How do they overrule that call? It was called a td on the field, the side judge was standing right there, and the one angle clearly showed the receiver getting a foot down. You could even see dust in the field turf being kicked up from the receiver dragging his foot. Again, how do you overrule that?

His foot was not down. That was clear when it was in slow motion. Just because the guy was right there doesn't make the call right. See 2009 MLB playoffs, umpires.

 

Stansi needs to sit down.

Once again another close call goes to Iowa. That was an incomplete pass.

 

Edit: It's closer than I thought.

Edited October 31, 200916 yr by WilliamTell

His foot was not down. That was clear when it was in slow motion. Just because the guy was right there doesn't make the call right. See 2009 MLB playoffs, umpires.

 

Stansi needs to sit down.

 

 

 

I thought I saw a line in the field/rubber from where the WR's toe was dragging.

 

Indiana has been f***ed over a lot this year by the refs. I'm sure the Big Ten will do everything possible to protect Iowa today.

Once again another close call goes to Iowa. That was an incomplete pass.

And was ruled one as well.

I thought I saw a line in the field/rubber from where the WR's toe was dragging.

 

Indiana has been f***ed over a lot this year by the refs. I'm sure the Big Ten will do everything possible to protect Iowa today.

If you have a dvr you should go back and see it. As a Iowa alum I was afraid that was going to be the case, but his foot was in the air, he eventually dragged it, but he had already landed out of bounds.

I guess leading with your shoulder is now a 15 yard penalty. Indiana has to beat both Iowa and the Big 10 officials today.

And Iowa benefits from a bulls*** unnecessary roughness penalty again.

LOL at Ricky Stanzi. BWHHAHAAHAHA

I guess leading with your shoulder is now a 15 yard penalty. Indiana has to beat both Iowa and the Big 10 officials today.

Helmet to helmet. It was an easy call.

His foot was not down. That was clear when it was in slow motion. Just because the guy was right there doesn't make the call right. See 2009 MLB playoffs, umpires.

 

Stansi needs to sit down.

 

You didn't see his foot dragging? You didn't see the dust/dirt kicked up from the field turf? It was clear from the side angle that his toe dragged. Mark Jones saw it, Bob Davie saw it, the side judge saw it...I guess they raised a question of whether or not the toe was down before the knee, but his toe definitely dragged.

I'm not going to argue with the 15 yard penalty. Never think it should be called in a play like that, but it was helmet to helmet.

LOL at Ricky Stanzi. BWHHAHAAHAHA

Yeah...and someone on this board said he was the best senior QB in the Big Ten.

Helmet to helmet. It was an easy call.

 

Just because helmets hit each other does not make it a penalty. If it was there would be personal fouls on a ton of tackles.

Yeah...and someone on this board said he was the best senior QB in the Big Ten.

 

Isn't he a junior?

Yeah...and someone on this board said he was the best senior QB in the Big Ten.

 

He is only a JR.

You didn't see his foot dragging? You didn't see the dust/dirt kicked up from the field turf? It was clear from the side angle that his toe dragged. Mark Jones saw it, Bob Davie saw it, the side judge saw it...I guess they raised a question of whether or not the toe was down before the knee, but his toe definitely dragged.

As I wrote, it dragged but he had already landed out of bounds. If he had his toe on the ground when his body landed, it would have been a TD, but it was in the air, and they can stop it frame by frame which is a little better look than the side judge at full speed no matter what Bob Davie says. I'm sure when he coached he complained about calls made by officials in far better position to see the play then him, but they do make mistakes.

Dick Allen, are you from Iowa? If so, where at?

Just because helmets hit each other does not make it a penalty. If it was there would be personal fouls on a ton of tackles.

Here's the rule. It was a penalty

 

NCAA- College

 

2008 & Still Current

 

Initiating Contact/Targeting an Oppenent

1. No player shall initiate contact and target an opponent with the crown (top) of his helmet. When in question, it is a foul.

2. No player shall initiate contact and target a defenseless opponent above the shoulders. When in question, it is a foul.

 

 

Dick Allen, are you from Iowa? If so, where at?

No. I am an Iowa alum.

No. I am an Iowa alum.

 

Yeah I read that, I just figured since the majority of Iowa students are from Iowa I'd ask you if you're from here.

Edited October 31, 200916 yr by WilliamTell

Yeah I read that, I just figured since the majority of Iowa students are from Iowa I'd ask you if you're from there.

I'm from the other part of the student body, the Chicago suburbs.

I'm from the other part of the student body, the Chicago suburbs.

 

That's cool. Glad you have Iowa Pride! I just don't get into Iowa football for whatever reason. Probably because I have too many annoying Iowa rooting friends.

Here's the rule. It was a penalty

 

NCAA- College

 

2008 & Still Current

 

Initiating Contact/Targeting an Oppenent

1. No player shall initiate contact and target an opponent with the crown (top) of his helmet. When in question, it is a foul.

2. No player shall initiate contact and target a defenseless opponent above the shoulders. When in question, it is a foul.

 

Really because he didn't target the opponent with the crown of his helmet or initiate contact and target a defenseless opponent above the shoulder.

Really because he didn't target the opponent with the crown of his helmet or initiate contact and target a defenseless opponent above the shoulder.

He did both. What exactly were you watching? 93 yd TD. Go Hawks

Well this isn't good for Indiana. 24-21 now.