Totally. Would love to see that analysis too. But you figure if you’re trading good players always at the 2-years-left mark, you’re going to get back some amount more than 1. Trading 2 years for 12 or 18 years probably needs to be the way.
If you’re scouting we’ll, doesn’t that have to eventually lead to overflowing surplus?
And then since we actually aren’t the Rays…we can fill plenty of holes with money in ways they can’t.
But this rewarding our young prospects with $50M can’t happen. Gotta keep them hungry, gotta stay shrewd.
And why the hell don’t we just offer triple the salaries for smart exec guys? Money talks. Let’s poach