Jump to content

RockRaines

Members
  • Posts

    43,333
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by RockRaines

  1. QUOTE (Marty34 @ May 27, 2009 -> 04:50 PM) Is Roy Oswalt better than Buehrle today? Will he be better than Buehrle over the remainder of his contract? If the answer is not yes to both questions, pass. So is he better than our Ace? Is that what we are looking for? I thought we were looking for someone who is better than our #4 and #5 guys. There arent alot of guys that will come pitch in our park that will be better than Buehrle. He may be a perennial CY contender in the NL.
  2. QUOTE (SoxFan1 @ May 27, 2009 -> 04:51 PM) Over(After)/Under(Before) on Beckham in the bigs playing for the White Sox is June 15... I'll take the under. I think next weekend is the ETA
  3. QUOTE (BearSox @ May 27, 2009 -> 04:34 PM) The question is... where will he play at Charlotte? Will he play 3B there, or SS? 3B for sure. You can bet on it.
  4. Beckham has been promoted to Charlotte FYI. If Fields goes on a slide, expect Becks in chicago soon.
  5. QUOTE (Marty34 @ May 27, 2009 -> 04:12 PM) He's 32. He's no more than a big name (with a big contract) at this point in his career. Fail.
  6. my comment on the game last night: Brilliant coaching for Orlando. From the up tempo style of play at the beginning designed to get Howard the ball down low 1v1 to the play calls at the end. f*** off cleveland.
  7. He may be up in chicago playing 3B by next week.
  8. At any rate, I really like the chatter going on in this thread.
  9. QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ May 27, 2009 -> 03:57 PM) I think over 90% of scouts would too. Beckham might have to move to 3B and if he does you now are comparing Alvarez and Beckham. Alvarez is better defensively and he has such massive offensive potential. That said, six months from now, people might be making fun of me for saying this cause Alvarez has been terrible in his short lived professional career. Not all scouts are right on about talent. I think in Beck's case, many of them really missed the boat.
  10. QUOTE (Balta1701 @ May 27, 2009 -> 03:56 PM) I'm not sure he can keep doing it...but if Richard can keep throwing anything like what he's done the last couple starts, I'm not sure I'd want to do that deal either. I personally thik Richard is about to hit his peak value. I still envision him as a guy who can get through the lineup twice, but not 3 times. If you can bring in a top of the rotation guy with him as a piece, you do it.
  11. QUOTE (Kenny Hates Prospects @ May 27, 2009 -> 03:52 PM) You guys are f***ing nuts if you think anything close to Poreda + Richard is going to get Haren here. I dont think anyone on this board thought that just Richard and Poreda would bring us Haren, just so you know.
  12. QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ May 27, 2009 -> 03:51 PM) Interesting quote from Rock's article: Money, money, money....if someone has money or willing to take on payroll, they could really get some great players. I think he meant: "If someone would please just take Eric Byrnes contract off our hands I will give you whatever you want."
  13. QUOTE (Jordan4life @ May 27, 2009 -> 02:23 PM) Pretty sure you're being sarcastic. But I'd take Alvarez in a second over Beckham. Dumbass Javy went Zack Greinke down the stretch that year and pretty much single-handedly eliminated any chance of us landing him. You'd take Alvarez in a second over Beckham? Really?
  14. http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20...rtnerId=rss_mlb This is just why I thought at least they would listen to our offer. 2 pitchers for the min vs Haren who is increasing in salary. It sounds to me like economically speaking, they arent doing very well. Of course it would have to be a compelling offer, but Haren to me is the perfect guy for KW to be agressive for. For the second tier, I would say someone like Garland, Penny, Bedard.
