Dick Allen

QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ May 3, 2014 -> 03:08 PM) Nobody is expecting or advocating that they be "cheap" with their #1 pick. People are just saying that it would asinine to spend close to the entire draft pool on it. It's not going to happen so we can argue all day. If Rodon is on the board at #3 and his representation wants 1:1 money, they will not pick him. Then he will go back to school. It is almost impossible to pay him $8 million unless you are the Astros or Marlins. I think there is a lot of smoke being blown up a lot of asses. I don't think he will still be there, but if he is, I think it is a near lock the Sox take him, as long as he is healthy.

I am watching Fox 1 sports . Isn't that where Frank Thomas was hired as an analyst? Right now Royce Clayton is the analyst. Weren't there rumors about Frank, Royce and some woman when the Choice played in Chicago?

The Cubs drafted a Boras advised guy with pick #2 last year. They signed 19 of their first 20 picks. The guys fro rounds 30 and higher remained unsigned and in the 20s they signed about half.

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ May 3, 2014 -> 12:11 PM) David Holmberg was traded for Edwin Jackson. Edwin Jackson was turned into Jason Frasor and Zach Stewart. Jason Frasor was turned into Daniel Webb and Miles Jaye. First off they probably could have still made the Jackson deal without Holmberg. Would you rather have just Trout or Webb and Jaye, a year and a half of Jackson and Holmberg pitching in your low minors and the great Jared Mitchell? I would take the best player. In this situation ot is Mike Trout. Apparently you like the other guys better.

Trying to save a few bucks hasn't worked for this team in the past and it most likely won't if they try cheap with their first pick. Just take the best player.

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ May 3, 2014 -> 11:24 AM) Even before there was caps a team could have spent their entire budget to get the guy they wanted, and left the rest go. No one ever has. If you look at the 2009 draft, if the White Sox sat out the entire draft with what they took it wouldn't have hurt the organization at all. Or if they spent the extra $50k it took to sign Trout and passed every other pick they would be in a much better place right now. There are always players available to fill minor league rosters. Guys who might develop into 4th OFs are fine but they are readily available every year for a song. The object at #3 should be to get the guy that will help you win the most games not save money for guys like Walker and Barnum and May and Thompson.

QUOTE (fathom @ May 2, 2014 -> 08:04 PM) Davidson just can't string together good games. 0-3, 2K His K rate is almost 40%. In AAA. Adam Dunn hasn't even approached that level with the White Sox.

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ May 2, 2014 -> 08:49 PM) It is ignorant of history to think that you can just give away your draft. Even the great Ditka failed there. Now you are comparing the NFL draft with the MLB draft? The last 14 drafts, the Sox have drafted and signed 4 players total with a higher career WAR than Ryan Sweeney. Just think about that for a minute.

QUOTE (fathom @ May 2, 2014 -> 07:39 PM) Eaton leaves the game. You have to DL him and let him get his leg right again. What a nightmare the health situation has been. It looks like Eaton will be a good player. The only question to me is can he stay healthy?

dp and Eaton pulls up lame.

Johnson looking like a member of the 2013 White Sox.

It is great to think your 2nd-10th round picks will be good players, but the reality is of all the players the White Sox have drafted this century, 3 have career WARs over 6.2. Sale, Gio, and Chris Young. The guy with the 6.2 is Ryan Sweeney.

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ May 2, 2014 -> 03:31 PM) Using a restrictive model isn't accurate. Those horrible draft picks brought Jake Peavy here, who in turn brought Avi Garcia here. Throw out guys like Clayton Richards, that deal doesn't get done, which means Garcia is never a White Sox. A non-first round Sox draft pick brought John Danks here. A Sox non-first round pick brought Conor Gillaspie here. A non-first round Sox pick brought Adam Eaton here.... etc, etc. It is pretty impossible to trade guys you didn't bring into the organization. So no names. As far as I can tell the Sox will still field minor league teams and you don't have to trade for Peavy if you already drafted an ace.

QUOTE (fathom @ May 2, 2014 -> 03:22 PM) Webb shouldn't be on the list. You are correct.

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ May 2, 2014 -> 03:23 PM) If you are going to look at it that way, you have to look at all White Sox draft picks on major league rosters, or non-first round picks of other teams who are on the White Sox roster. Tell me who is on another roster that is star. I liked Addison Reed, but a lot of people where really happy when he was shipped out for a poor man's Josh Fields. The White Sox have drafted like crap for years, yet they still can get other teams draft picks on their roster. So I don't see why that would matter.

The White Sox have 5 of their own draft picks on their roster not including Sale: Jordan Danks Gordon Beckham Marcus Semien Jake Petricka Not exactly hard to replace.

