Jump to content

RockRaines

Members
  • Posts

    43,333
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by RockRaines

  1. So he said the new story he heard today including the story about the bag has led him to drop the case. Wow.
  2. What a joke. Press conference to save your own ass.
  3. QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Sep 24, 2015 -> 07:10 PM) Scott Levin ‏@ScottLevinWGRZ 6m6 minutes ago Lawyers for #PatrickKane accuser are holding another press conference at 8;45 tonight regarding the alleged evidence bag. @WGRZ Here we go again. What else is there to say? What a circus.
  4. You are good, I couldnt find that s*** at all. Talk about muddy language. Its nothing like the NFL one where they basically can do whatever they want for a suspension at any time.
  5. This is all I can find, its hard to find the NHL personal conduct policy It looks like Bettman tried to invoke this against Voynov and it was repealed and the Kings actually got salary relief.
  6. QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Sep 24, 2015 -> 12:21 PM) I can't find the rule book now, but there is a specific clause that says he can be suspended without charges. And I'm sure the Blackhawks can sit him with pay. Your top point would be contested heavily by the players union. Bottom point is something they could do for sure.
  7. QUOTE (Jose Abreu @ Sep 24, 2015 -> 12:18 PM) The Hawks could simply not play him if they wanted. Thats true.
  8. QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Sep 24, 2015 -> 12:14 PM) Just to let the legal situation play out and avoid all the craziness and bad publicity going on. "Suspend" is the wrong word, I see nothing wrong with having him sit out for now while still getting paid. But once again, for what? He is not charged with any crime at the moment. There is literally no way they can suspend or sit a player forcefully without actual charges. In the NHL has this ever happened? I dont even pretend to think the NFL has any bearing on actual reality.
  9. QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Sep 24, 2015 -> 12:09 PM) At this stage I have a hard time taking a mans job from him. If/once charges are filed, sure suspend away. With as much fiction and mystery that surround the case, I would rather see some solid facts established before a suspension. I dont think its lawful to suspend anyone if they arent actually charged with a crime.
  10. QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Sep 24, 2015 -> 10:55 AM) That would be much easier to do if the NHL and/or the Hawks did the smart thing and suspend him for the time being. (with pay if necessary) For what exactly?
  11. This s*** is crazy. What is her attorney doing.
  12. QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Sep 24, 2015 -> 10:17 AM) Apparently never seen the ones that were tested to confirm that they were hers. Julie DiCaro ‏@JulieDiCaro 12m12 minutes ago Obviously, the accuser's camp would like to verify that the undergarments tested belonged to her, especially in light of yesterday's events Julie DiCaro ‏@JulieDiCaro 11m11 minutes ago I am NOT saying the underwear has disappeared, just that the accuser's attorneys have never seen it or been given access to it. She saw them when she gave them to the hospital/police. And why would her attorney have access to evidence after it was submitted? This makes zero sense
  13. QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Sep 24, 2015 -> 10:05 AM) I don't really trust any "source" in this case anymore, but here's a great piece of "news' to chew on Julie DiCaro ‏@JulieDiCaro 5m5 minutes ago SOURCE: Neither accuser or her attorneys in Patrick Kane investigation have ever seen the undergarments tested by crime lab. Wait, so shes never seen them ever or never seen them tested?
  14. QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Sep 24, 2015 -> 09:43 AM) It's a last resort, but you have to argue the facts that you have. And what makes you think this is going away? It's growing and getting weirder by the day. Because I saw yesterday as a last ditch effort for the lawyer to still look competent while admitting defeat.
  15. QUOTE (LDF @ Sep 24, 2015 -> 09:19 AM) excellent counter. but let me add this, for this discussion. if the envelope is needed when all the evidence within the envelope is put away?? it is only the envelope.... the mailing envelope. but as i said before, we the fans do not know the whole story and we do not know if this is real. I've had government drug tests that do need to follow chain of custody in theory and each time the actual sample as well as the bag containing the sample are both sealed and initialed by the tester at the hospital or test center. The bag that the attorney showed is not that type of container. IN fact my drug test for the FBI had their initials/signature as well as mine and they show you them sealing it in a bag.
  16. QUOTE (LDF @ Sep 24, 2015 -> 08:25 AM) so in a long and short, what is the msg. Another trick is to hit stop on the web page before it kicks off that stupid API
  17. QUOTE (Brian @ Sep 24, 2015 -> 03:55 AM) Vanessa was the most deserving but after Steve booted her, I was glad he won. And Vanessa coasted a bitter vote at the end. Glad she's off my tv. This season is definitely forgettable. It is forgettable for the game play during most of the season but the final three were deserving and the winner was as well. He played a great last quarter of the game.
  18. QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Sep 24, 2015 -> 07:48 AM) If only the Chicago newspapers were readable in online format. Easily readable from twitter because you are already logged into something I guess.
  19. Pretty decent article in the trib today from Kass http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columni...923-column.html
  20. QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Sep 23, 2015 -> 04:43 PM) You're missing the amazing opportunity to claim conspiracy and cover-up with a high profile, rich, influential accused. The DNA evidence is bad for them already. This provides a new angle for them to argue there would be more evidence (damning evidence proving rape) but for the tampering/cover-up. Claiming conspiracy as a last resort is borderline ambulance chasing. I sure hope that's not what they are trying to do. More and more this all looks like it's going to fade away.
  21. QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Sep 23, 2015 -> 03:45 PM) I would think they would just reseal the bag for this very reason: you don't want two evidence bags out there. End of the day, it's odd that the PD didn't say "yeah that's not our bag." If it is their bag, again, why the hell is it outside of the evidence room, separated from the evidence it should be containing? If i'm the accuser's attorney i'm loving this. The DNA evidence hurts you already, now you're throwing the whole test into question. Now it's a he said/she said case with this really odd conspiracy/cover up angle. Not sure why you would love it. Any possible physical evidence is now thrown out and a grand jury has to bring charges based on a he said/she said and circumstantial evidence. The odds of charges an/or a conviction significantly go down if physical evidence doesnt exist.
  22. QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Sep 23, 2015 -> 03:23 PM) Basically as of now I'm going to throw up my hands and ignore this story until something official happens because it's officially crossed the line to surreal. I don't see any other way to respond to what we've seen so far. Its literally like watching a crime TV show. Is it possible they put the kit in this bag, signed it, forgot to include something, opened it up and threw it away while sealing the evidence in another bag and sending it?
  23. QUOTE (Buehrle>Wood @ Sep 23, 2015 -> 03:07 PM) It would not take everyone to come in contact with it to cover it up, no. That said seems like might be a misunderstanding. I highly doubt the accused came up with this story That depends if you at some point violated the chain of custody and someone within the chain was in on it. The evidence goes from the hospital, to police, to lab, back to police and to central evidence. Somewhere along that line someone would have to break a seal that was signed by a nurse/doctor then somehow get them to reseal it with the exact same seal with their initials and then put back into the chain prior to analyzation by the third party lab. Thats if you were really trying to change or tamper with evidence.
  24. QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Sep 23, 2015 -> 03:04 PM) According to the lawyer for the accused, the bag had her name/DOB on it. So it's the evidence bag. It's just not the rape kit/evidence itself. The question is why the hell the bag isn't with the evidence secured in the evidence room. The police say it is. The question is who else could possibly either find a discarded bag, find a bag that was opened, or forged a bag with her name an DOB on it.
×
×
  • Create New...