New top 20 post draft:

1. Roch Cholowsky, SS

2. Caleb Bonemer, IF

3. Billy Carlson, SS

4. Cole Prosek, 2B

5. Jaden Fauske, OF

6. Landon Thome, SS

7. Hagen Smith, LHP

8. Tanner McDougal, RHP

9. David Sandlin, RHP

10. Gabe Davis, RHP

11. Christian Oppor, LHP

12. George Wolkow, OF

13. Joey Volchko, RHP

14. Alex Weingartner, OF

15. Mason Adams, RHP

16. William Bergolla, IF

17. Blake Larson, LHP

18. Ky Bush, LHP

19. Boston Smith, CA

20. Kyle Casteel, RHP

Thought Cholowsky Emerson Vaughn were going to be ranked #18-26, roughly?

Bonemer is already lower ranked (or a higher rated prospect) on some lists.

Why is there so much variance in the Fauske rankings?

Can Thome really be higher than Hagen Smith, who's still #53 on the current/just updated Pipeline list?

Why is Gabe Davis still so high?

Months ago, there was a theory Cholowsky alone would push the overall system back into the Top 10...

Is that still the case after this draft, that they have jumped all the way from low 20s back into the #8-12 area?

In your opinion, which of the numerous relievers drafted (along with Volchko) will be at High A or AA by the end of the season?

26 minutes ago, caulfield12 said:

Thought Cholowsky Emerson Vaughn were going to be ranked #18-26, roughly?

Bonemer is already lower ranked (or a higher rated prospect) on some lists.

Why is there so much variance in the Fauske rankings?

Can Thome really be higher than Hagen Smith, who's still #53 on the current/just updated Pipeline list?

Why is Gabe Davis still so high?

Months ago, there was a theory Cholowsky alone would push the overall system back into the Top 10...

Is that still the case after this draft, that they have jumped all the way from low 20s back into the #8-12 area?

In your opinion, which of the numerous relievers drafted (along with Volchko) will be at High A or AA by the end of the season?

I think Roch is a superior overall prospect to Bonemer strictly due to defensive floor even if Caleb has a higher offensive ceiling.

I’m a big Fauske fan and he’s really turned a corner over the past month or so, putting up a 127 wRC+ over his last 135 PAs with a 13.4% BB rate, 19.4% K rate, .158 ISO, & 16 SBs (vs. 1 CS). This is the growth you want to see out of a 1st year prep sent straight to full season ball.

I’m still on the Hagen Smith bandwagon, but even the biggest optimist must penalize him some for still struggling to provide innings. I’ve said elsewhere I think his floor is a high-end bullpen weapon, which is valuable but not enough to rank him over a HS kid with plus hit & power tools. If he can provide more confidence in his ability to start, he’d probably jump past Thome for me.

Gabe Davis is a big kid with big stuff who was brought on a project who has made considerable progress this year. Him stalling out some at AA is to be expected for someone in their first year making from relieving to starting and doesn’t derail my thoughts on the kid. He’s also coming two strong starts and could be turning the corner. I remain a huge fan of this kid.

Regarding the pitching we drafted, I’m not sure any of these guys will make High A by the end of the season and certainly not AA. Not sure why you think they’re going to rush them to fill major league bullpen needs that don’t really exist at the moment. And theoretically, they have LaCombe & George in AA if they really need a premium stuff guy to throw into the pen this year.

Volchko, Segura, & Scolari will all start off in the ACL. From there, it really comes down to innings limits. I could see some of them going to Low A once the ACL season ends, but these guys will likely be relieving or doing much very short starts. I expect all three of them to be developed as SPs next year in either Kannpolis’ or Winston Salem’s rotation to start the year.

1 hour ago, Chicago White Sox said:

I think Roch is a superior overall prospect to Bonemer strictly due to defensive floor even if Caleb has a higher offensive ceiling.

I’m a big Fauske fan and he’s really turned a corner over the past month or so, putting up a 127 wRC+ over his last 135 PAs with a 13.4% BB rate, 19.4% K rate, .158 ISO, & 16 SBs (vs. 1 CS). This is the growth you want to see out of a 1st year prep sent straight to full season ball.

I’m still on the Hagen Smith bandwagon, but even the biggest optimist must penalize him some for still struggling to provide innings. I’ve said elsewhere I think his floor is a high-end bullpen weapon, which is valuable but not enough to rank him over a HS kid with plus hit & power tools. If he can provide more confidence in his ability to start, he’d probably jump past Thome for me.