QUOTE (Eminor3rd @ May 2, 2014 -> 03:07 PM) It seems to me that many here are forgetting that Boras' ultimate goal is to make the most money for his client -- it is NOT to create ultimate chaos. Boras is not a villain who is trying to trick teams into failure. He's just trying to maximize the dollars. It also seems like many forget that the player has ultimate decision. Boras will attempt to convince the player one way or the other, but there are plenty of guys who won't turn down $6m for the shot at $8m or whatever. The player is the one that assumes the risk. If Rodon goes three and decides not to sign for a penny less than #1 slot value, he took some bad advice. Boras is smart man who gets what he wants most of the time. If he jerked teams around, gave bad advice, and exploited clients, he wouldn't keep getting new business. First off, Boras cannot directly negotiate with the White Sox or whichever team makes the selection or Mr. Rodon doesn't have the option of returning to pitch in college. Playing hardball has worked for some and screwed others. I was reading where Houston offered Appel $6 million the year before, and he said no. The Pirates drafted him and offered him $3.8 which of course was turned down. He ultimately signs with Houston the next year for $6.35 million. So losing a year of pro ball, he did gain $350k, but is probably a year behind in development, if not more. It could cost him an extra year to arbitration which make the risk of return pretty stupid. I think if JR and Hahn talk to this kid and his parents, or any team for that matter, they can show that being picked in the top 3 and not signing really makes little sense. The risk far outweighs the reward.

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ May 2, 2014 -> 02:52 PM) I count three big "if's" there. The entire draft is an if. You draft the best player. You defended the White Sox drafting Walker and his horribleness by pointing out only one of the supplemental picks his year made the majors. Why are you going to go cheap on pick #3 to have more money for a longshot? I also don't think if Rodon goes #3 he will not sign for a reasonable amount. It might be overslot, but I doubt he goes back to NCS if he's offered something reasonable. Maybe he isn't the guy the Sox think is the best. But drafting at #3 and picking based on saving a lot of money for later rounds isn't really too much different from the philosophy which got their system in this mess.

Dunn is one slump, something that is guaranteed to happen at some point, from being the most useless human being in Chicago. He won't be back. Even if he has a great year, I'm sure he's just as sick of Sox fans as Sox fans are sick of him.

If the Sox signed Rodon, and failed to sign everyone else they drafted, and Rodon was David Price like, the only draft they would have had up until this point of this century which would be as good or better is 2010 when Sale fell into their laps. Take the best player available at #3. Don't worry about saving money for your other picks.

Kepp is an every other year guy. He should do OK this year.

Last year, a lot of posters wanted the Sox to tank to get the #1 pick. That pick at the time was Rondon. If somehow an uninjured Rondon is available at #3 and the Sox draft someone else so they have a few extra dollars to sign someone not so highly thought of, to me would be the biggest waste of draft position. Do you pass on Chris Sale so you can get Gavin Floyd and Jared Mitchell?

QUOTE (almagest @ May 1, 2014 -> 03:18 PM) If the Bulls could do this and get the Lakers lottery pick this year I'd do it in a second, and I like Thibodeau a lot. I don't think Carmelo will end up here, just like any other top player ever. Forman and Thibs aren't exactly buddies. It wouldn't shock me if they would do this, but it kind of would shock me if the Lakers did this. They need players.

How much can Boras be involved with Rodon's negotiation and not kill Rodon's eligibility to pitch NCAA baseball ever again? I understand "advisor". Does that mean he can be his agent for "free" and just negotiate out of the kindness of his heart with the "hope" once said contract is signed Rodon makes him his agent? Or is it some sort of contingency where if he doesn't sign Boras doesn't get paid, but if he does Boras collects because at that point eligibility isn't an issue? I know some players have been busted for this. Personally, I don't find anything wrong with hiring an agent and if you don't sign, retaining eligibility, but obviously there are rules, and where the line is drawn on those rules, I have no idea. Edit: Looks like Boras wouldn't have any direct contact with the team that drafted Rodon: It is permissible for you to have an advisor but not an agent) without jeopardizing your eligibility at an NCAA school. Under NCAA regulations, you and your parents are permitted to receive advice form a lawyer or other individuals concerning a proposed professional sports contract, provided that the advisor does not represent you directly in negotiations for the contract. In this regard, it is permissible for an advisor to discuss with you the merits of a proposed contract give you suggestions about the type of offer you should consider. In order to maintain your eligibility at an NCAA school, however, you may not use this advisor as a link between you and the professional sports team. Rather, you must view the advisor as an extension of your own interests and not as a source to contact a professional team. If you use the advisor as a direct contact with a professional team, the advisor shall be considered an agent, and you will have jeopardized your eligibility at an NCAA school. For example, an advisor may not be present during discussions of a contract offer with a professional team or have direct contact (i.e., in person, by telephone, email or mail) with the professional sports team on your behalf. Finally, it is important to note that in order to maintain your eligibility at the NCAA school, if you receive assistance from an advisor, you will be required to pay that advisor at his or her normal rate for such services. I know this is probably abused, but IIRC the White Sox were one team that actually blew the whistle on a player using an "advisor" incorrectly.

There was a full page ad in an LA newspaper on Sunday thanking Sterling for his $3 million donation for kidney research to UCLA and stated a research center was going to be named in his honor. UCLA has returned the approximately $500k already given to them by Sterling. They also said at no time was a building going to be named in his honor, and finally said they had nothing to do with the thank you ad. Sterling actually paid for the ad to thank himself.