nrockway

There’s nothing political about it. Bud Light needed a gimmick because nobody drinks their s%*# beer anymore. They tried something provocative that would give them a ton of attention, positive and negative. Frankly this is the purpose of “social justice” in 2024. That period started I think when Kaepernick signed a deal with Nike and a bunch of sweatshop employees started making $80 “black lives matters” shirts for wealthy liberals to buy. But I digress. It’s very very different from having pride in where you’re from. It’s not immediately political just because it’s the south side of Chicago, though if Schriffen wants to make fun of lakeview YUPs, I’m here for it.

Well it’s no skin off my back if people don’t wanna watch the Sox, I just wouldn’t call it a boycott and judge other people for choosing to attend a game. I think “tinkers cuss” just entered my vocabulary and I’ll be using it at every opportunity, context appropriate it or not.

That’s true but a different scenario. Also seemingly not very effective, if the A’s end up staying in Oakland it will be because they’re incompetent and couldn’t secure funding for a park in Vegas. Also, A’s fans are boycotting because they like their team and want to keep watching it. I guess the White Sox fan would boycott because they don’t want to watch the team.

I wish people would stop saying this because it isn’t true. Sometimes we just enjoy attending a baseball game because it’s a fun activity and we don’t even think about Jerry Reinsdorf. Personally I wouldn’t let some bozo executives dictate my life and the things I enjoy, you’re not changing anything by “protesting” a bad team, the state is paying Reinsdork regardless. It’s kind of like the logic of boycotting businesses who support policies you don’t like. It doesn’t work and you’re only punishing yourself. I think our friend South Side Hit Men has good rationale to ”boycott” the team, signing a sex offender who might help us to win 50 games instead of 48. I’m pretty disgusted by that, but I don’t see the point in punishing myself. I like the White Sox regardless of who the owner or GM is, that’s probably not going to change.

I agree and it's the difference between pitching and throwing: having a brain. Some guys think too much and perform worse because they get in their own heads, I don't think that's the case with Kopech. I think he just doesn't know how to pitch and is unteachable. I was thinking the other day about how in pretty every sport, front offices fawn over cream of the crop athletes that jump 45 inches in the air or throw 100mph at 15. They're 'oozing with potential', only they'll never grasp the mental components of the game which is ostensibly just as important as the physical part, presuming you meet whatever baseline is necessary to be a pro athlete. Meanwhile, you have executives that think players won't last because they're "too smart". then again, look how well drafting a Berkeley guy has gone for the Sox.

He needed a new pitch. I thought Bannister and co were teaching everybody sweepers though.

You've just described every form of media and news outlet from the New York Times to Breitbart; though I think they've abandoned print for TikTok instead of Youtube.

what a bone-headed idea it was to wave Maldonado home. one out and the heart of the order is up, let's have the slowest guy in existence challenge Correa's arm.

holy s%*#, did anyone else catch that Soroka's favorite author is the guy that wrote The Art of Seduction? ie the date rapist's manifesto. I know he's not the best looking dude in the world but you'd think being an MLB player would be enough.

deez nuts

It's not that I'm hung up on it, it's that you guys keep writing back to me about the same thing so I'm just trying to respond in unique and novel ways. I'll do it one more time. It seems like you could just as easily say essentially what you wrote. "He's progressing at a faster rate than anticipated. This is good news but there's still a ways to go". I guess I am hung up on the percentages. It's dumb and it makes no sense. Worse than making no sense, it's misleading. So is he 80% healed from the injury and at whatever constitutes 90%, you resume normal activities and this is cited in medical literature? I think they're rushing this guy back is basically my point and using quasi-scientific language to mask the fact that they don't know what they're doing.

normal humans don't talk that way but I would hope my doctor uses objective criteria to measure how my treatment is progressing and not use meaningless and arbitrary shorthand analogies for the sake of 'communication'. There's a difference between "your cancer is 90% cured" and "your cancerous tumor has reduced in size by 90%". So I'll ask again, how does one determine the difference between "he's running at 80%" and "he's running at 90%" in order to make the assessment that Robert is ready to resume normal baseball activities? why is 90% the medically-sound cutoff point and not 93.6%? Yeah medicine isn't an exact science but it also isn't an exercise in writing marketing copy. And yes this is the non-MD manager relaying information to the media, but I think there's a pretty strong basis to question whether or not this team's medical staff isn't just practicing quackery.