Gabe Davis is a big kid with big stuff who was brought on a project who has made considerable progress this year. Him stalling out some at AA is to be expected for someone in their first year making from relieving to starting and doesn’t derail my thoughts on the kid. He’s also coming two strong starts and could be turning the corner. I remain a huge fan of this kid.

Regarding the pitching we drafted, I’m not sure any of these guys will make High A by the end of the season and certainly not AA. Not sure why you think they’re going to rush them to fill major league bullpen needs that don’t really exist at the moment. And theoretically, they have LaCombe & George in AA if they really need a premium stuff guy to throw into the pen this year.

Volchko, Segura, & Scolari will all start off in the ACL. From there, it really comes down to innings limits. I could see some of them going to Low A once the ACL season ends, but these guys will likely be relieving or doing much very short starts. I expect all three of them to be developed as SPs next year in either Kannpolis’ or Winston Salem’s rotation to start the year.

70 and 57 innings the last two years for Scolari seems light but they have to start building a floor/foundation somewhere.

Thanks for the update. I like how aggressive you were ranking Prosek. I still have Bonemer over Cholowsky, mostly cuz I'm a Stan, but also guy's a year younger doing in in AA. I remain openminded. I'm also something of a Fauske Stan, so I have him slightly above Carlson, Thome, and Prosek. Upon further review, I bumped Burrowes up into the Top 20. He's been pretty good all year and is still only 21. A lot of who deserves to be where won't be clear until like next May, so it's a lot of guesswork until then.

2 hours ago, Timmy U said:

Thanks for the update. I like how aggressive you were ranking Prosek. I still have Bonemer over Cholowsky, mostly cuz I'm a Stan, but also guy's a year younger doing in in AA. I remain openminded. I'm also something of a Fauske Stan, so I have him slightly above Carlson, Thome, and Prosek. Upon further review, I bumped Burrowes up into the Top 20. He's been pretty good all year and is still only 21. A lot of who deserves to be where won't be clear until like next May, so it's a lot of guesswork until then.

For me, Carlson’s rank reflects his draft day value as we just haven’t seen enough to pivot from it IMO. I know some have been disappointed with his bat so far, but I expected a fairly steep development curve for him going straight to full season ball. Not hitting a HR in 40 games is a bit concerning, but it’s not like he lacks raw power and the swing was always going to require work. I need to see how he does in the second half before I consider dropping him.

1 hour ago, Chicago White Sox said:

For me, Carlson’s rank reflects his draft day value as we just haven’t seen enough to pivot from it IMO. I know some have been disappointed with his bat so far, but I expected a fairly steep development curve for him going straight to full season ball. Not hitting a HR in 40 games is a bit concerning, but it’s not like he lacks raw power and the swing was always going to require work. I need to see how he does in the second half before I consider dropping him.

Makes sense to me. I like Fauske a ton. Not a reflection on Carlson, who I believe will develop some pop to go along with the glove. I just like Fauske’s tools a tad better.

This is 60 speed. This is why you always draft shortstops.

https://x.com/FutureSox/status/2077130987587137995

White Sox surge to 8th

trail only Twins in the AL Central

LAD #1 Giants huge move up too

Updated MLB Farm System Rankings After 2026 MLB Draft

With the 2026 MLB draft now complete, it's time for an updated look at how all 30 MLB farm systems stack up, and how recent picks fit into their team's organizational top 10 prospect lists.

Edited yesterday at 01:16 AM1 day by caulfield12

Mogollon at #10 seems way off.

Will have lots of different takes in terms of the respective values of Hagen Fauske Prosek Thome and Carlson.

Fauske can play CF?

While Fauske has some experience behind the plate and some scouts thought he might be the best catching prospect in the 2025 Draft, he doesn't want to play there, and the White Sox plan on developing him as a full-time outfielder. They'd rather maximize his bat and athleticism, and they think he has solid speed and instincts to possibly stick in center field. They've also put him on a throwing program to help boost his average arm strength.

2025

Scouting grades: Hit: 55 | Power: 50 | Run: 55 | Arm: 50 | Field: 50 | Overall: 50

baseballsavant.com

Jaden Fauske Stats: Statcast, Visuals & Advanced Metrics

Jaden Fauske Stats: Statcast, Visuals & Advanced Metrics

Edited yesterday at 01:24 AM1 day by caulfield12

Probably not worth it's own thread, but here is where Kiley has the new top 10 at.

