Everything posted by Kalapse
-
Dye Trade Thread
QUOTE(Soxbadger @ Jul 31, 2007 -> 03:42 PM) Kalapse, I dont know I hope the Sox realize its better to put anyone out there under the age of 30 and just see what happens. The year is a lost cause. I hope that Erstad/Pods gets traded in another one of these we get nothing in return trades. Im just sick of seeing the same players go out there every day and not get the job done. This trade deadline was not going to make or break the Sox, and in fact Im glad none of our major players were traded *outside of Dye* because my guess is that Garland or Vaz would have been a package that would make most people throw up. I guess I just dont see what value Mack has on the bench. It seems negative to me, so thus addition by subtraction. The only player left under the age of 30 to recall is Sweeney and he's still blocked. I personally would have retained Mackowiak for next season, he's putting up a .350 OBP, .775 OPS and can play 4-5 positions well. Trading Mackowiak but retaining Gimpy and Grindy beyond July 31st only weakens the future of this ballclub.
-
Dye Trade Thread
There's still 2 roster spots being occupied by s***ty, old, injury prone players. The "kids" won't be called up until they're gone, which I doubt will be anytime soon. Mackowiak's departure clears the way for no one but Erstad.
-
Dye Trade Thread
QUOTE(Soxbadger @ Jul 31, 2007 -> 03:33 PM) No hes getting rid of old players so that new younger playsers can be auditioned. Thats called rebuilding. Would you rather have Mack and Iguchi play all year, or have younger guys who may be here in the future? If he could have traded Erstad and Pods for any value Im sure theyd be gone too. Mack had no place in the future of the organization, with the reality that rebuilding may take atleast next year. And if some how the Sox can be a contender next year, Mack was certainly not going to be a major piece of the puzzle. I see no loss in value for the Sox, so I dont see what the problem is. Who are these "young players" that will be taking Mackowiak's playing time? Erstad is about to be recalled and take the vacant roster spot.
-
Dye Trade Thread
QUOTE(CanOfCorn @ Jul 31, 2007 -> 03:34 PM) ...Who had fallen WAAAAAAY out of favor with the White Sox. Meh, so, he's 23 and in A ball...so what? This clears the way to see what the youngsters can do. Ryan Sweeney...come on down! You probably won't see Ryan Sweeney until September.
-
ESPN: Rob Mackowiak Traded to SD
QUOTE(elrockinMT @ Jul 31, 2007 -> 03:34 PM) We are stocking our minor league teams. But, only two class A players in return? Oh well! How much playing time would Mack get anyway this season with us starting a bunch of starving rookies? I would have to believe Sweeney gets called up to replace Mack, but we will wait and see obviously. It looks like Erstad will be taking his roster spot.
-
ESPN: Rob Mackowiak Traded to SD
Like I said, I hope the Padres decline his option and he can be brought back as as a free agent. He won't garner anywhere near the $3.25M his option was worth in free agency.
-
ESPN: Rob Mackowiak Traded to SD
The Mackowiak trade saves about $916K this year
-
ESPN: Rob Mackowiak Traded to SD
QUOTE(Buehrle>Wood @ Jul 31, 2007 -> 02:43 PM) Jon Link is his name. w00t a 23 year old in high A ball
-
ESPN: Rob Mackowiak Traded to SD
QUOTE(greasywheels121 @ Jul 31, 2007 -> 02:40 PM) Got a name? It could be a Fort Wayne Wizard--Amazing Baseball! Probably Shawn Estes.
-
ESPN: Rob Mackowiak Traded to SD
Offman just said it's a Class A pitcher. What the f*** is going on with this team?
-
Dye Trade Thread
QUOTE(Soxfest @ Jul 31, 2007 -> 02:21 PM) Boston is giving a good package for Gagne, hell I would trade Jenks for that. Scraps is all they want to give for Dye or KW is a total idiot! Kason Gabbard sucks.
-
ESPN: Rob Mackowiak Traded to SD
So I assume Mack will be their new starting 2B or at least a part of a platoon with the suddenly mediocre Marcus Giles.
-
ESPN: Rob Mackowiak Traded to SD
I'm going to go out on a limb and say it's for Nick Hundley, KW actually pulls off a deal that nets us a semi-talented player.
-
ESPN: Rob Mackowiak Traded to SD
This move opens up a spot on the roster for Darin Erstad!
-
ESPN: Rob Mackowiak Traded to SD
Hopefully the Pads will decline his '08 option and the Sox can bring him back via free agency, I love the way Mackowiak plays.
-
Dye Trade Thread
"There are also reports that the Red Sox are close to acquiring struggling White Sox slugger Jermaine Dye for Flamethrower Manny DelCarmen and outfielder Wily Mo Pena." I hate you Dan Davis you stupid f***.
-
Gagne to the SAWWWWWX
QUOTE(fathom @ Jul 31, 2007 -> 12:29 PM) They're 4 games back in the WC standings, and they've been playing great lately. They have just as good of a chance as anyone to win the WS this year. The Yankees will win the East.
