky Seilheimer was the last sox player to wear #6?
April 16, 200916 yr QUOTE (earthshiner @ Apr 15, 2009 -> 11:05 PM) any reason why Ricky Seilheimer was the last sox player to wear #6? I've heard there are secret plans to retire the number in honor of Jorge Orta.
April 16, 200916 yr QUOTE (JPN366 @ Apr 15, 2009 -> 04:09 PM) Okay, here's a list of available numbers not assigned to someone on the 40 man roster or a coach below #59... 1, 6, 27, 30, 33, 35, 39, 49, 51, 58 Am I the only one that thinks #'s held by minor leaguers on the 40-man roster should be available to anyone that needs a number on the major league roster? For example, it kinda sucks we won't be seeing players wear numbers such as 24 and 48 for a while, even though the players currently holding those numbers are worthy.
April 30, 200916 yr Pods actually talked about #22 on Waddle & Silvy. He said he is superstitious and wants his old # back, so he wants to talk with Josh about it. But he said he doesn't want to make a big deal of it if Josh doesn't want to give it up.
April 30, 200916 yr Josh is a real nice guy, so I'm sure he wouldn't have a problem with it.. So hopefully... Josh goes back to 27 (his rookie year number) He was really impressive that year.
April 30, 200916 yr QUOTE (Ron @ Apr 30, 2009 -> 04:03 PM) Pods actually talked about #22 on Waddle & Silvy. He said he is superstitious and wants his old # back, so he wants to talk with Josh about it. But he said he doesn't want to make a big deal of it if Josh doesn't want to give it up. He already made too big of a deal about it, so there goes that.
April 30, 200916 yr I don't know why but something about our starting 3B possibly giving up his number to a guy who was just signed to a minor league contract 2 weeks ago and hasn't done anything of note in the big leagues since 2005 rubs me the wrong way. I'm sure Josh will give up his number, I don't think he has much of a choice, that's a tough position to be in for a young ballplayer.
April 30, 200916 yr QUOTE (Kalapse @ Apr 30, 2009 -> 04:11 PM) I don't know why but something about our starting 3B possibly giving up his number to a guy who was just signed to a minor league contract 2 weeks ago and hasn't done anything of note in the big leagues since 2005 rubs me the wrong way. I'm sure Josh will give up his number, I don't think he has much of a choice, that's a tough position to be in for a young ballplayer. agree with all of the above Edited April 30, 200916 yr by BigSqwert
April 30, 200916 yr QUOTE (qwerty @ Apr 30, 2009 -> 04:10 PM) He already made too big of a deal about it, so there goes that. "I might bring it up to him but it's not a big deal either way, doesn't really matter what number is on my back, I'm just happy to be back in Chicago." Was that so hard?
April 30, 200916 yr Author QUOTE (Kalapse @ Apr 30, 2009 -> 03:11 PM) I don't know why but something about our starting 3B possibly giving up his number to a guy who was just signed to a minor league contract 2 weeks ago and hasn't done anything of note in the big leagues since 2005 rubs me the wrong way. I'm sure Josh will give up his number, I don't think he has much of a choice, that's a tough position to be in for a young ballplayer. How could you?
May 1, 200916 yr Don't give in Josh. It's your number now. Why should he give up his number to Pods of all people? Josh is our starter and deserves whatever number he wants. A washed up bum like podsednik has no right to take it from Josh.
May 1, 200916 yr QUOTE (JPN366 @ May 1, 2009 -> 02:26 PM) Scott Podsednik, uniform #1. What will Derrick Rose think?
May 1, 200916 yr QUOTE (JPN366 @ May 1, 2009 -> 01:26 PM) Scott Podsednik, uniform #1. Seriously? I suppose that is a hint of some kind about where in the lineup he expects to hit.
May 1, 200916 yr QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ May 1, 2009 -> 03:08 PM) Seriously? I suppose that is a hint of some kind about where in the lineup he expects to hit. That's what it says on his MLB.com page but I doubt he's had a chance to speak to Fields before today.
May 2, 200916 yr I thought #1 was retired by the White Sox? Or am I confusing it with some of the other retired numbers? :-S
May 2, 200916 yr QUOTE (SouthsideDon48 @ May 1, 2009 -> 07:24 PM) I thought #1 was retired by the White Sox? Or am I confusing it with some of the other retired numbers? :-S Lance Johnson is the last guy I remember having that number for an extended period.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.