Chicago White Sox

1. Roch Cholowsky, SS

2. Caleb Bonemer, SS

3. Braden Montgomery, RF

4. Billy Carlson, SS

5. Hagen Smith, LHP

6. Tanner McDougal, RHP

7. Jaden Fauske, RF

8. Cole Prosek, 3B

9. William Bergolla, SS

10. Landon Thome, SS

One thing to know: Cholowsky shows up as Noah Schultz graduates and Montgomery is almost there, too. RHP Joey Volchko (2026 third round) is a sleeper who could shoot onto this list with a handful of starts that look like his outing vs. Texas in Omaha.

11 minutes ago, DirtySox said:

Probably not worth it's own thread, but here is where Kiley has the new top 10 at.

I don’t love Thome being ranked below Bergolla. Also, Jacob would be 4th on this last based on Kiley’s previous rankings.

On 7/13/2026 at 5:56 AM, Chicago White Sox said:

New top 20 post draft:

1. Roch Cholowsky, SS

2. Caleb Bonemer, IF

3. Billy Carlson, SS

4. Cole Prosek, 2B

5. Jaden Fauske, OF

6. Landon Thome, SS

7. Hagen Smith, LHP

8. Tanner McDougal, RHP

9. David Sandlin, RHP

10. Gabe Davis, RHP

11. Christian Oppor, LHP

12. George Wolkow, OF

13. Joey Volchko, RHP

14. Alex Weingartner, OF

15. Mason Adams, RHP

16. William Bergolla, IF

17. Blake Larson, LHP

18. Ky Bush, LHP

19. Boston Smith, CA

20. Kyle Casteel, RHP

Bonemer over Roch 100 out of 100 times. Defensive edge probably makes roch safer, but I'll take the guy who is younger and pulling a wRC+ of 134 in pro ball across A+ and AA over the older guy with a 146 wRC+ in college every single time.

20 minutes ago, Look at Ray Ray Run said:

Bonemer over Roch 100 out of 100 times. Defensive edge probably makes roch safer, but I'll take the guy who is younger and pulling a wRC+ of 134 in pro ball across A+ and AA over the older guy with a 146 wRC+ in college every single time.

For your sake, I’m glad we didn’t draft Lackey. Your head would explode trying to figure out who to rank higher between Bonemer and Lackey.

1 hour ago, SoxBlanco said:

For your sake, I’m glad we didn’t draft Lackey. Your head would explode trying to figure out who to rank higher between Bonemer and Lackey.

Dont even think Lackey can overtake my love of Bonemer but it would have been neck and neck!

I might like Bonemer more than I liked Ant, but that might be pushing it!

Edited 20 hours ago20 hr by Look at Ray Ray Run

7 hours ago, Look at Ray Ray Run said:

Bonemer over Roch 100 out of 100 times. Defensive edge probably makes roch safer, but I'll take the guy who is younger and pulling a wRC+ of 134 in pro ball across A+ and AA over the older guy with a 146 wRC+ in college every single time.

I'm not trying to pick a fight but for an analytics oriented guy it's sorta wild to handwave away basically a 2 WAR head start as a solid defensive SS over an average LF. Bonemer is a great prospect, but nobody is drafting him 1st overall in this draft. roch's path to 4 war is like 240/320/400 and play a solid, not elite, just solid defensive SS. Caleb's is like 240/340/530 and don't trip over your dick out there in LF.

It's easy to see in this example why positional scarcity matters. If you want to argue Bonemer will be too good to move off "the dirt" (this and "shoving" are annoying me) that's a different argument, one I don't really pretend to have an opinion on.

Might make more sense to play Bonemer at second...leave Antonacci in the outfield, as Sam profiles as just an average 2B and a notch or two below Meidroth.

Colson 3B/SS/DH

Roch SS

Bonemer 2B/3B/DH

Vargas 1B/3B/DH

Mune ???

Carlson and Meidroth ???

Edited 14 hours ago14 hr by caulfield12

1 hour ago, chitownsportsfan said:

I'm not trying to pick a fight but for an analytics oriented guy it's sorta wild to handwave away basically a 2 WAR head start as a solid defensive SS over an average LF. Bonemer is a great prospect, but nobody is drafting him 1st overall in this draft. roch's path to 4 war is like 240/320/400 and play a solid, not elite, just solid defensive SS. Caleb's is like 240/340/530 and don't trip over your dick out there in LF.

