-
Posts
62,049 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
148
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by bmags
-
SEA swaps Carlos Santana for Edwin Encarnacion: 3 team trade, TB Involved
bmags replied to Sockin's topic in Pale Hose Talk
Man he's bad at breaking news. -
okay this pisses me off edit: whoa, sorry, I thought rangers traded off their rule 5 pick for a comp balance pick. THat was not the case!
-
Come on this is taking it too far. THey have option to just not take a player. They are instead taking advantage of position to get something out of it. They've had pretty good success with the minor league rule 5, but the major league one requires a spot they may not want to guarantee with all the youth coming up.
-
It's okay. Clearly with sox stash of players in AAA they don't want to be hamstrung with really a 24 man roster, so they are using their position for cash at this point.
-
SEA swaps Carlos Santana for Edwin Encarnacion: 3 team trade, TB Involved
bmags replied to Sockin's topic in Pale Hose Talk
he's been wrong before. -
SEA swaps Carlos Santana for Edwin Encarnacion: 3 team trade, TB Involved
bmags replied to Sockin's topic in Pale Hose Talk
Wow #actually Encarnacion to TB -
SEA swaps Carlos Santana for Edwin Encarnacion: 3 team trade, TB Involved
bmags replied to Sockin's topic in Pale Hose Talk
If that's the cost of a comp balance pick i hope we buy some, esp if we are to lose our 2nd rounders. -
SEA swaps Carlos Santana for Edwin Encarnacion: 3 team trade, TB Involved
bmags replied to Sockin's topic in Pale Hose Talk
I think they they think encarnacion is a better trade chip but...they just acquired him for a worse player just because he was slightly cheaper. -
I guarantee it's just this guy and maybe we get cash or some very very minor prospect. But i'd bet on just cash.
-
SEA swaps Carlos Santana for Edwin Encarnacion: 3 team trade, TB Involved
bmags replied to Sockin's topic in Pale Hose Talk
The Mariners are bad at this. -
SEA swaps Carlos Santana for Edwin Encarnacion: 3 team trade, TB Involved
bmags replied to Sockin's topic in Pale Hose Talk
I'm confused why a 3 way deal needed to happen here. -
It may very well be a matter of language, and I agree a real offer isn't sent over without prior discussions, it's just hard to know what the line that "not permitted to negotiate a contract" means, where is the line on that? Just not allowed to actually send initial one, or components at all are off limits?
-
Rosenthal: Could Harper be headed to the southside
bmags replied to Sleepy Harold's topic in Pale Hose Talk
Y'all, it's new thread time.
