StrangeSox

kill all white people

QUOTE (MexSoxFan#1 @ Sep 21, 2012 -> 12:36 PM) I've had some arguments with white working class dudes (I worked in a machine shop when I was younger) who complain about blacks and welfare, they always argued that the only people on welfare were blacks and other minorities... from here

I didn't have to take a test when I renewed at 26 and don't recall hearing of anyone who did.

QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Sep 21, 2012 -> 11:41 AM) I never understood why liberals think that when conservatives b**** about this it's only black people we're considered about. Here is your answer: QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Sep 21, 2012 -> 12:20 PM) That's not necessarily inconsistent if those white people are simply saying long-term recipients are a problem, even if they personally received some short term welfare. What does the data show re: blacks versus whites there? Do blacks accept more welfare for longer periods of time? Or is it pretty equal? In Chicago I'm guessing it's blacks more (with my knowledge of the CHA and the hospitals in the area), but maybe in towns like Boston with poor Irish it's more equal. Assumptions on who receives what sort of aid, how much aid and for how long can be used to rationalize white people's aid while criticizing black people's aid. You, being a well-educated professional who experiences this issue at least tangentially and argues on the internet about politics ad nauseum, are not aware of the data. What is the likelihood of the average working-class white poll respondent being aware of that data? edit: I'm pretty sure that, if anything, this would be even more pronounced in Boston. It's not exactly known as a diverse, well-integrated city.

Also this recent study on white working-class Americans: (from) Research like this would seem to support the liberal/progressive contention that much of the discussion of the social safety net is tinged with racial bias. Working-class whites receive many government benefits themselves, but those benefits are not seen in the same light as the "hand outs" that other people get. eg from the report:

On the other hand, Ta-Nehisi Coates has an interesting piece on the increasingly abstract nature of racialist politics and dog-whistles.

Probably because of the history of things like the "welfare queen" mythos and most white working-class people failing to identify themselves in the 47% while vehemently decrying government handouts. Craig T. Nelson's statement really highlights it.

Chaos on Bulls*** Mountain The Daily Show with Jon Stewart Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c Chaos on Bulls**t Mountain www.thedailyshow.com Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor & Satire Blog The Daily Show on Facebook http://www.eschatonblog.com/2012/09/bulls***-mountain.html

I'm gonna guess that the administrators' actions might actually be driven by a desire to create a safe learning environment for the student.

QUOTE (Y2HH @ Sep 21, 2012 -> 10:10 AM) They are...but if you're making an acception/accommodation for a peanut allergy, which while a more common allergy still afflicts a vast minority people, I -- as a concerned parent -- want to know why you won't make an acception for my kid who is deathly allergic to dairy? You've set precedent on banning foods being an acceptable practice for just in case reasons -- so now you've opened the door for litigation when it comes to any/other foods, too. Like I said...where do we draw the line? Accidental contact with peanut butter is fairly easy and potentially deadly.not true of dairy.

QUOTE (Iwritecode @ Sep 21, 2012 -> 10:00 AM) I've seen a story on a kid that was allergic to sunlight. I'm pretty sure his parents had to find a way to change their lives to deal with it. They couldn't just send him out and hope that he would be ok. Right, they couldn't have the school make minor accommodations for him. You can for peanut allergies.

QUOTE (Y2HH @ Sep 21, 2012 -> 09:47 AM) Again...where does it end? These same reaction occur from other things aside from peanut butter, but anything with 'tree nuts' involved...honey, etc... In 30 years we'll have banned so many things that all we can eat is a protein tablet with some water. No thank you. It ends somewhere around, "hey, can you abide this minor dietary change for your lunches? Thanks!"

QUOTE (Y2HH @ Sep 21, 2012 -> 09:47 AM) Again...where does it end? These same reaction occur from other things aside from peanut butter, but anything with 'tree nuts' involved...honey, etc... In 30 years we'll have banned so many things that all we can eat is a protein tablet with some water. No thank you. It ends somewhere around, "hey, can you abide this minor dietary change for your lunches? Thanks!"

New York State Senate race now featuring anti-gay attack ads! May be NSFW.

QUOTE (Iwritecode @ Sep 21, 2012 -> 09:39 AM) This. Especially the home-schooling part. If a kid is that severely allergic to something, why take the risk at all? Usually if they are that sensitive to it, it's not just peanut butter. It's anything that has peanuts in it. Granola bars, trail mix, snickers bars, cereal... Should they ban all that stuff from lunches too? Because it'd be better for the kid to lead a normal childhood instead of being ostracized if the only cost is not having peanut butter at school. It also teaches children a lesson about doing things to help others. I don't think those other "may contain peanuts" or "processed on equipment that also processes peanuts" products present nearly as much of a risk of contact and ingestion as straight-up peanuts and especially greasy, oily, sticky peanut butter do, but I may be wrong.

I didn't see this when it first came out, but apparently the Macbrook Pro's RAM is soldered in.

NO COOK COUNTY TAXES

Texas Patriot Lynches Chair!

People that get Lake Michigan tap water and still drink bottled water should be drowned.

They didn't push it to their highest levels. They matched the 93-94 Republican minority and then steadily declined.

QUOTE (Y2HH @ Sep 21, 2012 -> 08:52 AM) Most bottled water is local, unless you prefer the 50$ Fiji bottle...because it's square packaging. For Illinois, that might hold true thanks to that giant lake we border, but that's part of the problem. Great Lakes water is being bottled and shipped across the country, out of its natural watershed.

Ezra Klein has an article about the use of cloture votes back in May: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-k...Hf0RU_blog.html

QUOTE (Y2HH @ Sep 21, 2012 -> 08:45 AM) In that frame, of course its not "both sides", since you've limited the "historical data" to one iteration of congress. Well that's what we're talking about, unprecedented use to obstruct anything and everything to achieve their stated #1 goal: make Obama a 1-term President. Yes, Democrats and Republicans have both used the filibuster in the past. The "not to this insane extent" is exactly the point, though, and what sinks the "both sides!" argument. Because "both sides!" haven't done it to this insane extent.

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Sep 21, 2012 -> 08:49 AM) (Bottled water isn't good for you. At least not when you consider the existence of "The bottle"). (and the draining of local water tables and lakes/rivers/ponds etc. when that water is bottled shipped hundreds/thousands of miles away)