fathom

QUOTE(Punch and Judy Garland @ Oct 29, 2005 -> 02:10 AM) Yeah but who would Anderson take over for in the outfield. Obviously not in right or center and I don't think that Pods is your DH. Things will work themselves out. Anderson definitely won't be the DH though.

QUOTE(DBAH0 @ Oct 29, 2005 -> 02:02 AM) Oh yeah, that's what these boards about. You're not going to have 2500 people wholeheartedly agreeing saying "Ooooh yes, let's trade for this guy" "this guy should be re-signed for $$$$" etc. And that's what will make this off-season so interesting, and so tough for KW. There are a LOT of different scenarios that could play out here, and right now, it depends on what Mr. Konerko does. In the mean-time it's just fun to speculate what could happen in the future, although I always like doing that whether it's April, October or December. The best thing is that we're basically playing with house money right now. KW can take a chance. Don't be shocked if we don't try and make a big time trade this offseason. It would be intriguing if Ozzie tries to use his latin influence to get someone like the disgruntled Miguel Cabrera.

QUOTE(DBAH0 @ Oct 29, 2005 -> 01:46 AM) No doubt our offense is going to need upgrading if we lose Paulie. Unless we trade prospects, I don't know how we're going to do that without trading a starter, and people won't like Contreras being moved. BTW, just cause I disagree with your opinion earlier, doesn't mean I don't enjoy talking about potential transaction things. Unlike some others, you realize that there's no way this whole team will be back next season.

QUOTE(DBAH0 @ Oct 29, 2005 -> 01:27 AM) C'mon fathom, you've been mooting trading Contreras while his value is at an all time high. Look if the Sox could possibly find a replacement starter in the FA market, it's an avenue they could take a look at (but I'd doubt it). Does anyone think Garland's definitely going to win 18 games next season? A lot of people are worried that 2005 may have been a year out of blue for him, hence don't lock him up to a 3-4 year deal. All these are things KW's going to hav to think about. Easier to keep Garland for 3-4 years in what should be his peak years than it will be to resign Contreras after this season. Not only that, but who would replace Garland in the rotation? Sure the hell not Duque. Also, if you get rid of Garland, you might be paving the way for Buehrle to also leave in a few years w/o his best buddy.

QUOTE(Milkman delivers @ Oct 29, 2005 -> 01:18 AM) Which is what leads me to believe some random internet "source" made this garbage up and just used Carroll's name to make people think, "hey, this guy must be telling the truth." Of course, I'm already drunk and that could be the reason I think this way. It's 100 pct legit that he commented about it on the radio. Don't forget the blurb in the Sports Weekly. The main thing that sucks about this is that it takes away a LITTLE bit of what should be the ultimate enjoyment right now.

QUOTE(DBAH0 @ Oct 29, 2005 -> 01:10 AM) Most likely I think Paulie is going to leave, Dye moves to 1B and Anderson to RF (even though I think he'll be the everyday CF starting from 2007). The big bat the Sox want is going to come at the DH spot. So I don't think Thomas is going to be back, too much of a risk. You've got trade options. How about a Jon Garland for Chad Tracy type deal? Arizona would probably throw in a Cintron or a prospect or 2 as well possibly. Garland would be a good sinkerball pitcher at their park (Brandon Webb people), and Tracy gives us the big bat we need, yet he can also play 1B/3B/OF if needed. No offense, but if all that stuff happened, we'd get 3rd place in the AL Central next season. Our offense would be worse, as would our pitching.

QUOTE(Punch and Judy Garland @ Oct 29, 2005 -> 01:03 AM) Isn't it possible that the appeal was successful? Is it a given that the appeal failed? No, it's not a given, but it's almost impossible to appeal such a ruling successfully. I guarantee whoever it is will have a tremendous alibi.

QUOTE(Felix @ Oct 29, 2005 -> 12:37 AM) If someone leaked something though, wouldnt they have leaked the name along with the story? Wouldnt leaking the name be a bigger story than just leaking the fact that someone uses roids? I just read that the guy took a phone call during the appeals process to get his knowledge about the use of a certain performance enhancer.