  15. QUOTE (Dick Allen @ May 27, 2009 -> 02:56 PM) So you post time and time again how Poreda is nothing but a bullpen arm, now you say he'd be very attractive to a team that needs an impact arm and would be willing to trade a very reasonably priced ace in order to get him. It doesn't make sense. My opinion doesnt matter to the GM's in baseball obviously as evidenced in the Peavy deal.
  16. QUOTE (Dick Allen @ May 27, 2009 -> 02:54 PM) The Padres have to trade Peavy or trim a lot of payroll elsewhere. The D-Backs don't have to trade Harden, and he's signed for a lot less money. I'd take either of them, but there is no way Poreda and Richard and a couple of lower level prospects get you Harden. I could trade my dog for Harden at this point. Now for Haren, I think a similar package gets it done to be honest. The Dbacks have to cut payroll eventually, and they will send off some vets pretty soon. Now if we could throw them two impact arms and possibly a young bat, it probably could get done.
  17. QUOTE (Dick Allen @ May 27, 2009 -> 02:50 PM) Haren will cost a lot more than Peavy, if he's even available. Well, I disagree. Peavy is younger though not by much, but is probably considered a better pitcher overall than Haren. The obvious downside is his contract and his no trade.
  18. The dbacks also (from what I remember) have nothing that looks like an impact arm in their system as of now. Poreda would immediately go to the top of the heap.
  19. QUOTE (Steve9347 @ May 27, 2009 -> 02:44 PM) Yeah, I've wanted Haren for awhile. If that happened, I'd be giddy. Look at the signs: Dbacks are Wayyyy out of it Sox deal with AZ consistently dbacks could use some young pitching for their already talented rotation He's already the 3rd highest paid player and starting next year willl be the 2nd highest paid then will be the highest paid. Garland is gone after this season. Webb only has ONE more year under contract then will need to be resigned or replaced. Sox have 2 starters to offer for now and at least 1 to contribute in a few seasons.
  20. If you want to know who KW is really targeting, I would take a look at Dan Haren in AZ. The Dbacks are 11 games back and they will sell off some of those guys. We are in a position to give them 2 sp's in Poreda and Richard and some minor league players for Haren if need be. He is a guy I would like to target. 2007: 3.07 ERA 1.21 WHIP 2008: 3.33 ERA 1.13 WHIP 2009: 2.57 ERA .90 WHIP Salary: 2009: 7.5 2010:8.25 2011:12.75 2012:12.75 2013: 15.5 team option or 3.5 million buyout Thats not a bad commitment.
  21. QUOTE (SoxAce @ May 27, 2009 -> 01:30 PM) ^^^^^^^^^^^ I love me some Matt Cain. Wave goodbye to Gordon Beckham
  22. QUOTE (IlliniKrush @ May 27, 2009 -> 01:03 PM) Yes, I absolutely do think he should. But, I think he will end up with another season. Let's not be blind to other issues (some mentioned already) just because the team made it this far. Problem is, he's already set up a huge mess, and I don't trust him to get out of it. Rocky's comments weren't very encouraging (putting it mildly) as well, fwiw. I always thought they hired Bowman with the intention of putting him in a role like this, but I think Dale bought himself another season with this premature run. It would almost be bad PR to can him at this point.
  23. QUOTE (chw42 @ May 27, 2009 -> 11:48 AM) They can't have Beckham, you can't trade him yet. The last thing SF needs are starting pitchers, which is what the Sox are willing to trade right now. I don't think they would take a Chris Getz and I honestly don't think Ramirez is a good idea to trade. If they really want a middle infielder, I honestly don't see it happening. Now if they want Jermaine Dye and another prospect, that's manageable. But I can't think what this offense would be like without JD and Quentin. You can trade him just fine, make him a PTBL and its done. This is who they would ask for, we wouldnt do it. Deal over. Its not worth even debating.
  24. http://deadspin.com/5270503/carlos-marmol-...ne=true&s=x Whoops!!
  25. I hate to say this, but Clayton Richard is better than he is. He wouldnt accept a minor league assignment, so unless he is in our rotation, he's not coming here.
×
×
  • Create New...