February 8, 201016 yr http://www.baseball-intellect.com/Articles...kham-swing.html Arod and Gordon thoughts? beckham is not a roider so obvs. he's not going to produce the same power as aroid, but man are their swings pretty. check em' out. DISCLAIMER: many of you have probably seen this already Edited February 8, 201016 yr by ozzfest
February 9, 201016 yr QUOTE (ozzfest @ Feb 8, 2010 -> 02:32 PM) http://www.baseball-intellect.com/Articles...kham-swing.html Arod and Gordon thoughts? beckham is not a roider so obvs. he's not going to produce the same power as aroid, but man are their swings pretty. check em' out. DISCLAIMER: many of you have probably seen this already Like any of us know that.
February 9, 201016 yr QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ Feb 8, 2010 -> 08:38 PM) Like any of us know that. Yeah, other than Frank Thomas, I give up guessing who is and isn't roiding.
February 9, 201016 yr QUOTE (whitesoxfan101 @ Feb 8, 2010 -> 09:06 PM) Yeah, other than Frank Thomas, I give up guessing who is and isn't roiding. My thoughts exactly. Him and Craig Counsel.
February 9, 201016 yr QUOTE (Markbilliards @ Feb 9, 2010 -> 01:48 AM) My thoughts exactly. Him and Craig Counsel. I add Ken Griffey, Jr. on that list.
February 9, 201016 yr Author Milkman Delivers, if you doubt the integrity of baseball to the point you think Beckham is a roider, and you still watch games, mad props to you.....if i thought EVERYONE was on steroids theres no way in hell I'd watch with any degree of enjoyment..props
February 9, 201016 yr QUOTE (ozzfest @ Feb 9, 2010 -> 12:11 AM) Milkman Delivers, if you doubt the integrity of baseball to the point you think Beckham is a roider, and you still watch games, mad props to you.....if i thought EVERYONE was on steroids theres no way in hell I'd watch with any degree of enjoyment..props If everyone was on roids it'd be perfect, but the problem is that some are and some aren't.
February 9, 201016 yr Hadn't seen that. That's an eerily similar swing. Now Gordon, go put up crazy A-Rod numbers
February 9, 201016 yr QUOTE (ozzfest @ Feb 9, 2010 -> 01:11 AM) Milkman Delivers, if you doubt the integrity of baseball to the point you think Beckham is a roider, and you still watch games, mad props to you.....if i thought EVERYONE was on steroids theres no way in hell I'd watch with any degree of enjoyment..props I don't think everyone is on steroids. I just don't know who is.
February 9, 201016 yr Author QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ Feb 9, 2010 -> 07:20 AM) I don't think everyone is on steroids. I just don't know who is. ill respect that. the point of the post though was to compare the swings. btw herbert perry is awesome
February 9, 201016 yr QUOTE (ozzfest @ Feb 9, 2010 -> 01:52 PM) ill respect that. the point of the post though was to compare the swings. btw herbert perry is awesome
February 9, 201016 yr QUOTE (The Baconator @ Feb 8, 2010 -> 11:59 PM) I add Ken Griffey, Jr. on that list. Given the number of injuries he's had in his career, I wouldn't be surprised if Junior used something to heal faster.
February 10, 201016 yr I pointed out the similarities between ARod's and Beckham's swings' awhile ago without knowledge of this article. But they miss the main point which is that both hitters put backspin on the ball. ARod is the best I have seen at this and Beckham is the only White Sox I can remember to do this. Gordon is especially good at putting backspin on pitches away, which allows the ball to carry more and gives him the opposite field gap power we've seen. A hitter who implements a swing with a slightly downward plane requires better timing because the pitch is always coming in on a downward plane as well
February 10, 201016 yr QUOTE (3E8 @ Feb 9, 2010 -> 08:22 PM) I pointed out the similarities between ARod's and Beckham's swings' awhile ago without knowledge of this article. But they miss the main point which is that both hitters put backspin on the ball. ARod is the best I have seen at this and Beckham is the only White Sox I can remember to do this. Gordon is especially good at putting backspin on pitches away, which allows the ball to carry more and gives him the opposite field gap power we've seen. A hitter who implements a swing with a slightly downward plane requires better timing because the pitch is always coming in on a downward plane as well
February 10, 201016 yr QUOTE (3E8 @ Feb 9, 2010 -> 08:22 PM) I pointed out the similarities between ARod's and Beckham's swings' awhile ago without knowledge of this article. But they miss the main point which is that both hitters put backspin on the ball. ARod is the best I have seen at this and Beckham is the only White Sox I can remember to do this. Gordon is especially good at putting backspin on pitches away, which allows the ball to carry more and gives him the opposite field gap power we've seen. A hitter who implements a swing with a slightly downward plane requires better timing because the pitch is always coming in on a downward plane as well Beckham's hands start lower now than they were in college. All MLB hitters swing on the same plane as the pitch. The better ones stay on that plane longer which allows them to square it more often.
February 10, 201016 yr Not all hitters swing on the plane as the pitch. A slight upswing at the same angle which the pitch is oppositely going down gives you a better chance at contact, which Ted Williams advocated so strongly in his book 'The Science of Hitting' (recommended btw). On outside pitches, Beckham has shown ability to take a slightly downward swing until point of contact then quickly roll his right wrist over, creating tremendous backspin on the ball. This video is a great example, clear to see around the 36 second mark. http://chicago.whitesox.mlb.com/media/vide...tent_id=6466723 The backspin is what causes the ball to carry and fool Ellsbury. Stone comments about the ball "slicing away" and "just taking off". The opposite effect occurs when you swing at an angle steeper than that which the ball is coming down at and put topspin on the ball, or a humpback line drive as Hawk would call it
February 10, 201016 yr QUOTE (3E8 @ Feb 9, 2010 -> 10:12 PM) Not all hitters swing on the plane as the pitch. A slight upswing at the same angle which the pitch is oppositely going down gives you a better chance at contact, which Ted Williams advocated so strongly in his book 'The Science of Hitting' (recommended btw). On outside pitches, Beckham has shown ability to take a slightly downward swing until point of contact then quickly roll his right wrist over, creating tremendous backspin on the ball. This video is a great example, clear to see around the 36 second mark. http://chicago.whitesox.mlb.com/media/vide...tent_id=6466723 The backspin is what causes the ball to carry and fool Ellsbury. Stone comments about the ball "slicing away" and "just taking off". The opposite effect occurs when you swing at an angle steeper than that which the ball is coming down at and put topspin on the ball, or a humpback line drive as Hawk would call it There are two approaches, rotational (current players) and linear (Williams and most from earlier eras). If you watch the MLB Network you can see the old approach is so obviously different from what we see today. There is a pronounced forward "linear"movement into the pitch. This is where the upswing would be utilized. Today the hitters stay stationary once that stride heel drops and "rotate" around an axis. This is where that downward-outward approach comes in. They must must track the plane and share it to make quality contact. The oppo hit that to me most represents Beckham's ability was the one that started his his acention,, the walk-off against the Cubs.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.