QUOTE(Rowand44 @ Oct 29, 2005 -> 12:31 AM) Fathom, here's a question: If the agent of this player admitted his player got caught with roids how the f*** did this not leak, we don't even know what agent said this?? These things get leaked so easily and now this agent makes a statement and we got nothing? Seems kind of weird to me. I find it very hard to think that an agent let this leak, especially for a Sox player who would have still been playing. Do I think the rumor is accurate? Absolutely, or else Carroll looks like a f***ing liar about the appeals process.

QUOTE(Felix @ Oct 29, 2005 -> 12:27 AM) My problem is it, wouldnt we know about the player testing positive before the player appealed? Wouldnt they say something like "blah blah tested positive for steroids. its being appealed" At least, isnt that what happened with the Palmeiro situation, or am I off (quite possible)? I do find it hard to believe an agent would say something prior to the appeal. No matter who it is, Selig was going to wait a while to announce it. No way we're going to hear something until a few weeks after the WS if it's true.

If we're judging by players trying to recover after injuries, you never know if Pods might have done the juice to try and recover after his slow start back off the DL. Again, in no way am I saying this is a fact, but I highly, highly doubt that Vlad is the person we're talking about in relation to injury.

The main difference between this rumor and the Clemens/Damon rumor is that there's actually someone claiming they were part of the appeals process.

QUOTE(nitetrain8601 @ Oct 28, 2005 -> 10:29 PM) f***, why'd this have to happen?? I think that's the same thought anyone that has read this rumor had.

It's great that he said what he did, but please don't hold it against PK if he goes elsewhere.

QUOTE(DonkeyKongerko @ Oct 28, 2005 -> 09:37 PM) If it's Pods or Dye somehow, it will greatly taint our championship as they both had some pretty big hits in October. Rowand would be about the same but maybe to a slightly lesser degree. And that's why if it's one of those guys that are guilty, then their ass better not be back with the team next year.

QUOTE(Felix @ Oct 28, 2005 -> 08:46 PM) So its someone from Boston or New York. I dont think Chicago has anything to worry about. World Series Champion = newsworthy

Don't forget that the source said that we would care about this person, in terms of it being newsworthy and a big deal. Juan Rivera wouldn't be too big of a deal.

QUOTE(Punch and Judy Garland @ Oct 28, 2005 -> 07:06 PM) I remain skeptical about things said at parades. I recall Carmelo Anthony hinting he'd return to school after they want the Natl Championship. Don't put too much into something said at such an emotional and euphoric time. We'll have to pretty much offer a match to keep him but I think JR will probably do it. I don't think there will be a discount though Sean May told the UNC crowd that he was definitely coming back after they won it last season.

QUOTE(aboz56 @ Oct 28, 2005 -> 06:59 PM) Latest I heard was 6 years and 72 million, a Tejada type deal. 6 years? Yikes, that's a pretty long contract. Where did you hear this figure?

QUOTE(SSH2005 @ Oct 28, 2005 -> 06:43 PM) OMFG, Paulie just said they may have to do this again next year. Is he coming back? Ask UNC fans and Sean May about how seriously you should take things said in the celebration rally. Of course, it's better than him saying "Go f*** Yourself Chicago".

QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Oct 28, 2005 -> 05:25 PM) After this season...I don't think there's a chance in Hell of that. KW might be executed. I think Rowand's even going to get some of the speaking time today. Pods might be on that list too. If we hadn't won it all I could see one of them getting moved, but with a trophy...there's not a chance KW will break that part up. They're under contract, not FA's after 06, and they're cheap. Balta...refer to the other thread you were posting in today. It relates to how Flash Tizzle said that if a Sox player is the one who's getting busted, he doesn't think they'll be back next year.

QUOTE(Chisoxfn @ Oct 28, 2005 -> 05:21 PM) I would be shocked if either were dealt. Lets just pray that there's no reason the Sox feel like they have to trade one of them.

This is of course assuming that both Pods and Rowand are back next season.

QUOTE(Punch and Judy Garland @ Oct 28, 2005 -> 04:37 PM) Why would Will Carroll be involved with the appeals process? that was a bit lost on me According to another thread on this, he does a lot of consulting for MLB teams. I'm not sure in what aspect of the appeal he'd be involved, but he could be used as an expert on the topic.

Even though this team had great chemistry, a lot of times the worst thing a franchise can do is to bring back every single player from the championship team out of fear that losing a player would disrupt chemistry. Everett is the type of guy that feels he should always be a starter....and I'm pretty sure most of us on here don't want to see him be an everyday starter again.