Jump to content

fathom

Members
  • Posts

    149,903
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    242

Everything posted by fathom

  1. QUOTE (flavum @ Jul 12, 2017 -> 01:18 AM) Anyone checking minor league lineups tonight? No AAA or A+
  2. QUOTE (Jose Abreu @ Jul 12, 2017 -> 01:16 AM) At the very least, McGuffey's original tweet has been confirmed (assuming that the "unconfirmed" part was people being wary of his credibility). I think Rabbit's recent tweet (If Jose pitches for the Sox again it's likely because of a sudden, significant impasse) is a concrete rumor WSD retweeted it so his initial tweet today was clearly something related to Q
  3. Also think Kahnle or Swarzak could easily be involved as Brewers need late inning help
  4. QUOTE (daggins @ Jul 12, 2017 -> 12:06 AM) I love Brinson, but if he's coming, then the secondary pieces will probably be underwhelming. FYI Woodruff is 43 in BA top 100
  5. QUOTE (iamshack @ Jul 12, 2017 -> 12:02 AM) How much do you like Brinson? I don't love him. Is Brinson AND Hader too much? I like Woodruff more than Hader. Haven't seen enough Brinson but I know scouts raved about him in ST
  6. QUOTE (iamshack @ Jul 12, 2017 -> 01:00 AM) That seems a bit sparse to me... Just going off idea of them getting top 30 bat while also being a package that might be disappointing. Something to keep in mind is the Brewers prospects have sucked this year for the most part (not Brinson)
  7. So if it's Brewers, package ideas? -Brinson seems like a must - Gatewood - Woodruff
  8. https://mobile.twitter.com/SSS_joshnelson/s...920135219326976
  9. QUOTE (Butter Parque @ Jul 12, 2017 -> 12:29 AM) I just don't see how a deal could get done with Colorado that would make us fans happy unless Rodgers was included. Who would be the headliner? Pint? Sorry, but that requires WAAAYYY too much projection to be the headliner for Q. Tapia? Like the player, but again, I don't see it as a headliner. Other than Rodgers, I don't see that main piece in their system. I like McMahon and would want him included in any trade, but he's not a headliner. Tapia, McMahon and Pint would be a good deal. With that said, I don't think Rockies trade for Q.
  10. QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Jul 12, 2017 -> 12:26 AM) No such thing. Sure thing to make the majors...not be a star, sorry should have clarified
  11. QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Jul 12, 2017 -> 12:24 AM) What's his name and who is he listing? https://mobile.twitter.com/CarasikS
  12. QUOTE (iamshack @ Jul 11, 2017 -> 11:22 PM) This is what concerns me about what Rabbit and others have said regarding us being disappointed... I suspect if Rodgers or some of these other headliners were involved, people would not necessarily be hugely disappointed. It makes me think we'll get more of a depth package. For the record, would hate a depth package for Q. Need at least one "sure thing"
  13. QUOTE (iamshack @ Jul 11, 2017 -> 11:22 PM) This is what concerns me about what Rabbit and others have said regarding us being disappointed... I suspect if Rodgers or some of these other headliners were involved, people would not necessarily be hugely disappointed. It makes me think we'll get more of a depth package. Agreed and the guy on twitter reporting the Braves interest isn't exactly listing big prospects as possibilities.
  14. I want Q on Brewers so we can root for him next 3.5 years
  15. Really prefer Albies isn't main piece. Seeing a few scouting reports lately that he's a bad hitter from the left side.
  16. Just throwing this out there, but wonder if Cubs could be in play with the possibility they trade one of their young stars. If they want to sell low on Russell as part of a package....yes please
  17. QUOTE (shakes @ Jul 11, 2017 -> 06:05 PM) Hahn is definitely a good negotiator. I trust he is getting good value on trades. It can be hard to be as patient as he is, and when you get a group of teams interested one the GM's will be less patient and give in. If Q goes first, the market will get real interesting. Not sure the effect it will have on Gray's value, but if it is a big enough return I would bet a couple of new names will hit the market that otherwise wouldn't have. What I have found telling is that Houston seems to be kicking the tires on some pitchers that don't seem to be available. That tells me that the Sox and A's have a high price tag and they figure if they are willing to meet that package they might as well see what else they could get for it. I don't think Astros believe Q is a good fit for their park
  18. I did think it would be quite funny if the Sox took Torres, Fowler and Kaprielian and let Herm work his magic
  19. QUOTE (shipps @ Jul 11, 2017 -> 06:03 PM) Hopefully its just the ridiculous trade scenarios that have been bandied about around here that are off the table and not the reasonable offers that we have discussed on here that contained an elite prospect or two. You mean no Torres and Frazier?
  20. QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Jul 11, 2017 -> 05:59 PM) I'm basing my opinion off what rabbit has said. To me, it's less about the Sox settling and more he's implying some of the names discussed on here are off the table.
  21. QUOTE (ChiliIrishHammock24 @ Jul 11, 2017 -> 05:53 PM) I can't imagine anything happens today with the all-star game. MLB wouldn't be happy to have it overshadowed. If anything happens, tomorrow would likely be the earliest, or I guess late tonight. Unless you're ARod
  22. QUOTE (shipps @ Jul 11, 2017 -> 06:47 PM) Would something big actually happen on the day of the AS game? Nope but could be announced tomorrow or Thursday. When WSD had the shields info, it took about a week to be completed
  23. Awesome game for Collins. Nice to see the slam came off a LHP and it was a belt high fastball
  24. QUOTE (Buehrle>Wood @ Jul 11, 2017 -> 04:14 AM) Wtf was that tease? Steph? DIXIE? Brothers first guess was gable is his son
  25. Getting MRI https://mobile.twitter.com/BrianBilek_/stat...533345085992960
×
×
  • Create New...