Everything posted by FlaSoxxJim
-
Southside is better than the Northside
K!
-
Southside is better than the Northside
Dusty won't think about lifting him until he hits 120 unless he really implodes.
-
Southside is better than the Northside
Time for Loaiza to shine.
-
Southside is better than the Northside
OK, we get 2 anyway! Gload has a great 10-pitch at bat and makes them pay!
-
Southside is better than the Northside
Dammit!
-
Southside is better than the Northside
f***!! calling it a foul!?!
-
Southside is better than the Northside
Yeah!!!! SLAM!!!
-
Southside is better than the Northside
Take the walk if he gives it to you Ross.
-
Southside is better than the Northside
Do it Gload!
-
Southside is better than the Northside
2 down. Damn. C'mon Paulie!
-
Southside is better than the Northside
Out, according to the last pre-game report. They said in earlier.
-
Southside is better than the Northside
Be a Cub Killer here Jose!!
-
Southside is better than the Northside
Beauty!! E on Lee.
-
Southside is better than the Northside
Zambrano with no control early on again - way Timo!!
-
Southside is better than the Northside
Kick where ass?
-
I saw Frank Thomas
Not a bad profit margin there, Cdub. How about a finder's fee?
-
Southside is better than the Northside
That's the Twins in the Humpdome.
-
To whom it matters:
I thought it was a swamp planet...? Naboo has jungles. Hmmm. Hey, Jar Jar is that you trying to pass yourself of as Yoda?!? [/geek]
-
I saw Frank Thomas
Well, I know a guy who owns a pair of Chris Snopek's pants!
-
Marlon Brando
Then Mr. Allen is quite the newshound, he beat AP to the punch! Thanks.
-
Marlon Brando
I'm thinking so. Nothing on AP or any of the other wire services, although I see Ja Rule got busted for pot yesterday... Link please.
-
Bad News In Regards to the Server Switch
That bites, sorry to hear you guys were at it that long with no joy. Thanks from all of us for putting the time and effort into this place. Don't you just wanna pull the plug sometimes? (NOT that i'm suggesting that, mind you...)
-
Did anyone see F 9-11 yet..?
Saw the film last night. I thought Columbine was pretty good. I thought Roger and Me was very good. F9/11 leaves everything else he has done (film, television, books) in the dust. It is a great film, really really powerful. And it is absolutely sensitive and tasteful in the was it portrays the events of September 11 (for those suggesting Moore is profiting off the death of innocents, he pretty effectively puts things in perspective re Carlyle Group, Haliburton, United Defense et al.). You never see the Towers on 9-11, the people jumping out of windows, the thousands of deaths that were so sensationalized by every media outlet to the point of dehumanization. You hear the impacts while the screen is dark, then you see the horror of the events in the reactions of the witnesses as they unfold. That's the way the whole film is. The people in it tell the story, not Moore. And I didn't really grasp it until I saw it, but the quips about bias and lack of balance are bunk. Not because there is not a particularly Moore-ist anti-Bush/anti-corporate slant, because there most certainly is. The point is that the film does NOT exist in a vaccuum, and the events depicted did not occur in a vaccuum. You cannot help but take in Moores portrayal and be constantly processing them against everything you have already internalized from other media outlets. The film can't reasonably be taken to task for lack of balance because, in fact, it IS THE BALANCE - against the Bizzaro fabricated versions of events we have been fed and continue to be fed. We all have the party line version of things ingrained in us. Moore gives you the pieces that have been carefully, systematically, and insidiously omitted. And you are left to wonder WHY there is so much stuff here you NEVER SAW BEFORE. We all saw the post 2000 election coverage for 2 months, and I know I saw more of it than most. But I never saw any detailed coverage of the outrage and protest of inauguration day in DC as seen in the first few minutes of teh film, because the networks decided not to show that. Ditto for the widespread disillusionment of the troops as they realize they have been placed in harm's way and assked to kill and die as part of an idealogue agenda. Ditto for the portrayal of the Iraqi citizenry as (*gasp*) feeling, caring, (dying) human beings. There is no point in debating the merits of the film until everyone has seen it. To this point I have only argued in favor of the right for Moore to make the film but had no ability to discuss the film itself. I thought it would be pretty good, but thought it would fall short of the hype surrounding it (as Columbine did for me). It is so much more and so much better than what I had anticipated. "Do Something" michaelmoore.com
-
Dear Minnesota
Yes indeed, and we have had an awful problem not getting up for teh games against the bottomfeeders like we do for the ones against the contenders. We'd have won the division if not for our craptacular play against the Tigers last year. We SHOULD make hay against them this year and will all our games against them coming in the second half we SHOULD run away with the division on that alone. Sox just have to play them all like they matter because, well, they matter.
-
Did anyone see F 9-11 yet..?
I think "exaggerating the truth" qualifies as an oxymoron, but I get your meaning. Little fear of corrupting the weak-minded at any rate, since most of the Bushies are not going to see the film anyway. As far as making money off the innocent dead, you have to be kidding? The Holocaust or Pearl Harbor or 9-11 any human atrocity shouldn't be the subject of a documentary film because someone may make money off of it?