I like this. Have some pride even if it's contrived. I like his South Side talk too, I get the impression that he thinks about a baseball team's civic identity, what it might mean to the local community, and I'd support efforts to market the Sox as a neighborhood team rather than as a national or international brand. It might have the effect of international marketing anyway, a South Side Chicago team is objectively cool and everybody should want to imitate it. We have a global identity. I went to China once and met a woman who was obsessed with Lil Durk and less notable Chicago rappers, the South Side exists even in the Eastern imagination. We don't need another documentary about the hat, we need local initiatives. We already had a shooterz night which is a step in a direction, but I'm probably not the guy to ask about marketing.

the Bulls actually have a terrible track record with injuries and rushing guys back. This is the guy who managed a department that called Luol Deng soft and a wimp for not playing through a botched spinal tap that put his life in danger. The Ball reference was clearly a joke considering he hasn't even been in the NBA for a decade, but it's not correct to say that the Bulls manage their players' health effectively. sure, but why not 86.5% or 93.6%? The arbitrariness of it makes it seem pseudo, it doesn't exactly inspire confidence that they know when the right time is, it's essentially just a vibe check. I wonder if they ask LuBob to run to first base then show him a pain chart and ask him to point to the frowny face that best captures his mood.

Any MDs here? Is there some actual way to quantify the difference between "running at 80%" and "running at 90%" or is it arbitrary bro-science that gets players injured and re-injured? Bulls just s%*#-canned their "Director of Performance Health", ostensibly for mismanaging Lonzo Ball's injury for the last decade, maybe the Sox should follow suit.

That seems like a good thing, right? That's a pretty good FIP that's also pretty close to his ERA which might suggest his ERA isn't an outlier (the point of FIP ostensibly, does the ERA make sense?). Even so, Fangraphs' FIP-derived WAR has Fedde at 33rd (and Crochet a spot below). Do we think Fedde will continue to strike out 10 batters per 9? Probably not but I bet his HR rate goes down too. Personally I prefer baseball-reference's WAR calculation for pitchers. It seems more based on what actually happens in a game than however some eggheads weight the relative importance of a strikeout to a groundout to a walk or whatever.

yeah I thought this guy would have a better understanding of baseball than "so Steve what pitch do you think he's gonna throw next?" the response is "well he throws a cutter or a slider so I'd guess one of those" or "he's just thrown 12 fastballs in a row, what do you think?" in fairness to him, he seems to be improving and the chemistry with Stone is certainly better than it was the first week. I think Schriffen should know more about baseball though and it doesn't seem to me that he's doing the prerequisite prep work to understand who players are and what their player profiles are, what teams they used to play for etc. You listen to another team's broadcast and they can tell you a bunch of information about nobody call-ups on other teams, I don't think you get that on Sox broadcasts, and even though I like dogs I don't really need a guy to tell me how much he likes dogs for 3 hours.

Curtis Mead is really rough defensively. Looks like a poor man's Julien.

so we're all in agreement that Fedde would be a shoo-in for the pitching triple crown if there wasn't the "wins" component of it, right?

I think the worst thing about the nationwide jingle is that every single time they're like "oh ha ha that wasn't great we'll do better next time"

Shewmake just needed to shave.

I like this trend that's starting to develop where I get up for a couple of minutes and I come back and the White Sox have scored a run. 2 runs at that. Bizarro Sox or Bizarro D Rays? Both? edit: definitely meant to post this in the game thread.

he got off to a very rough start but has been solid for a couple weeks. No runs given up in his last seven outings, all of his earned runs came before April 9; 3 very rough outings out of 11 total. Excited to see what he can do!

Vaughn going for routine flyballs has me sweating bullets

I love the randomness of baseball. This is how AB's numbers get back to "normal", weird fluky stuff.