Everything posted by Capn12
-
Kansas City Royals vs Chicago White Sox 3:10 PM
Bullpen is allergic to being aggressive.
-
Kansas City Royals vs Chicago White Sox 3:10 PM
Do we have ANYBODY in the bullpen, not afraid of throwing strikes?
-
Kansas City Royals vs Chicago White Sox 3:10 PM
Ummmm....no, he didnt swing at that actually...
-
Kansas City Royals vs Chicago White Sox 3:10 PM
Our "dreaded" leadoff walks aren't quite as dangerous as anyone we play.
-
Kansas City Royals vs Chicago White Sox 3:10 PM
They could have been called balls, but knowing they are being called strikes, you HAVE to protect against it on that last pitch, not stand there.
-
Kansas City Royals vs Chicago White Sox 3:10 PM
Avisail looking oh so good at the plate.
-
Kansas City Royals vs Chicago White Sox 3:10 PM
QUOTE (fathom @ Apr 4, 2014 -> 05:58 PM) Talk about leaving a pitcher in for way too long. Oh well, just a terrible start by Johnson today. With his next start in Colorado, he better be a lot sharper. There is actually someone in this bullpen you trust, to not walk another 37 guys?
-
Kansas City Royals vs Chicago White Sox 3:10 PM
Yeah, keep walking people, dips***s.
-
Kansas City Royals vs Chicago White Sox 3:10 PM
Boy, this pitching staff, minus Sale and Q, is not going to be enjoyable to watch...
-
Sox vs Twins April 3 game thread
159 games of the Adam Dunn Experiment left...matter of fact, that will make a good sig...
-
Sox vs Twins April 3 game thread
5 innings at best now from Q. So yeah...about that long reliever...
-
Sox vs Twins April 3 game thread
Um...the worst effort there ever...and hooray, 3 runs. Thanks defense.
-
Sox vs Twins April 3 game thread
He was pounding the strike zone pre-run down fubar. Now, dibble dabble all over the place.
-
Sox vs Twins April 3 game thread
Damn if Q doesn't get rattled far too easily...
-
Sox vs Twins April 3 game thread
QUOTE (Jose Abreu @ Apr 3, 2014 -> 02:51 PM) In 2.2 games, Eaton has 2 dives into 1st. Grinder-Esque
-
Sox vs Twins April 3 game thread
Counting down the days, until Dunn is Done.
-
Sox vs Twins April 3 game thread
20 pitches in the first inning isn't going to help matters here, QUintana...
-
Sox vs Twins April 2 game thread
What value does a lefty, who can't throw strikes OR get any lefties out, have?
-
Sox vs Twins April 2 game thread
This bullpen is going to drive people CRAZY this year...throw damn strikes, man...its a lefty-lefty, do your damn job.
-
Podsednik
And here I was, safe in my own thinking, that I'd NEVER have to see that name ever mentioned on Soxtalk, again...
-
Kershaw Signs Record Contract
Makes Chris Sale look like he is making a few pennies a year. That's ok, I'll take that Chris Sale contract ANYDAY.
-
Official 2013-2014 NCAA Football Thread
Goodness....lucky ole us, I guess. I thought I only had to hear that BS from Clemson fans.
-
2013-2014 NFL Thread
As a Packers fan, I can say a huge thanks to locking up Cutler for 7 years. Appreciate it!
-
Official 2013-2014 NCAA Football Thread
Shaw being Shaw yesterday. I love it. I only wish that we hadn't burned his freshman season, all because Stephen Garcia was a douchenozzle at times. I knew Wiscy was going to be able to run at will, but that was only the case between the 20s. I also love how Tanner McEvoy got so pissy at South Carolina, and transferred to Wiscy, because he was told he'd never see the field as a QB. So he transfers, and....plays defense. Idiot.
-
Official 2013-2014 NCAA Football Thread
QUOTE (danman31 @ Dec 8, 2013 -> 09:47 PM) Clemson gets an at-large berth in a BCS bowl? Glad that system is gone. I had that discussion with my coworkers last Thursday, who are all Clemson fans here in Upstate S.C. I couldn't seem to get the point across that, you've accomplished nothing that is deserving of a BCS bowl, other than be the lucky recipient of a spot due to archaic BCS/conference limit rules. Welcome to the downside of the SEC, Mizzou. We(South Carolina) have been in the Top 10 of the BCS standings the last 3 years, beat the eventual SEC East champion all 3 years, and have zero BCS appearances to show for it. I'll never understand why such a system was 'trustworthy' enough to pinpoint the Top 2 teams for the BCSNC, but not used at all for Teams 3-10 for the other BCS bowls. Oh wait, I do understand...it was always about spreading the money to conferences, not about who deserved to be there.