Texsox

QUOTE (Alpha Dog @ May 22, 2008 -> 10:06 AM) No, I am saying it is wrong that people can get a job in this country and not speak any english. I guess if you want the Federal Government to help you make hiring decisions, go for it. I just think private companies should be allowed to run their business the way they feel is best. The fewer government interventions the better.

The state sends out for bids for firefighting services. They want the best price possible for these services. They discover a problem when the crew chiefs do not speak the same language as the workers. Does the state accept higher prices, and pass it on to the taxpayers and demand English only Crews, or allow the companies to hire anyone they want as long as safety is maintained? The state is not discriminating at all. They are saying hire anyone you like, but if you hire people who only speak one language, you will incur this extra burden of also hiring chiefs who speak their language. Seems like this policy would encourage companies to hire English speakers.

The state mandated in their bids that all supervisers need to speak the language of every crew member. Are you saying that is wrong? There were enough bilingual people around me that not speaking Spanish was a bother, but not critical. And yes, I was on an American payroll and crossed the bridge every day.

QUOTE (kapkomet @ May 21, 2008 -> 10:33 PM) Who can walk right into a hospital and still get seen for free anyway (as a government entity = public hospital)? For emergencies. Which is a problem. It over taxes our emergency rooms with minor stuff. They ain't getting radiation treatments.

Probably the same way I got a job in Mexico without speaking Spanish. I filled a need and had the necessary jobs skills to get the job done.

QUOTE (Alpha Dog @ May 21, 2008 -> 10:29 PM) Who will NOT be refused health care. Surgery and related treatment for a brain tumor?

QUOTE (YASNY @ May 21, 2008 -> 10:00 PM) Fixed wrong board

Just like to mention I am 7-0 when starting positive game threads. I'm like a PED

where are we at? I was a little busy. Score/Inning?

QUOTE (Alpha Dog @ May 21, 2008 -> 07:49 PM) In state-sponsored health care, an average person in teddy's position would take 6 months to even get to see a doctor for treatment, and by then he would be already dead. Or if he did get to see someone before he died, they sure wouldn't want to 'waste' their resources on a 70+ year old man who is of dubious health at best. Contrast that to one of millions of working Americans without insurance?

I would not jump to the conslusion they were drafting garbage. The homerun, to use that metaphore, would be a blue chip willing to play the kickback game.

QUOTE (knightni @ May 21, 2008 -> 01:37 PM) Ah dammit. LINE?

QUOTE (mr_genius @ May 21, 2008 -> 05:45 PM) Actually, a trip to Cuba is a drastic drop in health care quality for the average worker. DRASTIC drop. Depemds if they have health insurance or not. Depends on what treatment their HMO will authorize. Bottom line, they are probably financially crippled at the end.

QUOTE (juddling @ May 21, 2008 -> 03:38 PM) so nice....you had to say it twice.......LOL It's the only way I can stay on pace for 50,000 lifetime posts.

QUOTE (DrunkBomber @ May 21, 2008 -> 03:34 PM) The date on the video says May 8, 08 That's what I was trying to figure out. At first I just thought it was one of those internet things that circulates forever. (Did they ever pass that tax on emails?)

QUOTE (juddling @ May 21, 2008 -> 02:22 PM) maybe Ted can hop on down to Cuba with Mikey Moore and get some of that great Cuban healthcare I've been hearing so much about...... Actually this highlights that even with the best health care money and power and gain, some stuff just sneaks up and kicks you in the balls. But clearly he is better off than the average worker in American, and for them, a trip to Cuba would be an improvement.

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ May 21, 2008 -> 01:41 PM) I find it quite interesting that your instinct was to care more about the race and age of an Obama VP choice than to care about the policies they advocate or their leadership skills or anything else. I believe with McCain and Obama, the major issues will be pretty well defined. It's going to be intangibles. If a Dem wins, I will be very wrong on a statement I've made for two decades. I always felt the first minority or woman President would be from the GOP.

QUOTE (Controlled Chaos @ May 21, 2008 -> 01:57 PM) She helped get me through puberty. Along with And

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ May 21, 2008 -> 02:31 PM) Scrubs I should have offered that option, but I felt her role was too small and not frequent enough.

I think the GOP and DEM only threads have gone about the way I envisioned they would. A nice place to commiserate with like minded posters. Mild disagreements are fine, but a Dem in the GOP thread is about the same as a Cub fan in Pale Hose. They may be welcome, but act nice. Like SS said, it's nice to not get stalked. For the upcoming general, candidate specific is necessary, and we should try and keep the trolling down. I'd rather see smaller issue dominated threads, then a massive everything thread. I'd also like to have a non partisan discussion on the overall campaign.

So basically Oregon is requiring private crews have an English speaking chief, plus Spanish speaking, if that private company employs any Spanish speaking employees. Seems like a fair provision to write into the contract. Far different than if they were state employees.

QUOTE (BigSqwert @ May 21, 2008 -> 12:39 PM) Most overrated hottie of my life time. 2 out of 3 celebs disagree