kitekrazy

QUOTE (LDF @ May 28, 2015 -> 02:01 PM) why not, they are paying a crap load of money to do nothing. all that crap that he was involve in must have died away by now. Oh the media would revive that mess. Supposedly it would offend people who live here and are waiting for things to improve back home. I bet Ozzie would turn them down anyway, BTW that situation with managers seems so "White Sox" except firing during the season. Trying to get a former experienced manager still drawing a salary is probably hard to do.

QUOTE (LDF @ May 29, 2015 -> 04:11 PM) why, he learned it all from $$ Bill of the BlackHawks. i am being honest here. And how did that change? Bill died. Son decides to line the organization with people from consistent winning organizations and not littering it with former players.

QUOTE (Jerksticks @ May 29, 2015 -> 04:23 PM) Kite how is reinsdorf a problem. He consistently puts out a top payroll considering the lack of attendance. Do you think we should consistently spend more? Loyalty over accountability.

I'd rather have change in upper management. http://chicago.suntimes.com/baseball/7/71/...ng-expectations This bigger problem is Reinsdorf.

It might be the communication between pitcher and catcher. This is not good. Usually hitters have a better chance seeing the pitcher the 3rd time around. Fire Don Cooper.

2 in a row. Season best is 6.

QUOTE (PorkChopExpress @ May 27, 2015 -> 09:03 AM) I have had this feeling for a while, too. It seems hard to believe that there is some team philosophy that exists that is responsible for the trend (if there really is one). Maybe it's just a bigger spotlight than the players were used to on other teams. I was really hoping they signed Victor Martinez in the offseason, because even at his age, I thought he would make a good litmus test. The guy has only hit less than .300 5 out 14 years (prior to 2015), and still managed .278 as the lowest of those 5 years, and each of those 5 years was less than a full season for one reason or another. He's not doing so hot to start this year, so maybe it wouldn't have been such a great test, but I guess we'll never know. I would just love to see what happens if the Sox get a guy like Trout or Miggy, arguably both still in their prime (Miggy is a bit older, but simply does not stop hitting). I know it's never going to happen, but I often wonder if they came here, would they decline as well. As for Miggy hitting in the Cell for 81 games, probably not much decline.

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ May 27, 2015 -> 03:11 PM) Thankfully they scored in the 10th. Dragging this game out a few more innings could have been bad in more ways than one. At least it wasn't a West Coast night game.

I'm a fan of Robin's decision to let Roberston back in there.

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ May 27, 2015 -> 02:26 PM) I'm expecting Thome. The new rinse and repeat, popular player, ability to manage not required. Maybe Ron Kittle well get a shot some day.

QUOTE (BigHurt3515 @ May 27, 2015 -> 02:55 PM) There ya go Beckham It's odd that I find him to be one of the more clutch players on this team.

QUOTE (Soxfest @ May 27, 2015 -> 02:41 PM) Guys I am beyond words with this team anymore.................Sox have pissed off the baseball Gods Stink always spreads on this team. It finally got to Robertson.

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ May 27, 2015 -> 02:38 PM) 3 years, $42 million. Good one!

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ May 27, 2015 -> 02:31 PM) Well that PA was ineffective. Welcome to White Six baseball.

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ May 27, 2015 -> 11:28 AM) So what is your solution? You've said before that the White Sox can't rebuild because the fanbase won't survive multiple losing seasons. You've spent the entire thread saying that this bandwagon fan base can't be counted upon to support the team unless they're winning world series - even the division isn't enough. You get angry when someone points out that the logic you present leads to "this team therefore cannot survive in this city". What other options are there? They don't have good people running the minors either. Rumor has it the word "sell" is coming up in the organization. Even with that the same inept people will probably remain for a while. All the people in the minors need to go.

Unfortunately firing Ventura probably comes a replacement inside the organization. It will be rinse and repeat.

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ May 27, 2015 -> 02:03 PM) I very strongly disagree with the concept that you should not judge the GM based on the results of their decision rather than how the decision looked at the time. It's an excuse that leaves us with a losing franchise. If a person makes decisions that constantly look correct at the time and blow up in their face every single time...then it is absolutely time to reevaluate that decision making process and that's where we are right now. The assumptions behind those moves are simply incorrect. We're ignoring defense. We're ignoring fundamentals. We're continuing to push people too aggressively. We thought we had a team (both this year and in 2013) that was ready to compete and we spent a whole lot of money based on that assumption. We are totally failing to understand this roster, this team, or how to build a competitive team. If every decision looks fine and they completely implode, then we need to reevaluate how we're judging these decisions. Either that, or every decision we made did work out, and the coaching staff completely failed in their job of getting those players ready to go. Take your pick. I'm going with "both". neither is not an option unless you're ok with winning 45% of your games. Rumor has it he doesn't have the control like most GMs. These things you mention are similar to KW running the show.

