QUOTE (illinilaw08 @ Jun 16, 2014 -> 02:40 PM)
To me, this is one of those arguments that's great in theory. The assumption here is that everyone who is carrying in that bar (1) is proficient with their firearms; and (2) are able to calmly ascertain the situation and take down the correct person(s).
I have never understood why there isn't a comprehensive exam required for firearm ownership (sort of like a driving test - mandated range time, instruction, etc. prior to obtaining the right to purchase a firearm) with mandated continuing education (on the range, firearm safety classes, whatever). As someone who doesn't own or use firearms, I would feel a lot safer around people who do carry if I had a reasonable expectation that they were competent with their weapon.
These ideas would seem to be common sense, yet shockingly not agreeable to all.