thxfrthmmrs

Buddy Bell is smarter than we are after all

QUOTE (raBBit @ Aug 26, 2014 -> 03:04 PM) You're right, and I would probably put the number at 40-50 but closer to 40. As far as Hansen, he's never been able to keep his velocity in the mid-90's and that probably led to the Sox moving him into the pen. I hope I'm wrong but it's a lot harder for guys who are 6'8" to repeat their mechanics and Hansen hasn't been able to do that. I would like to see more reports on his velocity though but everything I've found would be considered a detriment to his future. I read that his FB is around low to mid 90's when coming out of pen, and slider has flashed plus. I don't think it's too much of a stretch to see him getting a shot in the big league bullpen in the next year or two.

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Aug 26, 2014 -> 02:14 PM) I'm ok with that, but now you've made this a hypothetical player which could be anyone. Attach a name and I'll be more willing to reply. James Shields was the name I noted who has come up several times. Next year he's not a strong upgrade over Noesi and he turns 33 this December. He's the definition of a "win now" player and it's just crazy to sign him if you aren't sure you have a fully stocked roster that season. Are you willing to say that James Shields at age 34 is going to be the last piece? I'll give a counterexample myself. If the White Sox decided that they wanted an almost full time LH hitting DH, Pablo Sandoval hits free agency this year and he just turned 28. If you locked him up for 5 years, then even if the team wasn't competitive this year, you'd still have his rights the next few years and there's no reason to predict him falling apart at age 29. But, that throws out all the other issues. Do we know for sure we'll need a DH? Do we want to commit money to that position and risk having a bigger need crop up in the next season? Are there other options available the next offseason we could target if we saved that money instead? And so on. I think we would be comparing Shields vs. Carroll here, not Noesi. Preferably, we like to target a pitcher we can lock up long term and would perform at or above expectation for the duration of the contract. But the Sox also have 4 top pitching prospects who are a couple years away from making the big leagues (granted, not all of them will work out), so settling for a stop gap solution like Shields isn't the worst idea. I think their main focus should be fielding a competitive team next year (can't afford 3 losing years in a row and another terrible year in attendance), and from what we are seeing from the Royals and Indians, you don't need a star studded team to compete in this division. Given that, I do not think we need to make huge changes to become a better, and more competitive team next year. A full year of Eaton, Garcia, Sanchez and Semien would be huge upgrades alone over Beckham, ADA and Viciedo. Add a #2 starter and 2 good bullpen arms, this team could easily be above .500

QUOTE (raBBit @ Aug 26, 2014 -> 01:04 PM) Why wouldn't they just move Semien to LF and keep Gillaspie at 3B? Regardless, all of these positions are not going to be filled internally. They are going to bring in some combination of power and LH hitter(s). If we don't land a guy like Melky Cabrera or Rasmus, I actually hope Semien would be our starting LF next season.

QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Aug 26, 2014 -> 01:35 PM) OK, if Anderson doesn't qualify... and we know Montas is going because Bell said he is, I believe... I'd go with: Montas Anderson Bassitt Snodgress Ravelo Coats Also very possible: Kyle Hansen, if he's healthy by then. If Snodgress goes to Chicago, that makes Hansen a strong candidate. I don't think they send any SP's that pitched the full year. If they do, Recchia is a possibility, so is Bucciferro. You have to pick one of Anderson, Montas and Coats, since all were below AA as of 8/1 I'd would go with: Bassitt Snodgress Hansen/Olacio (interesting both were moved up to AA just before 8/1, meaning they might have had AFL in plans for them) Anderson Trayce Thompson Nieto

There are 6 players who are having good years at Triple A and deserves to the September call ups: Rodon, Mitchell, Semien, Wilkins, Taylor and Phegley. Of the 6, Rodon, Wilkins and Taylor are not on the 40 man roster. I'd think Davidson gets the call as well given our investment in him. It'd be interesting to see who actually gets called up in a week. P.S. I would like to give credit to the FO for sticking with Mitchell and not letting him go when all hope was lost. It seems like he's at least capable of having a role on a big league team.

Semien looks like he's upset he was passed for the promotion. Unfortunately for Alvarez he will be 25 next year and will be starting the year at Kanny. I don't see him passing Peter and DiMichele on the 2B org chart yet.

When in doubt, go with the one with the best pitch. And Bassitt has always had the stats to back it up. I can understand some people were low on him because he missed most of the year and he's already 25. But now it's time take him seriously.

QUOTE (Timmy U @ Aug 22, 2014 -> 01:11 PM) I think this is 100% about making Anderson eligible for the Fall League. Not really, in order for a player to be assigned to AFL without losing the one slot for below AA player each team is entitled to, the player has be playing for AA or above as of Aug 1st. Though I think this move is a no brainier as a domino effect of Micah shut down and Sanchez promoted.

QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Aug 22, 2014 -> 09:33 AM) I have an obvious bias, but I think Semien deserves more playing time than that. If Sanchez plays well in the next month, he gets the starting 2B job, if not then the job is up for grabs between him and Semien, and even Micah heading into next year. And if Sanchez hits a bump next year or Gillaspie comes back down to earth, I think Semien is next in line to take over. With his position flexibility, he can easily get 300-400 PA's next year. The point is I'd prefer a platoon of Gillapsie and Semien to maximize the production out of the 3B position.

QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Aug 21, 2014 -> 03:56 PM) I think some folks are maybe overreacting to Bassitt a bit. I like him, I think I had him around 20 or 22 on my list of prospects, just as he was starting his return. He looks healthy which is great, but I can't see a legit argument having him any higher than the bottom of the teens. He's got a very good fastball, and nothing else above average, unless he's made large scale changes recently. It's definitely not any worse than people overreacting on James Dykstra's Low A stats and ranked him in the upper teens in the ranking. And I think most of the FS voters had Dykstra much higher than Bassitt, which, to me, is the bigger crime. I am probably one of Bassitt's biggest supporters, dating back to last year. It isn't just based on his recent success. Even so, I think his potential only tops out as a back of the rotation starter, with bullpen as the much more likely destination. But given that he was a 22 year old college senior drafted in the 16th round, and now he's moving closer to getting a chance to start in the majors, this has to be one of the bigger success stories for the Sox in recent years.

Really, the only crime Conor Gillaspie has committed this season is leaving Moises Sierra hanging dry, and forgetting to smile when Santa stop by to give him his Christmas present. The perfect platoon partner for Gillaspie is Semien, who has been one of the best hitters against lefties in our system throughout his career. Meanwhile, Gillaspie is hitting a cool .337 against righties. If we head into next season with Sanchez at 2B, Ramirez at SS, platoon of Gillaspie and Semien at 3B, with Semien spelling Sanchez and Ramirez, we'd be in a good shape for our infield positions.

QUOTE (maggsmaggs @ Aug 21, 2014 -> 09:55 AM) Exactly, we haven't had two legit ML-caliber shortstops in quite awhile. In the past, we had shortstops who projected as second basemen, but now we actually have two shortstops who profile as ML shortstops. Carlos Sanchez will have a better chance to stick at SS in the ML than Anderson would.

QUOTE (scs787 @ Aug 20, 2014 -> 08:48 PM) Bassit with 8Ks through 6. Dude is legit. Wish he hadn't gotten injured, he'd likely be at the very least be a September call up. I'd probably start him in AAA next year. He will have to be put on the 40 man during the off season and will be 26 come next year. He's also dominated the competition the past two years. I'd say if he performs well in ST next year, he gets a spot in the rotation.

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Aug 20, 2014 -> 12:58 PM) To make this happen we need to have an obvious guy we'd be willing to either trade, demote, or release if Rodon is tearing up the minors in May. If they're not willing to eat Danks's contract and Noesi is pitching as well as he has with the Sox, then that means they need to find an expendable arm to fill that rotation slot in April and May. I can't think of any recent years where the Sox didn't have to bring in anyone outside of their opening day rotation to start games during the season. And given the number of holes we have to fill in the lineup and bullpen, I don't think we will have a very strong back of the rotation heading into next year.

I don't want to see Rodon penciled in as a starter at the start of next year. We need to have 5 starters ready to go, and call Rodon up in event of injury or someone gets traded. Ideally, we shouldn't call him up until June. Even if we pencil him in as a starter, I am sure he will be on an inning limit, and he won't be able to help much in a playoff race if we are in one.

It's seems the 5th inning is the make or break inning for Q. His ERA for 5th inning last year was an unreal 8.51, this year 4.81. Ironically, when he first came on the scene in 2012, he would get hit hard int he first 3 innings, and settle down in the latter part of the game.

QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Aug 19, 2014 -> 02:55 PM) Forget him as a prospect, that K-rate will not work at the MLB level. I'll take that. We can run him out there to start every day, and he will take the 5th day off

QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Aug 18, 2014 -> 02:06 PM) truthfully, this is in the WWE handbook on how to bring up(what they believe to be) rising stars. Remember with Ryback, they brought him in and made him fight 2-3 wrestlers at a time for a while. Another way is to let the up and comer squash everyone until they put him in a PPV match. If Reigns falls into mid-card, it will only prove that breaking up the Shield was a panic move because Bryan went down. I really liked how they broke up, but i just think it was far too soon This is one of the few things I do not like about the company. I think some of the guys they tried to push are not ready for the job (with Reigns, it was a bit different, he was part of something special, and was awesome for like 2 months, but was quickly exposed after). And the guys who are truly over and should get the spotlight keeps getting buried by the company, i.e. Cesaro, Dolph, Bryan (for the longest time), and soon enough Bray.

QUOTE (Rowand44 @ Aug 18, 2014 -> 02:07 PM) Nope. Cena is good on the mic(when he's not making jokes) and is good in the ring too. I obviously know what you're getting at and if Reigns is pushed down our throats then yes he'll be hated as well. He will never be like Cena because Cena is charasmatic to a portion of the audience, amongst many reasons. I think he's a more explosive version of Batista.

I don't post on there much, but I'd like to say that I think Reigns will be someone the hardcore fans will hate 5 years down the road. A powerhouse with no mic skills, very limited move set, seemingly anointed as the poster boy of the company, and somehow wins all the matches with odds stacked against him, do we know someone else who fits in that profile?

Time to bring Cesaro back from the dead to fight Brock. I like him 1,000 times better than Reigns. Plus, both being "Heyman" guys, I am sure they will find some CM Punk vs Heyman and Lesner type of angle.

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Aug 17, 2014 -> 02:56 PM) The "lucky" home run thing is stupid. The only "luck" he has is being strong and skilled enough to turn deep flyballs into outs. Just like any stat in baseball, it's not perfect. It's a good indicator of the likelihood that he will continue to hit the same pitch out if other conditions of the game changes.

It's a combination of fatigue, pitchers making adjustments, and regression to the mean. He leads the league in just enough and "lucky" homeruns, only 3 of his long balls were "no doubt". He was bound to slow down at some point. While we all want him to hit 50 home runs and shatter records, it just wasn't very realistic in his first year. The encouraging sign is he's still making contact

QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Aug 16, 2014 -> 08:41 PM) Derrick Rose sucks we should cut him. You missed the point. My observation is his playing style is a bit of awkward fit for national team or all star teams.