QUOTE (Buehrle>Wood @ May 27, 2015 -> 08:37 AM) My pick would be Don Cooper. I don't think he'll be part of the next managing regime, unless he is the manager himself, so might as well give him that chance now. He deserves it after all these years in the organization There's a good chance he's a disaster, which is fine by me. No different then what is going now. At best, his fiery personality could light a fire under this team. His personality will be good to grab some much needed headlines even when we stink. Keep us somewhat relevent. Similar to Ozzie in that regard. Maybe he should be fired as pitching coach. I'll take Ventura over Cooper. In some professional sports when you criticize the fan base like Cooper does, you are shown the door.

QUOTE (chitownsportsfan @ May 27, 2015 -> 02:02 PM) Ramirez needs to sit for a couple days. He's on pace for -1.2 fWAR and his defensive metrics are the worst they've been since his rookie year. Sit his ass down and tell him that nobody on the team is guaranteed a spot every day no matter how long they've been here. Isn't he due for a new contract? Odd that many players "peak" instead of regressing like this.

QUOTE (greg775 @ May 26, 2015 -> 10:28 PM) I've become jaded. Because whenever a new guy arrives, he seems to always start slowly, at least the hitters (Robertson, Duke were on fire and quite effective out of the gates). But if we bring up a hitter or acquire a hitter, it seems to me he always starts horrifically. I'm not talking about a home run on opening day for LaRoche; I'm talking the first 25 at bats. Some of the well known names usually come from the NL and they can't adjust to the AL. I think it would be different if they were younger players.

Mike Schmidt: Today's hitters don't want much help http://sports.yahoo.com/news/mike-schmidt-...54128--mlb.html This is a great read.

QUOTE (fathom @ May 26, 2015 -> 04:11 PM) Defense has been killing the ERA of the pitchers, as there have been just an insane amount of plays that haven't gone as errors that have resulted in big innings for the opposition. Last night's first inning might be the best example of this that you'll ever see. Defense has never been a priority under Kenny Williams and we still see it. The difference in this Sox teams this century was the defenses were better under Ozzie.

QUOTE (Thad Bosley @ May 26, 2015 -> 03:30 PM) My word! Would you look at those Kansas City Royals! Averaging nearly 32K this year after that splendid run they had through the postseason last year. Their average attendance last year was only 24K, reflective, of course, of the years and years of losing prior to last season. But lo and behold, it turns out that their fan base enjoyed all of the excitement that a solid postseason brings, and have signed up this season in hopes for more. Sounds like another fan base we know from 2006, doesn't it? And to add to the good news for fans of the Royals, their team seems well poised to do the unthinkable - make it to the playoffs in consecutive seasons! Now how about that! And if they do so, and give their fans another thrill, they will continue to build upon and expand their fan base. Yep, yep, yep - that's how it works. That's what a little winning will do for you! As for the Sox they won a World Series and it raises the bar for expectations.

QUOTE (Andy the Clown @ May 25, 2015 -> 06:26 PM) If the attendance data you are referencing support your statement, then the Sox should move. Perhaps Chicago simply cannot support two teams? I tend to believe this. It's not the Cubs so much as having to compete with Wrigley Field and the surrounding atmosphere.

QUOTE (Andy the Clown @ May 25, 2015 -> 05:34 PM) Your posts in this thread have been wonderfully insightful, and have helped me to crystallize my own thoughts on this topic. I'd just like to add another item about the Reinsdorf-owned Sox: Not only has the franchise not won enough, it doesn't believe in the value of building a minor league system. That is an organizational philosophy straight from the top; JR doesn't believe in making premium investments in prospects who haven't "proven" anything yet. So, we take the cheapest route possible in building our system. It isn't a coincidence that the only sustained period of success during the Reinsdorf era came from the efforts of the Himes regime. Instead, we rely on dumpster diving -- looking for bargain free agents and hoping they pan out. Usually, they don't; with 2005 being the glaring exception. Part of the way fans develop a passion for their teams is by following their minor league prospects as they develop. It gives the fans a greater sense of identification with the players as they roll through the system, and the bond with them is strong once they reach the majors. Of course, we have had relatively few prospects worth following the past decade. Many of those who have developed have been traded away. In sum, we don't believe in building from within, and we won't pay top prices for premier free agents. What is left is the steaming pile of mediocrity that is the JR Sox. Like I said in an earlier post, I can no longer support this franchise with this owner. It's difficult to say this, as I've loved the Sox with all my heart since 76. But the bottom line is that this is entertainment. This is not life and death; it's baseball. And if following this team makes me miserable because I fundamentally disagree with several key principles upon which it is run, the onus is on me to change my behavior. I certainly do not expect JR to change. I live in Dallas, and my son loves the Rangers. For years I've tried to steer him towards the Sox, but he finds their games "horrifyingly boring". He always has. Even though the Rangers suck, he'd rather watch them lose 10-7 than watch the Sox win. I'm learning to embrace his thought process, and enjoy the game of baseball with his team rather than worry about the perpetual incompetence of my own. This is a great post as well.