StrangeSox

Hooooooooooooly s*** this answer to allegations against him is...not good. Especially the "never even met them" when he's definitely without question met at least one of them who was doing a story on Trump.

Just want to say again that Chris Wallace is doing a really solid job here so far.

...we need to s*** all over our allies otherwise they won't pay up?

I'm pretty sure we have more than enough nuclear weapons to destroy the entire world 100x over. Who is that "RUSSIA BUILDS NUKES!" position supposed to appeal to?

Donald droppin' the unstoppable "no u!" bomb

QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Oct 19, 2016 -> 08:09 PM) "SECOND AMENDMENT. PRO-LIFE" - Trump on Supreme Court "Mr. Trump, does Secretary Clinton convince you of her position?" Wow fantastic question there, Chris! "Secretary Clinton, were you extremely upset?" Fantastic moderation. Aside from those two silly questions, it does seem like a legitimate debate so far, so actually good job Chris Wallace.

I don't think he's bad, he could just use a little more emotion at times. You can be impartial but still excited for big moments.

QUOTE (bigruss22 @ Oct 19, 2016 -> 01:44 PM) A big piece of that is because of how hated Trump is. Like Tony just asked, if this was Rubio running vs Hillary it wouldn't be nearly as lopsided with msm bias. I bet Clinton would probably have more media on her side but Trump literally changed the game (and not in a good way for republicans). He also intentionally and unintentionally sucks all of the air out of the room. There'd be more room for coverage of other issues if he wasn't doing something ridiculous on a nearly daily basis. He's been doing it since the primaries, and back then it was a major factor in him keeping anyone else from really gaining any traction.

QUOTE (raBBit @ Oct 19, 2016 -> 02:25 PM) Every time a woman who no one has ever heard of says Trump looked at her funny we have round the clock news coverage calling him a sexist rapist fascist. good lord

Rabbit if you don't know anyone attached to the Trump campaign, what was the point of this response to NSS? Why would it be worth noting that someone who doesn't know anyone in the Trump campaign at all doesn't know any disgraced official from his campaign? QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Oct 19, 2016 -> 08:00 AM) Anyone who thought scumbags only existed in Trump's campaign were kidding themselves. QUOTE (raBBit @ Oct 19, 2016 -> 11:05 AM) I can't even name one disagraced official in Trump's Campaign.

QUOTE (raBBit @ Oct 19, 2016 -> 02:14 PM) The video was released Monday morning. The mainstream media was quiet on it the entire day. Foval got fired and finally Hannity reported it on Monday night. So Hannity really broke down the MSM black out. Then when Creamer had to resign yesterday a lot of people on the right freaking out at all the MSM outlets and their anchors. Finally Jake Tapper covered yesterday afternoon and Cooper, who hasn't been afraid to call HRC on her bs in the past, did cover it too. If the Clinton Campaign didn't do away with Foval and Creamer for damage control I am not sure the MSM would have ever covered the story. For the tenth time, they didn't work for the Clinton campaign.

Speaking of disgraced Trump campaign people, Trump and Ailes are no long speaking.

QUOTE (Buehrle>Wood @ Oct 19, 2016 -> 01:37 PM) "And the white sox have won the world series" Buck is awful His announcing enthusiasm reminds me of this guy from Futurama

He works for an independent PAC that, legally, the official Clinton campaign cannot coordinate with or direct. I'm not sure if the official parties can communicate with the PACs, but they are not part of the same apparatus and any one of us could start up a PAC tomorrow in some candidate's name and the campaign and official parties can't really do anything to stop it other than to disavow and say they aren't involved and don't support the views/actions etc. There is a lot of wink-wink, nudge-nudge coordination between campaigns and PACs, but directly commenting on personnel would be an obvious step over the line.

Reminds me of this

I'm really confused as to why Trump is bringing Obama's half-brother to the debate tonight.

QUOTE (CrimsonWeltall @ Oct 19, 2016 -> 10:14 AM) Lewandowski? Manafort? Ailes? Guiliani, Christie...

The people who resigned worked for independent PACs, not the Clinton campaign itself.

Watching it in an LA-area bar with one sad table of Cubs fans was pretty fun. Good payback for making me hear their awful, awful theme song that always manages to lodge itself in my brain.

QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Oct 19, 2016 -> 09:30 AM) Yea, im sure every time a trade is made, teams make sure every player traded away wont be good Secrets to being a successful GM: sign, trade for good players; don't sign, trade away bad players! Secrets to winning baseball: you have a very good chance of winning if you score more runs than the other team

Dave Weigel with a pretty good summary of the latest O'Keefe videos

FWIW, Mark Burnett (former Apprentice producer) has denied the claims that he's a Trump supporter.

The white flight of Derek Black The former heir to a white nationalist movement reconsiders the ideology he once worked to promote http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/am...y-a7364966.html

QUOTE (iamshack @ Oct 18, 2016 -> 10:31 PM) I just don't think it's worth getting cute over. They bring some other guy in, he happens to not be sharp, they get something cooking, and then all of the sudden you are using 3-4 more guys to get out of the inning and win. I think the odds are they could have pulled him without something like that happening, but it just isn't worth taking the chance IMO. Yep, it's the nlcs, play to win today, not tomorrow or the next day.

Hell of a snag right there