-
Miscellaneous "MLB" Trade Notes
Yes, he'll get a whole lot of time at 1B and act as an insurance policy in case Alex Rodriguez opts out.
-
Dye Trade Thread
QUOTE(Steve9347 @ Jul 31, 2007 -> 12:29 PM) ESPN radio said that the deal is pretty much done... fwiw. Don't listen to that pudwhack Dan Davis, he's known for giving out false information during his updates. He's just going off the original Boston Globe report, he has no new information. I seriously hate that guy, he's terrible at his job.
-
Darin Erstad
QUOTE(NorthSideSox72 @ Jul 31, 2007 -> 11:53 AM) Back to what you posted earlier... why aren't the Sox trying Fields in LF? Has it been tried before in the minors and failed? Maybe they just want to get him as much time at 3B as possible, he needs to develop defensively at the position he will likely be spending the majority of his time playing for the rest of his career. At this point they don't even know if Crede will be back with the team next year, it would be kind of silly to take Fields away from his natural/future position to get him some time at another position that he may never even play. LF isn't exactly a tough position to play, if Crede shows up healthy to spring training then Fields can get his time in LF in Tuscon, there shouldn't be much of a learning curve with the switch.
-
Dye Trade Thread
QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Jul 31, 2007 -> 11:39 AM) I know he hasn't put up those numbers for a full season yet, but can you seriously complain about the job Owens has done for the last month, in a rookie campaign where he's still learning things and hasn't even mastered the bunt yet? I can't see him ever putting up anything higher than a .650 OPS, no this 93 AB stretch has not convinced me that he's a competent major league leadoff man. If the Sox expect to contend next season I really don't want to see Jerry Owens and his twig arms at the top of the lineup.
-
Dye Trade Thread
QUOTE(WHITESOXRANDY @ Jul 31, 2007 -> 11:31 AM) This is what I would do since there is no good offer for Dye even though he is hitting well again and appears to be healthier. And, no, Wily Mediocrity Pena and Mediocrity Delcarmen is not a good offer. Dye's willing to give the Sox a discount. Give him a 2 year deal with an option for a 3rd. 2 years for $ 15 mil. In 2008 play Dye in LF. Sign Rowand (who will also give the Sox a discount) and keep Sweeney/Anderson/Owens to play with them. That's an adequate, possibly very good, outfield at a reasonable price. They don't need to make any deals there. Since they are clearly not going to rebuild, keep the rotation except Contreras. Turn Contreras, Mackowiack and Crede into a young SS with potential and a veteran bullpen arm. That's it. The Sox should be able to contend because Jenks, Thornton, MacDougal, Logan and Aardsma should be better next year along with another veteran. Plus, the guys down in Charlotte will have more experience. Hold onto Haeger and let some other guys develop. This team would have an outside shot at a playoff spot. It doesn't sound real exciting but if Richar and Fields step up it could get exciting. Yeah none of that even seems plausible let alone likely. Apparently everyone is handing out discounts and a combination of old, expensive, meh and incredibly injured can bring you a young SS, that's news to me.
-
Dye Trade Thread
QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Jul 31, 2007 -> 11:26 AM) Our OF tomorrow would be Pods, Owens, Pena. WMP should not be put in CF, and is not even close to a threat to Owens if JO keeps hitting well. Ozzie is going to have his small speed guy at the beginning of the lineup. Everyone should accept that, and unless someone can find a better option on the FA market, which I certainly can't see, your choices are Pods, Erstad, and Owens. I sure hope, therefore, that Owens keeps hitting. Or he could get creative and find perhaps a more raw but talented leadoff talent on the trade market. f*** this, I'm not going to be satisfied with Owens, Podsednik or Erstad leading off for a contending team. I'm sick of hearing how there's no one available in free agency, this team needs a real leadoff hitter in order to compete and I don't even consider any of those 3 to be mediocre options let alone competent ones. If he has to he should overpay for some talent, this filling the leadoff spot on the cheap s*** is getting real old. I predicted this team to win 68 games this year largely because of the clusterf*** of ineptitude that this team was set to run out there in the 1 spot this year, I don't see this team winning many more games next year without a guy who can actually produce at the top of the lineup.
-
Darin Erstad
QUOTE(Capn12 @ Jul 31, 2007 -> 11:23 AM) So you are saying that grindErstad is more help to this team than Josh Fields, assuming both are healthy? Wow. Fields is only hitting .250, that's not very good. You need to look past more important numbers like his .744 OPS and concentrate on how often he hits singles like Gimpy.
-
Miscellaneous "MLB" Trade Notes
Well, this kind of sucks. Apparently the Yankees have agreed in principle to send Proctor to the Dodgers for Wilson Betemit. He's going to be a pretty damn good player, it's a shame it will have to happen in New York.