Big Daddy Kool Posted November 17, 2010 Share Posted November 17, 2010 Per SI's Jon Heyman: #whitesox talking to matsui. they want 2 lefty bats. that would be one. less than 5 seconds ago via web http://twitter.com/si_jonheyman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted November 17, 2010 Share Posted November 17, 2010 Matsui signing would probably mean Quentin would be moving on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxPride56 Posted November 17, 2010 Share Posted November 17, 2010 QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Nov 17, 2010 -> 12:25 PM) Matsui signing would probably mean Quentin would be moving on. Â I'm not following...how so? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted November 17, 2010 Share Posted November 17, 2010 QUOTE (SoxPride56 @ Nov 17, 2010 -> 01:27 PM) I'm not following...how so? Any near-full-time DH signing would push quentin back into RF, and that sounds like a bad plan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted November 17, 2010 Share Posted November 17, 2010 QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Nov 17, 2010 -> 06:25 PM) Matsui signing would probably mean Quentin would be moving on. Â Not following....Matsui would be the DH Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxPride56 Posted November 17, 2010 Share Posted November 17, 2010 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Nov 17, 2010 -> 12:28 PM) Any near-full-time DH signing would push quentin back into RF, and that sounds like a bad plan. Â Â I agree. Q needs to stay far away from RF! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DirtySox Posted November 17, 2010 Share Posted November 17, 2010 (edited) Brett Ballantini CSNChi_Beatnik Brett Ballantini Per KW unlikely to sign an offense-only player @ DH RT @SI_JonHeyman: #whitesox talking to matsui. they want 2 lefty bats. that would be one 1 minute ago Edited November 17, 2010 by DirtySox Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chisox2334 Posted November 17, 2010 Share Posted November 17, 2010 umm wheres pierre playing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justBLAZE Posted November 17, 2010 Share Posted November 17, 2010 Matsui CAN still play LF, which doesn't make him offense-only however if this rumor is true he will be a DH, no one wants Matsui patrolling the OF. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chisox2334 Posted November 17, 2010 Share Posted November 17, 2010 I dont know who that guy is on comcast but he has no insight lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chisox2334 Posted November 17, 2010 Share Posted November 17, 2010 I guess Adam Dunn is offense only player too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DirtySox Posted November 17, 2010 Share Posted November 17, 2010 QUOTE (chisox2334 @ Nov 17, 2010 -> 12:33 PM) I dont know who that guy is on comcast but he has no insight lol  Huh? He's a Sox beat guy. One of the few decent ones out there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted November 17, 2010 Share Posted November 17, 2010 QUOTE (SoxPride56 @ Nov 17, 2010 -> 10:27 AM) I'm not following...how so? Quentin can't possibly play in the field on a regular basis after seeing how much of a disaster he is there? And we also know Matsui can't. So if Matsui comes in, he'd be the DH, which means Q can't DH. Â But that is solely based upon the fact that I don't want Q to be an everyday outfielder. He can play every once in a while but not more than once or twice a week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxPride56 Posted November 17, 2010 Share Posted November 17, 2010 QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Nov 17, 2010 -> 12:34 PM) Quentin can't possibly play in the field on a regular basis after seeing how much of a disaster he is there? And we also know Matsui can't. So if Matsui comes in, he'd be the DH, which means Q can't DH. Â But that is solely based upon the fact that I don't want Q to be an everyday outfielder. He can play every once in a while but not more than once or twice a week. Â Â I agree with that 100%...I just hope the Sox see what we all see as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justBLAZE Posted November 17, 2010 Share Posted November 17, 2010 This in just after Kenny was quoted saying they are trying to figure out what to do and things might look the same (read no trades) after winter meetings. Â My point is, don't ever believe what the media are saying about Kenny and his job. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elrockinMT Posted November 17, 2010 Share Posted November 17, 2010 QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Nov 17, 2010 -> 06:25 PM) Matsui signing would probably mean Quentin would be moving on. Â Matsui would be the DH not RF'er Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxPride56 Posted November 17, 2010 Share Posted November 17, 2010 QUOTE (elrockinMT @ Nov 17, 2010 -> 12:42 PM) Matsui would be the DH not RF'er   His point was, Quentin sucks in RF...there is no way he can play there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elrockinMT Posted November 17, 2010 Share Posted November 17, 2010 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Nov 17, 2010 -> 06:28 PM) Any near-full-time DH signing would push quentin back into RF, and that sounds like a bad plan. Â Â It would be nice to have 9 gold glovers on defense but that ain't gonna happen. CQ is serviceable in RF and we need to stick with our talent. He can do it! Repeat the mantra Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elrockinMT Posted November 17, 2010 Share Posted November 17, 2010 (edited) QUOTE (SoxPride56 @ Nov 17, 2010 -> 06:43 PM) His point was, Quentin sucks in RF...there is no way he can play there. Â completely disagree as I have since posted Edited November 17, 2010 by elrockinMT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted November 17, 2010 Share Posted November 17, 2010 QUOTE (elrockinMT @ Nov 17, 2010 -> 01:44 PM) It would be nice to have 9 gold glovers on defense but that ain't gonna happen. CQ is serviceable in RF and we need to stick with our talent. He can do it! Repeat the mantra Really, last year, he flat out wasn't serviceable. If he'd hit .280 and 40 HR, he might have been serviceable, but that'd be because his offense was carrying it. He was just awful, and it likely contributed to his struggles at the plate as well (through injuries). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maggsmaggs Posted November 17, 2010 Share Posted November 17, 2010 Where do I barf? A guy who will turn 37 midway through the season just shouts disappoint regardless of his stats last year. There a better buy-low options out there that are younger and can play defense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted November 17, 2010 Share Posted November 17, 2010 QUOTE (elrockinMT @ Nov 17, 2010 -> 10:44 AM) It would be nice to have 9 gold glovers on defense but that ain't gonna happen. CQ is serviceable in RF and we need to stick with our talent. He can do it! Repeat the mantra If by serviceable, you mean the worse or 2nd worse right fielder in baseball, than you are correct. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elrockinMT Posted November 17, 2010 Share Posted November 17, 2010 You guys underestimate CQ's abilities as a fielder. He has a very good throwing arm and is improving in the field Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted November 17, 2010 Share Posted November 17, 2010 QUOTE (elrockinMT @ Nov 17, 2010 -> 11:22 AM) You guys underestimate CQ's abilities as a fielder. He has a very good throwing arm and is improving in the field I can live with Quentin in left field, but as of now we have Pierre there. Quentin has a strong arm but he's not very accurate with it and has absolutely zero range and gets even better reads/jumps on balls. He is an utter train-wreck in right field and that is coming from someone who always felt people were harsher on Dye than he deserved. Â Dye was bad out there, but he at least got good reads and made all the routine plays. The problem was he was old and had no range. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted November 17, 2010 Share Posted November 17, 2010 QUOTE (elrockinMT @ Nov 17, 2010 -> 02:22 PM) You guys underestimate CQ's abilities as a fielder. He has a very good throwing arm and is improving in the field I will grant you that some improvement could be possible with time...but the key issue for me is...I think that if you put him out there, he keeps getting hurt, and every time he hurts a leg or something his range gets worse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.