It's easy to see in this example why positional scarcity matters. If you want to argue Bonemer will be too good to move off "the dirt" (this and "shoving" are annoying me) that's a different argument, one I don't really pretend to have an opinion on.

Defensive excellence is less scarce than offensive excellence. Even with the attention and emphasis on defense and baserunning in the modern era, the fact remains that someone will always find a place for a top tier bat who can't defend while top tier defenders who can't hit have short lived careers.

I think Bonemer is a top tier bat. And he's a good athlete to boot and isn't a worthless defender. Is he as good as roch, sounds like no, but he can play the field and has ++ speed which roch doesn't have. I'd bet on caleb to be a stand out offensive player more than I'd bet on roch to be, which is why I'd take bonemer over Roch.

59 minutes ago, Look at Ray Ray Run said:

Defensive excellence is less scarce than offensive excellence. Even with the attention and emphasis on defense and baserunning in the modern era, the fact remains that someone will always find a place for a top tier bat who can't defend while top tier defenders who can't hit have short lived careers.

I think Bonemer is a top tier bat. And he's a good athlete to boot and isn't a worthless defender. Is he as good as roch, sounds like no, but he can play the field and has ++ speed which roch doesn't have. I'd bet on caleb to be a stand out offensive player more than I'd bet on roch to be, which is why I'd take bonemer over Roch.

Where are you seeing Caleb has ++ speed? From what I've seen Roch is 50/50 speed and Bonemer is 40/40.

Bonemer is going to be a freaking stud though. I'm so high on his bat. I'm assuming he can play 2B and 3B, not just LF. Never know what will happen with our roster. His bat will play at any of those positions though. Dude had 18 bombs in 61 games in A+ and he is currently holding his own in AA as a 20 year old.

We might see him up next season if he keeps doing well in AA. Start him in AAA and call him up mid season if he's raking.

7 minutes ago, ron883 said:

Where are you seeing Caleb has ++ speed? From what I've seen Roch is 50/50 speed and Bonemer is 40/40.

Bonemer is going to be a freaking stud though. I'm so high on his bat. I'm assuming he can play 2B and 3B, not just LF. Never know what will happen with our roster. His bat will play at any of those positions though. Dude had 18 bombs in 61 games in A+ and he is currently holding his own in AA as a 20 year old.

We might see him up next season if he keeps doing well in AA. Start him in AAA and call him up mid season if he's raking.

Fastest Runner: Roldy Brito, OF, Rockies

Colorado’s No. 2 prospect had the best run time, getting down the line in 4.09 seconds on a groundout to second and topping out at 30.9 ft/sec. The other two players to break 30 ft/sec were White Sox third baseman Caleb Bonemer and Rays outfielder Theo Gillen. Gillen is not surprising, as he’s a plus runner, but Bonemer showed surprising speed for his size.

5 minutes ago, DirtySox said:

16 minutes ago, DirtySox said:

Isn't 4.2 seconds from a right handed hitter a 60-65 FV grade for speed? That's wild if it turns out Bonemer has a 60 FV for speed instead of 40. That puts him in another level as a prospect, offensively and defensively. That's so exciting.

6 hours ago, ron883 said:

Where are you seeing Caleb has ++ speed? From what I've seen Roch is 50/50 speed and Bonemer is 40/40.

Bonemer is going to be a freaking stud though. I'm so high on his bat. I'm assuming he can play 2B and 3B, not just LF. Never know what will happen with our roster. His bat will play at any of those positions though. Dude had 18 bombs in 61 games in A+ and he is currently holding his own in AA as a 20 year old.

We might see him up next season if he keeps doing well in AA. Start him in AAA and call him up mid season if he's raking.

He ran a 4.2 to first in the futures game the other day. That's 60 grade speed. I think it surprised a lot of people. Baseball America had several things on it.

6 hours ago, ron883 said:

Isn't 4.2 seconds from a right handed hitter a 60-65 FV grade for speed? That's wild if it turns out Bonemer has a 60 FV for speed instead of 40. That puts him in another level as a prospect, offensively and defensively. That's so exciting.

This what I get for responding before reading. Yup, 60 grade speed.