StrangeSox

Corroboration for at least one of trump's accusers https://twitter.com/paulmcl/status/786707782191939584

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix...x-talk-scandal/

Imagine if Romney, McCain, or Obama had had a scandal like this. Just this one single scandal about lying about their donations to a 9/11 charity. They'd have been buried. With Trump, this will barely be a blip on the radar. And he's still going to get 35%+ of the vote.

QUOTE (bmags @ Oct 13, 2016 -> 08:35 PM) Glad Acorn continues as a cutting edge Zombie Bogeyman The ACORN line, the giant header, the fact that it's in Word and not excel, the section that's just labeled VOTER SUPPRESSION. It couldn't be any more obviously intentionally fake.

QUOTE (CrimsonWeltall @ Oct 13, 2016 -> 08:43 PM) I don't think he's a pedophile, but it's another disturbing piece of evidence that he views females primarily as sexual objects, either currently or with future potential. He sexualized his then-1 year old daughter Tiffany, commenting on her "great legs" but how he wasn't sure if she'd grow up to get her mom's big breasts. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-35...rview-1994.html

lmao so many people/idiots are falling for this https://twitter.com/mongo_ebooks/status/786624339911204864

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Oct 13, 2016 -> 07:35 PM) I don't like Trump, and don't doubt for a second he has stepped way over the line on several occasions, but this one is a reach IMO. It's all part of the same pattern of forcing himself on women who don't want or are actively rejecting his sexual advances though. QUOTE (iamshack @ Oct 13, 2016 -> 07:58 PM) I agree Dick, and was going to post the same, but then I figured, hmmm...this will just come back to bite me in the ass when something comes out showing he actually did something with an underage woman. Yeah, I really hope not, but...

Trump in 2010 on Fox boasted that the best way to win over a woman is to “move forward, even if you get smacked."

The Washington Post asked Clinton, Trump for their education vision. Here’s what they said. Spoiler alert: Clinton's campaign answered each of the 22 questions at length, totaling about 4000 words in response. This was the entirety of Trump's response:

So how quickly did Trump's foundation start using the funds as his own personal slush fund? Almost immediately. Three months after it started, he was using the funds to buy himself a membership to the Met.

QUOTE (CrimsonWeltall @ Oct 13, 2016 -> 02:01 PM) Trump says he obviously didn't sexually assault Natasha Stroynoff because "look at her". Molest a woman who isn't hot? Gross! Reminds me of the people who think the worst part of the Biblical story where Sodomites try to engage in gay rape of angels is the gay part, and not the rape part.

QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Oct 13, 2016 -> 03:23 PM) Thou shalt not post Marvel GIFs. How 'bout DC mashups of Bane and Trump's speech from today? https://twitter.com/BEHdc/status/7866397386...src=twsrc%5Etfw

WaPo's "The Closing Argument Against Donald Trump" is a solid point-by-point demolition of Trump.

Here's the full context of Trump's (((international banks))) comments "thinly veiled" is being too kind.

QUOTE (CrimsonWeltall @ Oct 13, 2016 -> 01:31 PM) Trump to NYT: You're trying to ruin my reputation. I'm gonna sue you. NYT to Trump: You already ruined your reputation. Bring it, b****. http://www.nytco.com/the-new-york-timess-r...raction-letter/

QUOTE (Tony @ Oct 13, 2016 -> 02:25 PM) Cuban has said, and he's probably right, the Trump brand is over. His restaurants, golf courses, hotels all cater to the high class and "elite". I would wager 98% of the people attending his rallies could never afford to stay at one of his places. So either he re-brands to cater to a different, lower class audience (I don't see that happening..) or...he's done. The DC post office hotel he keeps bragging about is already struggling. In an area where luxury hotels are typically 400 a night, he needs 750 to break even. I guess other project bidders filed objections way back when the project was being awarded claiming that Trump's projected room rates and occupancy rates were obviously BS, and this was before he nuked his own brand.

(from Full Frontal w/ Sam Be)

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Oct 13, 2016 -> 12:27 PM) It will be interesting to see what this does to Trump after the election. His base isn't exactly the target of his brand. I think if the Apprentice tape comes out and he actually said what that woman is claiming, he may be totally ruined and Eric Trump may have to get a real job. Trump TV or some other sort of media empire in coordination with Breitbart is my guess.

In some ways I'm worried about his cult-like base turning violent, but then I remember how they all (including Trump) pissed their pants and fled from Chicago over some protests that were more tame than what I've seen in the upper deck at a Cubs-Sox game.

QUOTE (Ezio Auditore @ Oct 13, 2016 -> 12:54 PM) His supporters online aren't as subtle, they just say "Jews" Oh no! They have these very clever code words! http://www.dailydot.com/layer8/racist-code...gle-censorship/ (they are not clever)

Right, "implied" may have been a better word to use there. Mentioned it last night, but hey everyone go and donate to RAINN if you want to help rape and abuse victims.

Trump's in full-blown conspiracy paranoia land right now. (((Globalists))), (((banks))), and the media are all conspiring to stop him from making America great again. If this is true, thank you Illuminati for ensuring that the fascist orange baby man does not become President. He's also smearing his accusers in a way that can be perceived as a threat against anyone else coming forward.

Lou Dobbs tweeted out the personal contact information of one of Trump's accusers. https://twitter.com/polly/status/7865998201...src=twsrc%5Etfw Gee, it sure is a mystery why women are hesitant to come forward.

A judge issued a probable cause criminal summons to Chris Christie over the Bridgegate scandal. Multiple former advisers/staff have testified that he was aware of what was going on before and during the closures. https://twitter.com/brian4NY/status/7865674...src=twsrc%5Etfw Can one of you fancy lawyer types explain the implications of "probable cause criminal summons"?