46DidIt

So if I produced a photo showing an unknown mark on an unknown person’s skin I should be fine then

The fact you bring up unreported crime further shows the irrationality of your opinion. This case WAS reported to police and investigated by police Yet somehow you think it was a valid counterargument to say I don’t acknowledge unreported crime. That literally makes no sense. How can you not see that.

Also, 46 did it. And by it, I mean IT.

And let’s face it. We all know if I wanted to scour the history of Soxtalk, that I would find plenty of evidence that those taking this position of guilt no matter what had an extremely strong bias against Clevinger’s “type” before any accusations were ever leveled against him. Don’t even try to deny it because I don’t want to waste any more of my time with your horseshit position when we all know it is true

That’s my point. One can not to be acquitted, ie exonerated, in a case which never went to trial in first place. Therefore it is irrational to conclude he should be considered guilty due to lack of exoneration.

I’ll acknowledge that many crimes are unreported. Now what? My point is, that to claim some one may be presumed guilty, as your side of argument is doing, until they have been exonerated when that person hasn’t gone to trial and therefore can never be exonerated, is an irrational argument that can never be defeated on its own merit because it is a fallacy. Point of my claim that you beat your wife and cannot prove otherwise since we can presume that according to your own argument she may too intimidated to come forward is that you can not disprove my claim. you witnessed nothing so not sure why you even brought that up. Those photos showing a couple light marks on some unknown person’s skin means absolutely nothing. You can’t even reasonably demonstrate the origin or actual nature of those photos. It is possible he did in fact commit the abuse, and youre free to believe what you wish. But to act as if your conclusion is based on sound premises that should be accepted on the face of it is entirely absurd. Given that both police and mlb investigation found lacking evidence, to conclude that he is not necessarily guilty is actually the reasonable position. yet here you are arguing people should be banned for stating a reasonable position, which just further illustrates the irrationality of your position.

So there is no way for him to be exonerated, if true. Like I said an impossible standard that your side of argument demands in order to maintain position that he is guilty

Exoneration is an impossible standard for him to reach when prosecutors didn’t find ample evidence to even put him on trial. So by your logic any person accused can be presumed guilty. How do we know you haven’t beaten your wife and she is simply too dominated by you and the patriarchy to make an accusation? I’d have to assume that is the case since you can’t prove otherwise.

Exoneration is an impossible standard for him to reach when prosecutors didn’t find ample evidence to even put him on trial. So by your logic any person accused can be presumed guilty. How do we know you haven’t beaten your wife and she is simply too dominated by you and the patriarchy to make an accusation? I’d have to assume that is the case since you can’t prove otherwise.

I’m just going to assume every one here has beaten their wife since none of you have proven otherwise

How many brains do you have?

I love semantic quibbles they are so valuable. Thanks for the response

s%*# wrong thread

IMO the first 90 feet are the most important by far, so if that .437 OBP translates at all to major league level I could give two shits about seven homeruns

People forget the white flag trade wasn’t the only element of the white flag. They also traded Harold for a bag of balls

No

If I open up a s%*# sandwich cafe in Chicago, does that mean I’m a big market restauranteur

Is this a trick question?

If Sox have enough players producing in order to cover 2b/3b/SS, and three non-catcher bench spots at the same time in order to bump Rojas from the roster, I will be amazed. If any of our crappy set of Ofers go down, he could be playing everyday in RF at some point for all we know. It would basically be everything going right with unestablished players and everyone else remaining healthy to have no room for him

I think it’s Baldwin and Meidroth as SS until Montgomery is called up. Rojas was signed for his ability to cover multiple positions in IF and OF, not to cover SS

Is it just me or is Meidroth a strange looking fellow. My first thought when i saw him was Brian Peppers and I haven’t thought of that unfortunate sod for years

Meidroth played more at SS than 2b with red sox org not sure I would consider that a change of position

Yeah I had thought Vlad had best OF arm I had seen during my lifetime (Clemente before my time and Evans was an old man by my time) but I think I’d go with Ichiro. Bo had some doozies too

Considering Ichiro’s best season was his fourth and his second best OPS season came in his ninth, I would say we must have seen more than 2-3 years of his prime. Speaking of ninth season, he reached his 2000th career hit in that year. Pretty sure that had never been done before, 2000 hits in nine seasons. All while winning nine consecutive gold gloves. Come on now he’s obvious hall of famer I was living in Phoenix area back in 2001 and was completely hyped to see Ichiro. So I bought tickets to first M’s game at Scottsdale Stadium. Not to be disappointed, Ichiro unleashed the most incredible throw I have seen in my life. I swear to god he was standing directly in front of the OF wall in the RF corner foul territory and threw a line drive perfect strike to third base no bounce. The runner was already there but god damn that was easily most impressive throw I’ve ever seen. The second baseman in the outfield grass could have cut that throw off. That’s when I knew the hype was real

Hopefully a lot of fill in pbp duties