Ok, here's where I think the grey area is:

 

Yes, Crede's stats were good for 2009...... but he only played in 90 games.

 

I'd rather have someone who can play 150 games or so and not have to worry about constant DL stints.

 

I understand that crede most likely won't top 100 games in 2010, but his d is good enough to provide value even in a small amount of games.

Edited December 25, 200916 yr by MattZakrowski

I understand that crede most likely won't top 100 games in 2010, but his d is good enough to provide value even in a small amount of games.

I love Crede, but his back is a mess, and there's no guarantee he'll play 10 games in 2010 let alone 100.

 

Ok, here's where I think the grey area is:

 

Yes, Crede's stats were good for 2009...... but he only played in 90 games.

 

I'd rather have someone who can play 150 games or so and not have to worry about constant DL stints.

 

We can all agree with this. Problem is you said Teahen was a better defensive 3B than Joe Crede. Sorry, that's like saying Shaq is a better FT shooter than Steve Nash.

Edited December 25, 200916 yr by Jordan4life

The numbers are the numbers? The only reason why someone like Crede has numbers that look good is because Crede only played in 90 games last year, a fact that a lot of people seem to ignore.

Read the post I was responding to, please.