Steff

I doubt I'll ever bowl a 300... but before 2 weeks ago my best game was a 183. I bowled a 558 series - 177, 189, 192 and I was estatic. My strike record is 6 in a row. Congrats on the 300!

Two wrongs don't make a right. War sucks.

Just puppy shopping and IM Lingo cartoon making.

That was pretty clever. Awfully time consuming.

Do you still have any...?? Please, please, please say yes......

Wow.. Thanks PHF!!

If you wouldn't mind.. that would be great. Are you selling them? I've been looking for a few weeks and they are between $400 and $700. Far from the $50 I paid for our current dog...

Anyone know a reputable breeder that I can get a recommendation from or somewhere I can get a boxer pup for under $400..? Also.. are they good with kids?

OK.

OK. Just wondering why his "what if..." was considered a false rumor.

I do not feel the least bit bad for Joe. 21 SO in 50 AB's... :puke

How was that a false rumor..?

He said Ricky Henderson, not Tim Raines.

So do I. The forensics stuff is addicting.

Therapy.. and lots of it are in his future. Hopefully he doesn't turn out like Laturno's (sp?) victim did...

That was necessary...?? How about you go the f*** back to the Red Sox board.. or where ever else you might post..? See.. not nice. What the hell is going on here..? There can't be one disagreement of opinions lately that people aren't biting others heads off. Good grief folks.. relax a bit.

Nice post Steve.. and I totaly agree regarding the points made. But I stand by my belief that his comments were ignorant. How can someone who hasn't walked a mile in the shoes of someone in this situation possibly have any clue as to the circumstances behind it. To blame the parents.. that's like blaming a rape victim for being raped, or a shooting victim for being shot. I'll be the first to admit I have no idea what any of the parties are dealing with.. but I certiantly wouldn't lay the blame on the parents of the young boy. IMO that is just plain stupid.

LOL Jugger.. we've knows this for a few weeks now.

-JUROR #7 - A woman in her 50's, works at Pacific Gas & Electric and said she was a moderate follower of the Peterson case. She did not have enough information to decide, she said, adding that the media focused on Peterson as if he was guilty. Unlike other jurors who have stared directly at the judge or lawyer during the talking, she glanced at Peterson several times. Once, she fixed her gaze on the man accused of killing his wife Laci, and the couple's unborn son before answering that she could hand down a death sentence. But stated, "I don't see a motive," she said. "I haven't seen anything about motive." The Asian woman has indicated that she is a "crusader" and would not be swayed from her opinions.

Juror #7, an Oriental lady that was vocal about voting guilty, has been replaced by a juror nicknamed "Strawberry Shortcake". It's been rumored that she has made "eyes" at the defense.. whatever the hell that means.

I agree.

The Peterson's are in court and reports are that the Rocha's (Laci's family) presence has been requested. Does anyone know if they would be required to be there if the judge was just replacing a juror..? If not.. then this might mean an announcement of a mis-trial or a verdict.

G-D it!! Effin thread jackers!!

Does anyone know if they monitor or restrict internet access for criminals of this nature..?