kapkomet

Oh my... JT... 10 point lead... Uh oh... PUT EM AWAY.

QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Jun 12, 2011 -> 09:17 PM) Quite ridiculous. NBA officiating is embarrassing. It's the only way to keep them in the game.

let's see... 31 free throws attempted vs 12 for the Mavs. Um, yea.

f*** Dallas is just STANDING there. No movement. JJ FOR THREE!

Like I said, here comes that 10-0 run. You know Miami will lead again in this game. It's what happens after that.

Well, 9 point lead. And you know Miami has a 10-11-12-0 run in there... so can Dallas hang on? End this s***. ONE QUARTER.

QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Jun 12, 2011 -> 08:55 PM) Finally the tech on wade That's only been coming for 5.5 games now. STFU and go sit. And yes, it does seem like Dallas is going to live and die by the jumper. They need to get inside looks to get the outside game to open up.

LMFAO... THAT was some funny s***. LBJ offensive foul.

QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Jun 12, 2011 -> 08:15 PM) LOL!!!! What a f***ing call on Terry there No s***. And Dirk is just f***ed up tonight.

They're going to foul out the big guys from Dallas.

QUOTE (Buehrle>Wood @ Jun 12, 2011 -> 08:00 PM) So going by the Amare rule, Lebron James will be suspended for leaving the bench area to get into an altercation. No, wait... You know that goes absolutely nowhere.

Yea, that. I mean, I can't say it exactly, but Foley just kinda needs to.

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jun 11, 2011 -> 07:10 PM) My point...that if cell phone transmissions were causing serious harm, then there should be geographic localization of that particular problem. Or economic localization, or age-based localization, etc. If Cell Phones were causing a ton of damage, then given that they've been around for a couple decades now, the trends should be pretty darn obvious. Yea, I got that, and I agree.

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jun 11, 2011 -> 07:07 PM) The answer is probably no, but I'm still hoping the point was understood. That I understood the point, or that the person writing the article understood?

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jun 11, 2011 -> 07:06 PM) Our good friend Mark Foley went on Fox News this week, Hannity's show, to suggest that Weiner should resign, but also defended the rights of adults to send sexually suggestive electronic messages to minors. Were's lost's nearly world famous smiley.

Yea, it didn't appear that they linked this to radio signals from cell phones or the like. I just am wondering if there really is any cause and effect here.

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jun 7, 2011 -> 08:25 AM) Think "Intensity". Energy falls off by distance from the source cubed. The idea is that now we suddenly have a whole lot more transmitters increasing the intensity and dotting around everywhere, thus everything gets exposed more. Of course, as I noted previously, that makes other predictions; like anything caused by the proliferation of these devices should be focused heavily around cities, esp. cities like NYC and San francisco. So is there more autism (not because of population, but maybe per capita) in these more dense signal areas?

QUOTE (Tex @ Jun 10, 2011 -> 06:54 AM) Google 6/10/11 the search term Perry for President shows about 123,000,000 results. I wish I had been tracking it from six months ago. I feel really bad for Kap. In about 18 months he's going to be telling us why Perry is superior to Obama. He will want to cut off his fingers as he types. I'll be thinking at least that gets him the hell out of Texas. A pile of dogs*** is superior to Obama, but Rick Perry is that pile of dogs***. 100% hold your nose pick.

f*** you, Miami. Go choke one more at home.

holy f***, that was huge from JeT.

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Jun 6, 2011 -> 09:35 PM) No. It's a meaningless distraction. But keep pretending its a legitimate point, it's funny. Everything's meaningless to you unless you've thought of it. You can't answer it.

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jun 6, 2011 -> 09:14 PM) Clearly babies aren't on the phones all the time but neither are bees. Anyway, I'm not trying to allege a cell phone autism link, please don't misunderstand me here. I'm saying that if cell phones were causing a medical issue...that's what it should look like, a rapidly, almost exponential increase in whatever condition we're talking about, with increases starting in the early 80's and growing from there, and I can't think of any sort of brain condition (Other than autism) that fits that pattern. But weren't these same radio frequencies and waves around in the 70s and now just used differently? Spectums and bandwidths have been there for a while.

Okay. Whatever. How about trying to actually answer the question instead of being the "WINNAH" at debate tactics?

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jun 6, 2011 -> 10:45 AM) Autism is one that comes to my mind because it's a brain-issue that has skyrocketed in occurrence the last few decades...and by all accounts it's not just better diagnosed now, it's actually happening a lot more. That's the type of pattern you ought to see with some set of brain tumors for cell phones to be a causal factor. Okay, but... babies aren't on the phones all the time, right? Or are you trying to say adult autism?

Answer the damn question. You can't. FOCUS on something for once instead of moving the goalposts.