I would go RoLo

Seems like the Lakers need to sell off their remaining salaries. I wouldnt mind getting Mo Wagner on the cheap. 

3 hours ago, bmags said:

Get it Utah.

Stephan Noh had a great piece on why the Bulls shouldn't trade up, and Cowleys article today made me believe the bulls have only mild interest. I actually wouldn't be surprised if Bulls go Reddish or Hayes tonight, or trade back.

I thought the draft was tomorrow?

Since the LA/NO trade isn't official, are they going to make the #4 pick put on a Lakers hat, etc.?

56 minutes ago, SoxAce said:

I thought the draft was tomorrow?

It is

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-top-50-nba-draft-prospects-according-to-our-carmelo-projections/

THt high again. Analytics likely giving him huge boosts for age and wingspan.

So like, the Lakers forgot to create cap space and had to call the Pelicans back to try and rework the deal...

 

 

I had a very strong opinion about what I wanted in the last draft (and it was a good opinion), but this year I don't. 

I kinda don't think they should swing for the fences, yet I would not be at all upset if they drafted Reddish.

I do not want them to trade up for Garland, but if they select him at 7 that's great. 

I wouldn't mind trading down, and would like to see players like Nickeil Alexander-Walker/Tyler Herro/Ty Jerome, PJ Washington, Clarke etc

No idea where anyone falls for real.

ESPN's mock has Culver-Garland-White going in front of the Bulls, which to me is the worst case scenario and leaves them with DeAndre Hunter at 7, which to me is the least exciting possibility but probably the right pick under those circumstances. I wouldn't trade up unless the price is trivial.

35 minutes ago, Jake said:

ESPN's mock has Culver-Garland-White going in front of the Bulls, which to me is the worst case scenario and leaves them with DeAndre Hunter at 7, which to me is the least exciting possibility but probably the right pick under those circumstances. I wouldn't trade up unless the price is trivial.

I would go Reddish or Clarke

 

If true, huge break for the Bulls.

 

4 minutes ago, SoxAce said:

 

God the Pelicans are setting themselves up nicely.

Happy bulls didn’t trade up

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2842036-bulls-rumors-bucks-malcolm-brogdon-to-get-4-year-80m-contract-offer-from-chi

Bulls going all in for Brogdon.

If that gets him hell yeah

T'Wolves traded for the 6th pick. We will get stuck with White

Everything is happening!

 

What is the guess with Minny?

4 minutes ago, BigHurt3515 said:

T'Wolves traded for the 6th pick. We will get stuck with White

That doesn’t seem bad?

16 minutes ago, bmags said:

If that gets him hell yeah

Brogdon is more of a SG though. Don't really see the fit.

6 minutes ago, bmags said:

That doesn’t seem bad?

I'd be happy!

2 minutes ago, SoxAce said:

Brogdon is more of a SG though. Don't really see the fit.

He can absolutely be part of a backcourt with Lavine. Lavine was decent bringing up ball last year

13 minutes ago, bmags said:

He can absolutely be part of a backcourt with Lavine. Lavine was decent bringing up ball last year

Eh... still 0 playmakers in that backcourt. LaVine does not have the I.Q. or vision to set up his teammates in that aspect. BUT, the Bulls aren't gonna attract any superstar players anyway so...

Edited June 20, 20196 yr by SoxAce

3 minutes ago, SoxAce said:

Eh... still 0 playmakers in that backcourt. LaVine does not have the I.Q. or vision to set up his teammates at all. BUT, the Bulls aren't gonna attract any good players anyways so...

By playmakers do you mean facilitators?